Ferguson Grand Juror Sues Prosecutor

Quote

---

Originally posted by: hoops2
Actually the policy is stop QUESTION and frisk.

First the police would stop someone, then question the person. If there was a reason then they would frisk. Not every stop resulted in a frisk

The media shortened it to stop and frisk

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
I stand correct. Anyone who has ever worked a corporate job knows that employees will often find a way to work around stupid management orders. Cops have modified the procedure a tic, now call it something else, and they move right along. Good for them for keeping New Yorker's safe.

I still want to know why the Liberals don't bark about the large number of cops that patrol black neighborhoods. They don't do so in the white neighborhoods! This causes cops to arrest a disproportionate number of blacks, proving without a doubt that that the cops are racists. Liberals, take up the cause to make these black neighborhoods "Cop Free Zones".

Quote

---

Originally posted by: hoops2
Actually the policy is stop QUESTION and frisk.

First the police would stop someone, then question the person. If there was a reason then they would frisk. Not every stop resulted in a frisk

The media shortened it to stop and frisk

---

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: malibber2
You bring up a good point about the corporate environment. Malibber2 asks Boiler what would happen in a corporate environment to employees that turned their back on a company's CEO at a public event? So by all means lets handle this like a corporate environment and fire these cop's asses.

As to your point about their being more cops in poor areas I am not sure that is true. Could you cite some statistical evidence?
I can tell you in Indiana typically there are more cops per citizen in the wealthy well to do communities than in the poor ones.

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
I stand correct. Anyone who has ever worked a corporate job knows that employees will often find a way to work around stupid management orders. Cops have modified the procedure a tic, now call it something else, and they move right along. Good for them for keeping New Yorker's safe.

I still want to know why the Liberals don't bark about the large number of cops that patrol black neighborhoods. They don't do so in the white neighborhoods! This causes cops to arrest a disproportionate number of blacks, proving without a doubt that that the cops are racists. Liberals, take up the cause to make these black neighborhoods "Cop Free Zones".

Quote

---

Originally posted by: hoops2
Actually the policy is stop QUESTION and frisk.

First the police would stop someone, then question the person. If there was a reason then they would frisk. Not every stop resulted in a frisk

The media shortened it to stop and frisk

---

---

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: malibber2
You bring up a good point about the corporate environment. Malibber2 asks Boiler what would happen in a corporate environment to employees that turned their back on a company's CEO at a public event? So by all means lets handle this like a corporate environment and fire these cop's asses.

As to your point about their being more cops in poor areas I am not sure that is true. Could you cite some statistical evidence?
I can tell you in Indiana typically there are more cops per citizen in the wealthy well to do communities than in the poor ones.

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
I stand correct. Anyone who has ever worked a corporate job knows that employees will often find a way to work around stupid management orders. Cops have modified the procedure a tic, now call it something else, and they move right along. Good for them for keeping New Yorker's safe.

I still want to know why the Liberals don't bark about the large number of cops that patrol black neighborhoods. They don't do so in the white neighborhoods! This causes cops to arrest a disproportionate number of blacks, proving without a doubt that that the cops are racists. Liberals, take up the cause to make these black neighborhoods "Cop Free Zones".

Quote

---

Originally posted by: hoops2
Actually the policy is stop QUESTION and frisk.

First the police would stop someone, then question the person. If there was a reason then they would frisk. Not every stop resulted in a frisk

The media shortened it to stop and frisk

---

---

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: malibber2
You bring up a good point about the corporate environment. Malibber2 asks Boiler what would happen in a corporate environment to employees that turned their back on a company's CEO at a public event?

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
UAW employees could turn their backs on the CEO, fuck his daughter, kill his dog, get drunk at work each day, and still have a job.

Quote

---

Originally posted by: malibber2
You bring up a good point about the corporate environment. Malibber2 asks Boiler what would happen in a corporate environment to employees that turned their back on a company's CEO at a public event? So by all means lets handle this like a corporate environment and fire these cop's asses.

As to your point about their being more cops in poor areas I am not sure that is true. Could you cite some statistical evidence?
I can tell you in Indiana typically there are more cops per citizen in the wealthy well to do communities than in the poor ones.

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
I stand correct. Anyone who has ever worked a corporate job knows that employees will often find a way to work around stupid management orders. Cops have modified the procedure a tic, now call it something else, and they move right along. Good for them for keeping New Yorker's safe.

I still want to know why the Liberals don't bark about the large number of cops that patrol black neighborhoods. They don't do so in the white neighborhoods! This causes cops to arrest a disproportionate number of blacks, proving without a doubt that that the cops are racists. Liberals, take up the cause to make these black neighborhoods "Cop Free Zones".

Quote

---

Originally posted by: hoops2
Actually the policy is stop QUESTION and frisk.

First the police would stop someone, then question the person. If there was a reason then they would frisk. Not every stop resulted in a frisk

The media shortened it to stop and frisk

---

---

---

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: alanleroy

Quote

---

Originally posted by: malibber2
You bring up a good point about the corporate environment. Malibber2 asks Boiler what would happen in a corporate environment to employees that turned their back on a company's CEO at a public event?

---

If a corporate CEO has angered/demoralized his workforce to the point where many (if not most) turn their backs on him to publicly humiliate him, he would almost certainly be fired by the Board of Directors. I can't think of an instance of that ever happening though.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: MIKEY7777
Every cops goal is to kill a black person, and make the rest of his life a misery. Thats liberal thinking. Liberals have a new "war" on cops. 75 percent of us would have killed that thug, the other 25 percent would be dead, period!

---