Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

FBI: No Charges For Hillary

forkushV
forkushV
Jul 11, 2016
7:52am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
...If Hillary sends a message to Navy general, stating that the atomic bomb will be dropped on Russia tomorrow noon, that correspondence is born top secret...
No shit.

But how about a discussion about a New York Times article describing the drone program in the Middle East. Or a discussion about the Wikileaks revelations? Or an email exchange discussing the revelations made by Edward Snowden and available to anyone with an internet connection? Or how about a supposed photograph of flying saucers hovering over Germany? One of those was classified for 26 years.

See, that's why classified documents have those classified markings. According to the FBI director, even experts look for classified markings on documents to determine the status of a document. But you know more than the FBI director, don't you Boilerman?
jatki
jatki
Jul 11, 2016
9:12am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
Someone here, is misrepresenting the situation, intentionally or unintentionally. Something doesn't require classification to be top secret secret, secret, or confidential. Instead, something is considered classified when someone classifies it.

If Hillary sends a message to Navy general, stating that the atomic bomb will be dropped on Russia tomorrow noon, that correspondence is born top secret. This document only becomes classified, however, when someone with classification authorization marks it as classified.

Now we must ask ourselves, are some liberals again intentionally misrepresenting the situation?

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: lvfritz
LOL, that's what you think he said! That's remarkable spin even for you.

She lied to the whole damn country, and you still want to try to spin it?

Amazing.
Below is the applicable quote. You don't need to characterize it, nor do I. Anyone with a passing familiarity with English should be able to figure it out on their own.

MATT CARTWRIGHT: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert about what's classified and what's not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?

JAMES COMEY: That would be a reasonable inference.



Put er on double top secret parole.

billryan
billryan
Jul 11, 2016
2:26pm
Block User
The U.S. Navy doesn't have Generals.
IndyBoilerman
IndyBoilerman
Jul 11, 2016
10:56pm
Block User
Apparently Willy has nothing...... but we already knew that

IndyBoilerman
IndyBoilerman
Jul 11, 2016
10:59pm
Block User
What is the relevance of the Cartwright and Comey quotes?


q]Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
Someone here, is misrepresenting the situation, intentionally or unintentionally. Something doesn't require classification to be top secret secret, secret, or confidential. Instead, something is considered classified when someone classifies it.

If Hillary sends a message to Navy general, stating that the atomic bomb will be dropped on Russia tomorrow noon, that correspondence is born top secret. This document only becomes classified, however, when someone with classification authorization marks it as classified.

Now we must ask ourselves, are some liberals again intentionally misrepresenting the situation?

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: lvfritz
LOL, that's what you think he said! That's remarkable spin even for you.

She lied to the whole damn country, and you still want to try to spin it?

Amazing.
Below is the applicable quote. You don't need to characterize it, nor do I. Anyone with a passing familiarity with English should be able to figure it out on their own.

MATT CARTWRIGHT: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert about what's classified and what's not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?

JAMES COMEY: That would be a reasonable inference.



Put er on double top secret parole.


chefantwon
chefantwon
Jul 12, 2016
10:48am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
...If Hillary sends a message to Navy general, stating that the atomic bomb will be dropped on Russia tomorrow noon, that correspondence is born top secret...
No shit.

But how about a discussion about a New York Times article describing the drone program in the Middle East. Or a discussion about the Wikileaks revelations? Or an email exchange discussing the revelations made by Edward Snowden and available to anyone with an internet connection? Or how about a supposed photograph of flying saucers hovering over Germany? One of those was classified for 26 years.

See, that's why classified documents have those classified markings. According to the FBI director, even experts look for classified markings on documents to determine the status of a document. But you know more than the FBI director, don't you Boilerman?


Has Forkie ever heard of leaks in the administration? That is how classified information gets into the hands of the media. They do a story, not knowing the information they are spouting is classified.

As one who held a Top Secret clearance, I think I can say without a doubt that if anyone other than "I need to be in prison for the rest of my life" Clinton, did the same thing they would be in prison.

To note: Everyone who has held a security clearance, knows about where to look for classification markings. FYI they are: top, bottom, front, back, each paragraph, and sentence. Not knowing, is NOT an excuse just another nail in the coffin to boot your ass out and NEVER have access to classified information, EVER AGAIN.

The law is rather clear, intent does not matter.

chafraho
chafraho
Jul 12, 2016
11:18am
Block User
Chef is dead on about this one. Anyone else that has ever had a security clearance also knows this. What they didn't tell us is that if your name is Hillary Clinton, you're exempt.
billryan
billryan
Jul 12, 2016
12:59pm
Block User
So on the one hand, we have chefanton saying he knows a crime was committed, and on the other we have fifteen of the FBIs top agents unanimously saying there wasn't.
Tough to choose which to believe. I'll have to think on this.
Roulette Man
Roulette Man
Jul 12, 2016
1:11pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: billryan
So on the one hand, we have chefanton saying he knows a crime was committed, and on the other we have fifteen of the FBIs top agents unanimously saying there wasn't.
Tough to choose which to believe. I'll have to think on this.


Fifteen agents? Really? Even the FBI admitted she lied and broke all of the rules. Why do you defend this piece of trash?
IndyBoilerman
IndyBoilerman
Jul 13, 2016
12:20am
Block User
Billy believes that free shit trumps all indiscretions.


Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
Quote
Originally posted by: billryan
So on the one hand, we have chefanton saying he knows a crime was committed, and on the other we have fifteen of the FBIs top agents unanimously saying there wasn't.
Tough to choose which to believe. I'll have to think on this.


Fifteen agents? Really? Even the FBI admitted she lied and broke all of the rules. Why do you defend this piece of trash?


Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now