Fifty GOP National Security experts rip Trump.

Nothing to see here ,folks. Just fifty top GOP National Security experts calling Trump unhinged and unqualified.


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/08/08/us/politics/national-security-letter-trump.html
More than four dozen former Republican foreign policy officials have signed a letter declaring they are not voting for Donald Trump because it would put national security at risk.

“None of us will vote for Donald Trump,” reads the letter, signed by 50 veterans of the George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush and Richard Nixon administrations and published Monday by the New York Times. “From a foreign policy perspective, Donald Trump is not qualified to be President and Commander in Chief. Indeed, we are convinced that he would be a dangerous President and would put at risk our country’s national security and well-being.

“Most fundamentally,” the letter states, “Mr. Trump lacks the character, values, and experience to be President. He weakens U.S. moral authority as the leader of the free world. He appears to lack basic knowledge about and belief in the U.S. Constitution, U.S. laws, and U.S. institutions, including religious tolerance, freedom of the press, and an independent judiciary.”

Those who signed the letter include former Homeland Security Secs. Thomas Ridge and Michael Chertoff; former NSA and CIA Director Michael V. Hayden; ex-Deputy Secretaries of State John D. Negroponte and Robert B. Zoellick; and Eric S. Edelman, who served as Vice President Dick Cheney’s national security adviser and was a top aide to Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

The Trump campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump, their letter continues, has “demonstrated repeatedly that he has little understanding” of the nation’s “vital national interests, its complex diplomatic challenges, its indispensable alliances and the democratic values.” What’s more, the real estate mogul and former “Celebrity Apprentice” host “has shown no interest in educating himself” on crucial foreign policy issues.”

“He is unable or unwilling to separate truth from falsehood,” the letter adds. “He does not encourage conflicting views. He lacks self-control and acts impetuously. He cannot tolerate personal criticism. He has alarmed our closest allies with his erratic behavior. All of these are dangerous qualities in an individual who aspires to be president and commander in chief, with command of the U.S. nuclear arsenal.”

The stinging assessment of Trump’s national security proposals came on the heels of several apparent foreign policy gaffes, most notably the GOP nominee’s vow that Russian President Vladimir Putin would not invade Ukraine, despite the fact that Putin seized the Crimean Peninsula in 2014.

“He’s not going into Ukraine, OK, just so you understand,” Trump said in an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. “He’s not going to go into Ukraine, all right? You can mark it down. You can put it down. You can take it anywhere you want.”

“He’s already there, isn’t he?” Stephanopoulos responded.

Trump later clarified to say he was talking about Russia’s future actions under a potential Trump administration.

The Times noted that absent from the list of signatories are former Republican Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger, George P. Shultz, James A. Baker III, Colin L. Powell and Condoleezza Rice.

Earlier this year, Trump met with both Kissinger and Baker, telling the paper he “came away with a lot of knowledge” from the pair.

In March, more than 100 national security advisers signed a similar letter blasting Trump as a “fundamentally dishonest” candidate who “would use the authority of his office to act in ways that make America less safe.”

Monday’s missive was even more blunt.

“We understand that many Americans are profoundly frustrated with the federal government and its inability to solve pressing domestic and international problems,” the letter concludes. “We also know that many have doubts about Hillary Clinton, as do many of us. But Donald Trump is not the answer to America’s daunting challenges and to this crucial election. We are convinced that in the Oval Office, he would be the most reckless President in


So, if 150 of the GOP's top National Security Advisors want nothing to do with a Trump Presidency, where do you expert he will get his advise?
These are the people who gave us the Iraq War. Of course they support Hillary.
Have you found one piece of evidence that Trump was against the war yet? Just one. Anything that predates the invasion? I heard there was a bounty for it. That and the video of the thousands of Arabs celebrating in Jersey. on September 11th.
How about a statement from Pence recognizing the war was a mistake?

The war wasn't a mistake.
The management of the war......That was a god damned Greek tragedy.
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Have you found one piece of evidence that Trump was against the war yet? Just one. Anything that predates the invasion? I heard there was a bounty for it. That and the video of the thousands of Arabs celebrating in Jersey. on September 11th.
How about a statement from Pence recognizing the war was a mistake?
There's plenty of evidence that Trump did not support the Iraq War. We know with certainty Hillary did.

It also seems like her support of the 2011 Libyan intervention and Syrian policy and our role as the world's most generous policeman would be exactly what these GOP security 'experts' would support too.

Maybe it's time to rethink some of our interventionist policies and what's really in our national security interests and how much protecting the free world costs us. Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders are closer to my thinking on matters of War and National Security than Hawkish Hillary. I'm sure none of those GOP National Security advisors would vote for them either.
Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
The war wasn't a mistake.
The management of the war......That was a god damned Greek tragedy.


Very well said Cowboy.
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Have you found one piece of evidence that Trump was against the war yet? Just one. Anything that predates the invasion? I heard there was a bounty for it. That and the video of the thousands of Arabs celebrating in Jersey. on September 11th.
How about a statement from Pence recognizing the war was a mistake?
There's plenty of evidence that Trump did not support the Iraq War. We know with certainty Hillary did.

It also seems like her support of the 2011 Libyan intervention and Syrian policy and our role as the world's most generous policeman would be exactly what these GOP security 'experts' would support too.

Maybe it's time to rethink some of our interventionist policies and what's really in our national security interests and how much protecting the free world costs us. Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders are closer to my thinking on matters of War and National Security than Hawkish Hillary. I'm sure none of those GOP National Security advisors would vote for them either.



Please show one piece of evidence, pre-invasion, that Trump was against the war. Just one. It should be easy since you claim there is plenty.
A Google search of Was Trump against the Iraq war will give you lots of articles that show his claim is bullshit.
Mrs Clinton has said her vote was a mistake, even if she was mislead. Trump just made up a story and figures his supporters are too stupid to fact check him.
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
Have you found one piece of evidence that Trump was against the war yet? Just one. Anything that predates the invasion? I heard there was a bounty for it. That and the video of the thousands of Arabs celebrating in Jersey. on September 11th.
How about a statement from Pence recognizing the war was a mistake?
There's plenty of evidence that Trump did not support the Iraq War. We know with certainty Hillary did.

It also seems like her support of the 2011 Libyan intervention and Syrian policy and our role as the world's most generous policeman would be exactly what these GOP security 'experts' would support too.

Maybe it's time to rethink some of our interventionist policies and what's really in our national security interests and how much protecting the free world costs us. Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders are closer to my thinking on matters of War and National Security than Hawkish Hillary. I'm sure none of those GOP National Security advisors would vote for them either.



Please show one piece of evidence, pre-invasion, that Trump was against the war. Just one. It should be easy since you claim there is plenty.
I said there is plenty of evidence Trump did not support the War. You said 'pre invasion' not me. You want to change my words to 'There is no evidence that Trump Opposed the War Pre Invasion'. I'm just saying he didn't support it....and Hillary did.

"Trump expressed concerns about the cost of the war soon after it started. If Trump did support the war, he turned on it quickly. As the timeline below shows, Trump in July said that he wished the money being spent in Iraq could be spent in New York City. By November, he talked about the “tremendous cost” of the war and the “very, very unpleasant surprises in Iraq.

By 2004, Trump’s opposition to the war was well documented."

https://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/

I do know he was asked by Howard Stern if he supported it 6 months before the invasion and his response was 'I guess', which he long since said it was the first he really considered it and changed his mind quickly.

So...Beside these 2 words 'I guess' you should be able to post all kinds of quotes of Trump supporting the war from 2003 & 2004, Right? He didn't support it. Hillary did. That's all I'm claiming. He also didn't support the other failed mid east policies of Chicken Hawk Hillary....Policies that led to destabilizing Libya, Syria and Iraq.

Frankly these GOP National Security experts you tout are the very people who led us to the colossal mid east fail we have now. If you want another 4 years of that kind of thinking, then by all means vote for Hillary. I'm sure she'll have some other dictator on her hit list....and we can bring more democracy to the oppressed.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now