Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrmeQuote
Originally posted by: arshaleign
Alas, Bill Clinton also fooled me with his lies about Lewinsky. And at first I was fooled when Bill O'Reily's claimed that he didn't sexually harass one of his employees while masturbating. You live and learn. I regret the errors.
Weiner lied to you and the rest of the world, repeatedly, on the air to anyone to would put him on camera and/or microphone for a week. He compromised his position as an elected member of Congress by engaging in behavior with multiple contacts that put him a serious position of being vulnerable to blackmail. He needs a private sector job where he doesn't compromise national security. I'd suggest Nathan's.
Quote
Originally posted by: arshaleign
But getting back to Clinton, I've often said that I'd accept dirtbaggery as long as it comes with a zero deficit budget, more jobs created in eight years than in the 20 years of Bush I, Bush II, a drastically reduced crime rate, etc. Alas Anthony Weiner, you may have just exposed yourself too soon.
20 years of Bush? I was unaware they both had 10-year terms. Zero budget deficit? Clinton said it would take 5,6,7,8,9,10 (or more) years to balance the budget depending on the speech. Congress did it for him during one of his terms, and he and you took credit for it.
Sorry, I forgot one name on that list. During the 8 years of the Clinton administration, more jobs were created than during the Bush I, Bush II, and REAGAN administrations. And yeah, that's 4 + 8 + 8 = 20 years.
Meanwhile, you're using the old "vulnerable to blackmail" line that you used to hear from the anti-gay bigots. Not at all surprised hearing it from you.
But here is my question to you (and all). What do you think of the Republicans in Congress calling for Weiner's resignation who are now not calling for Senator Vittter to resign (illegal solicitation of a prostitute, actual adultery) and failed to call for Senator Ensign to resign (coaching his parents to lie, actual adultery)? Gosh, don't you think they would have been "vulnerable to blackmail?"
