Fifty plus Electors ask to be briefed on election hack

Why isn't there an investigation and indictments coming for 52 precincts with a discrepancy of +5 or more votes reported? The only excuses I see are "old" voting machines (which are < 15 years old and used ~40 times) and voting judges who aren't smart enough. Really? And they haven't cross referenced voters to social security numbers yet - and probably never will to uncover even more fraud.

I don't think Wikileaks has ever printed anything proven untrue. The only person I can think of who disputed wiki during the the election was Donna Brazille and she made herself look like a huge ass in the denial while doing it when she was caught dead to rights about passing debate questions to Podesta. Did anyone deny any of the wiki releases (except a few on here)?

Funny how the CIA backed out of the meeting with the intel committee.

I also couldn't believe Josh Earnest press conference the other day, What a complete crock of bullshit speculation passing it off as a certainty. Even if it is true he has no way of knowing right now, the CIA hasn't released jack to anyone, including a congressional committee.

Amazing. This coming from the person who felt Hilarys emails were a national scandal. No speculation there, right?
The FBI agrees with the assessment. Seems like the only ones that don't are the usual suspects.

Summary of intel briefing on election hacking..."Nothing happened. Thanks, folks."

Apparently the (so far) lone Republican Elector-Defector has a sketchy past, . . . and a sketchy present.

Ref: WFAA - Dallas

He sounds more like a Democrat.