Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
In Summary we have:
- our intelligence agencies confirming Vladimir Putin was directly involved meddling with our election
- our intelligence agencies confirm his motivation was to elect one candidate
- our winning candidate has denied and ridiculed the collective intelligence from these agencies
- our winning candidate has massive amounts of financial ties to Russia
- the specifics of those ties are largely hidden in his undisclosed tax returns
- our winning candidate has nominated a Secretary of State with a cordial relationship with Vladimir Putin and has a negative disposition on current sanctions imposed against Russia
Damn! So many dots. So many lines. I'm sure glad Hillary doesn't have to explain them all.
We spent years trying to figure out what massive scandal was buried in Hillary Clinton's emails...and what nefarious role she played in attacking our base in Bengazhi. But the Email-gate witchhunters don't want to know anything about the KGB infiltrating our democratic process....or what ties our president-elect has to the financial institutions in one of the most tyrannical, anti-democratic, anti-civil-rights countries on the planet. And unlike Email-gate these are known issues we just don't have the specifics. And with partisan inbreeder, Trey Gowdy, in charge of the House Investigation Committee you can bet we wont be getting them anytime soon.
BS on on the call that Putin was directly responsible, all the news outlets have to go on right now is "that it had to be someone high up in the kremlin who directed the attack". Naming Putin is pure assumption.
