FSA Representative Opposes Mr. Trump

During the same week that Louisiana rapper Maine Muzik was visited by police for posting a video to his Instagram account where he, and a gang of thugs, showed off a stockpile of weapons, the young lad released a video threatening to kill Donald Trump because he supposes the presumptive Republican presidential nominee wants to take his “momma’s food stamps.”

*** NOT SAFE FOR WORK OR HOME OR SMALL TOWNS ***
*************OK FOR LA AND NYC******************

Ref: Maine Muzik VIDEO
Clickbait for stupid people. But I guess that's one way of getting semi-famous for a few minutes.

Of course there are thug assholes who are Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Libertarians, Greens, and so on. But only one of our major parties has a presidential candidate that actually encourages violence.
Yes those Bernie Bots are getting out of hand!
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
But only one of our major parties has a presidential candidate that actually encourages violence.
Indeed !

And repeatedly !

Like in Kosovo.
"After the Iraq Liberation Act came the 1999 Kosovo War, in which Bill Clinton called in NATO to bomb Belgrade, in the heart of Europe, and unleashing another decade of unrest in the Balkans. Hillary, traveling in Africa, called Bill: 'I urged him to bomb,' she told reporter Lucinda Frank.

And she even voted for War in Iraq!
"On October 11, 2002, Clinton joined a strong majority of Democrats in voting in favor of the Resolution authorizing the use of military force against Iraq.
[Of course, she's sorry now:!"As much as I might have wanted to, I could never change my vote on Iraq."
This sorta thing happens when one is running against a "peace candidate".]

And she really wanted to start a war against Colonel Muammar Qaddafi:
After meeting with a leader of the Libyan opposition in March 2011, . . .
"Her conviction would be critical in persuading Mr. Obama to join allies in bombing Colonel Qaddafi’s forces. In fact, Mr. Obama’s defense secretary, Robert M. Gates, would later say that in a '51-49' decision, it was Mrs. Clinton’s support that put the ambivalent president over the line.
The consequences would be more far-reaching than anyone imagined, leaving Libya a failed state and a terrorist haven, a place where the direst answers to Mrs. Clinton’s questions have come to pass.
Amid that fighting, the Islamic State has built its most important outpost on the Libyan shore, a redoubt to fall back upon as it is bombed in Syria and Iraq."
And was she happy ! ! !
" 'We came, we saw, he died,' she joked when told of news reports of Qaddafi's death by an aide in between formal interviews.
Clinton was in Tripoli earlier this week for talks with leaders of Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC).
The reporter asked if Qaddafi's death had anything to do with her surprise visit to show support for the Libyan people.
'No,' she replied, before rolling her eyes and saying 'I'm sure it did' with a chuckle.'
"

References:
__Huffington Post
__The New York Times
__CBS News

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
But only one of our major parties has a presidential candidate that actually encourages violence.
Indeed !

And repeatedly !

Like in Kosovo.
"After the Iraq Liberation Act came the 1999 Kosovo War, in which Bill Clinton called in NATO to bomb Belgrade, in the heart of Europe, and unleashing another decade of unrest in the Balkans. Hillary, traveling in Africa, called Bill: 'I urged him to bomb,' she told reporter Lucinda Frank.

And she even voted for War in Iraq!
"On October 11, 2002, Clinton joined a strong majority of Democrats in voting in favor of the Resolution authorizing the use of military force against Iraq.
[Of course, she's sorry now:!"As much as I might have wanted to, I could never change my vote on Iraq."
This sorta thing happens when one is running against a "peace candidate".]

And she really wanted to start a war against Colonel Muammar Qaddafi:
After meeting with a leader of the Libyan opposition in March 2011, . . .
"Her conviction would be critical in persuading Mr. Obama to join allies in bombing Colonel Qaddafi’s forces. In fact, Mr. Obama’s defense secretary, Robert M. Gates, would later say that in a '51-49' decision, it was Mrs. Clinton’s support that put the ambivalent president over the line.
The consequences would be more far-reaching than anyone imagined, leaving Libya a failed state and a terrorist haven, a place where the direst answers to Mrs. Clinton’s questions have come to pass.
Amid that fighting, the Islamic State has built its most important outpost on the Libyan shore, a redoubt to fall back upon as it is bombed in Syria and Iraq."
And was she happy ! ! !
" 'We came, we saw, he died,' she joked when told of news reports of Qaddafi's death by an aide in between formal interviews.
Clinton was in Tripoli earlier this week for talks with leaders of Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC).
The reporter asked if Qaddafi's death had anything to do with her surprise visit to show support for the Libyan people.
'No,' she replied, before rolling her eyes and saying 'I'm sure it did' with a chuckle.'
"

References:
__Huffington Post
__The New York Times
__CBS News
You forgot killing Osama bin Laden. I understand she was all in on that too.

And obviously I was referring to the major party candidate who has spoken out in favor of illegal violence at his campaign rallies.

There's only one, isn't there DonDiego?
Yes, if you spell Trump, "B-e-r-n-i-e".

https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-17/non-pology-bernie-sanders-condemns-general-violence-but-not-his-supporters
"And obviously I was referring to the major party candidate who has spoken out in favor of illegal violence at his campaign rallies"

Only 1 party is being violent at Trump rallies - democrats. See New Mexico last night
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
You forgot killing Osama bin Laden. I understand she was all in on that too.

And obviously I was referring to the major party candidate who has spoken out in favor of illegal violence at his campaign rallies.

There's only one, isn't there DonDiego?
Human Rights Watch concludes that as few as 489 and as many as 528 Yugoslav civilians were killed in the ninety separate incidents in Operation Allied Force over Kosovo in 1999.
[Bombing folks from high altitude is so much cleaner than getting involved in land combat, . . . but somewhat less precise.]

And, . . . Osama bin Laden is one in 2011.

Estimates of Libyan dead in "Hillary's War" range from 2000 (the World Health Organization total) to 15,000 (the UN Human Rights Council total) in 2011.
[They are either math-challenged or things just sorta got outta hand; that'll happen when one overthrows a dictator and all Hell breaks loose 'cause one doesn't have a plan.]

So that's at least 2490 dead by The Hillary's "involvement".

Unless DonDiego is mistaken Mr. Trump's total is approximately 0.
DonDiego requests an update on the dead caused by Mr. Trump, say, . . . about when it reaches, . . . say, around 1245, . . . that's half The Hillary's direct death toll.


Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
You forgot killing Osama bin Laden. I understand she was all in on that too.

And obviously I was referring to the major party candidate who has spoken out in favor of illegal violence at his campaign rallies.

There's only one, isn't there DonDiego?
Human Rights Watch concludes that as few as 489 and as many as 528 Yugoslav civilians were killed in the ninety separate incidents in Operation Allied Force over Kosovo in 1999.
[Bombing folks from high altitude is so much cleaner than getting involved in land combat, . . . but somewhat less precise.]

And, . . . Osama bin Laden is one in 2011.

Estimates of Libyan dead in "Hillary's War" range from 2000 (the World Health Organization total) to 15,000 (the UN Human Rights Council total) in 2011.
[They are either math-challenged or things just sorta got outta hand; that'll happen when one overthrows a dictator and all Hell breaks loose 'cause one doesn't have a plan.]

So that's at least 2490 dead by The Hillary's "involvement"...
So Hillary was the president in 1999? You learn something new every day. Of course Hillary voted to let the moron go to war in Iraq, so if "involvement" is the measure, she has a few hundred thousand deaths on her hand. As does every person who supported that invasion.

And speaking of the Democratic Kosovo War: It turned out slightly better than the Republican led Iraq War, didn't it? Somehow I don't think that comparison is something you're looking for DD.
Of course there are thug assholes who are Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Libertarians, Greens, and so on. But only one of our major parties has a presidential candidate that actually encourages violence.

Anyone want to seriously argue the point?
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now