Quote
Originally posted by: pjstrohQuote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
The same guy that protesters stopped from speaking at Berkley just got stripped out of his CPAC speaking slot. He made some comments interpreted as being "Pro-pedophilia".
May DonDiego assume that the folks at the Conservative Political Action Conference did not set fires and break windows and achieve over $100,000 in damage from such vandalism, at least.
Probably. But whAt does that have to do with free speech? And the intolerant people who stop it?
To answer pjstroh's question: ". . . whAt does that have to do with free speech? And the intolerant people who stop it?"
Anyone who invites someone to speak at an event is free to cancel the invitation at any time. This has nothing to do with "free speech" being shut down. [See CPAC, above.]
Anyone who opposes someone, say someone invited to speak at a campus, is free to express that opposition and even demonstrate against the speaker. [Observe on-campus groups on most any day.]
Anyone who opposes a speaker through mob violence, . . . destroying property, setting fires, physically attacking those whom they oppose, . . . is violating the Law and, more specifically in this matter, . . . because the intent of the rioting is to stop the speaker, . . . violating the right of the invited speaker to speak. [Observe Berkely on 1 February 2017]