GDP Falls by 2.9% in Q1 14

This is more fun than waiting for Obama to lie into the cameras again!
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Of course we didn't see chilcoot or his ilk shaming albeadle on that nasty thread, did we? You can apologize to me any time, asshole.
Apologize to you guys? Ha.

Could you be more thin-skinned? Look at how you've reacted to my mere post of yesterday's revised Q2 growth figures.

I always enjoy giving you two the opportunity to expose yourselves for who you are. And you come through again, calling me an "asshole".



Now back to my Wall Street Journal report on yesterday's terrific GDP figures
Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Of course we didn't see chilcoot or his ilk shaming albeadle on that nasty thread, did we? You can apologize to me any time, asshole.
Apologize to you guys? Ha. My whole point was to give you two an opportunity to expose yourselves for who you are. And you came through, calling me an "asshole".


But you are an asshole....or at least acting like one. What was your point again? Give me an opportunity to tell the truth about you? Mission Accomplished.

Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Of course we didn't see chilcoot or his ilk shaming albeadle on that nasty thread, did we? You can apologize to me any time, asshole.
Apologize to you guys? Ha.

Could you be more thin-skinned? Look at how you've reacted to my mere post of yesterday's revised Q2 growth figures.


How thin skinned I am? I point out that your addition to this thread of a minor GDP revision is insignificant and now you're trying to falsely associate me with racists. That's what assholes do. You proved exactly what you are.


Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
How thin skinned I am? I point out that your addition to this thread of a minor GDP revision is insignificant and now you're trying to falsely associate me with racists. That's what assholes do. You proved exactly what you are.
You misunderstand.

With this forum having been reduced to a plaything for racists, bigots, and xenophobes, you rarely (if ever?) object to their posts. That's all. I have no problem noting that I haven't seen anything that makes me believe you're a racist, bigot, or xenophobe.

But when I point out in a political thread started by you about quarterly GDP revisions that a new quarterly GDP revision indicates even stronger growth than previously estimated, you throw a fit. Namecalling, false characterizations about what I've written, the whole deal.

My update to your thread was an odd choice for criticism given the target-rich environment here.
"Whites in the South are substantially more prone to homicide than those in New England, but no one laments “Southerner-on-Southerner crime.” Why does crime involving people of African descent deserve its own special category?"

Blacks with 13% of the population account for 54% of homicides and 94% of those homicides are black on black
Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
You misunderstand.

With this forum having been reduced to a plaything for racists, bigots, and xenophobes, you rarely (if ever?) object to their posts. That's all. I have no problem noting that I haven't seen anything that makes me believe you're a racist, bigot, or xenophobe.



If ever? Since I just provided a link to a recent direct shaming of our resident racist troll, your agenda here is clear to all. Many times I have pointed out on this forum the wrongness of racial profiling by police. Many times I have pointed out racist posts. Now, out of the blue you claim that I do not object to racist, bigoted or xenophobic posts? It's pretty clear that your intent is a personal slander and a smear. Why the fuck else would you even mention such a thing?

Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
But when I point out in a political thread started by you about quarterly GDP revisions that a new quarterly GDP revision indicates even stronger growth than previously estimated, you throw a fit. Namecalling, false characterizations about what I've written, the whole deal.


Let's recap this. This was not started as a political thread. It was about the truly remarkable 1st quarter GDP revision. It was about Economics and Economic Reporting. You and others made it political. Now you post a minor revision to GDP and I point out exactly what it is....an insignificant change to a number already discussed. That's when you said:

"If that happens (referring to a possible future number), you can have your fun posting about Obama's Sharia-law driven destruction of the US economy."

...And I asked you to show where I have ever made any post remotely like this. And I called you a Liar....because you cannot show were I have ever made such a post. And I continued to show how the revision you posted was insignificant compared to 54 quarters of GDP revisions...until you eventually wrongly attacked me for not objecting to racist posts. A truly asshole move that had absolutely nothing to do with the discussion...It was merely your attempt at a personal character assassination. And I called you on it.



Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot

My update to your thread was an odd choice for criticism given the target-rich environment here.

Yes. I should have left this one alone. I just didn't see how that minor adjustment in GDP was relevant since the nice Q2 rebound was already discussed. That's the only point I was trying to make until you went all Sharia-law and Racist Bullshit on me.

You're some virgin.

"Oh goodness me, I didn't start a political thread!
I merely started a new thread about a bad Q1 GDP revision in a forum on a free internet site about Las Vegas called Vegas Free-For-All.
My stars, how on earth could that be seen as political?"




I follow up in subsequent months with updated figures, tossing in some snark about how you somehow don't find good figures worth reporting. On queue, you blow your top.



As for your namecalling as a substitute for discussion, I'd engage you on it if I had enough respect to care.
Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
You're some virgin.

"Oh goodness me, I didn't start a political thread!
I merely started a new thread about a bad Q1 GDP revision in a forum on a free internet site about Las Vegas called Vegas Free-For-All.
My stars, how on earth could that be seen as political?"


I follow up in subsequent months with updated figures, tossing in some snark about how you somehow don't find good figures worth reporting. On queue, you blow your top.


1. I started a thread about the largest GDP revision in years. I would have started it if it was a positive revision of that magnitude....because I have studied economics at many different levels. I thought it was an anomaly...an outlier and I was right. Nowhere did I blame your political party or our president. In fact, I blamed the weather.

Now you're acting like such a fucking political hack that you can't understand how someone could possibly discuss economics in a non political way. That's your problem, not mine.

2. You follow up with the 4% Q2 Number...which was a nice rebound. Which I also had predicted. I've got no problem with that. It was appropriate and pertinent. And something I had predicted....and something I certainly would have posted had you not beat me to it.

3. Now you follow up again with a meaningless Q2 adjustment which I point out as insignificant....since the 4% increase had already been discussed. Then you're the one who goes all ape shit. You throw Crap about me blaming Obama and Sharia Law for future declines...and then suggest I tolerate racism. Then sure...I called you a liar and an asshole...because that's exactly how you're behaving. I'm sorry you can't see that. I think you're blinded by your politics, but these are your major malfunctions not mine.


So much blubbering here, too much for me to deal with on a holiday eve. But I'll take this one . . . .
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Now you follow up again with a meaningless Q2 adjustment which I point out as insignificant....since the 4% increase had already been discussed.
Tell that to the Wall Street Journal, which disagrees.

It found yesterday's adjustment, which had never been discussed here, worthy of a report on page 1 of today's paper. Above the fold even.



Now put your economics dick back in your pants, no one wants to hear you brag about how long and thick it is.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now