Dim? Not me.
Quote
Originally posted by: albeadle33
I think the cookoo liberals here are really unhappy that Travon won't be around to collect his free living from the dem navigators. Oh wait. He'd have been in prison doing the same thing!
QuoteEven assuming your laughable characterization of Trayvon is accurate, here is a simple fact: If you murder a thug, you are guilty of...murder. Even if he wears a hoodie, or smokes pot, or gets into a fight at school - it's murder. And if he likes hardcore rap - you guessed it - it's still murder.
Originally posted by: treegirl
This still does not make Travon Martin an innocent young man. He was a thug.
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteEven assuming your laughable characterization of Trayvon is accurate, here is a simple fact: If you murder a thug, you are guilty of...murder. Even if he wears a hoodie, or smokes pot, or gets into a fight at school - it's murder. And if he likes hardcore rap - you guessed it - it's still murder.
Originally posted by: treegirl
This still does not make Travon Martin an innocent young man. He was a thug.
"Thugs," - even if they're uppity - have just as many civil rights as the rest of us. The only real question in this case is whether Zimmerman was the aggressor. At this point, the answer to that question should be obvious. Even to the dim and the prejudiced.
QuoteDitto OJ. But I have no respect for OJ's defenders. Same with Zimmerman's.
Originally posted by: Roulette ManQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteEven assuming your laughable characterization of Trayvon is accurate, here is a simple fact: If you murder a thug, you are guilty of...murder. Even if he wears a hoodie, or smokes pot, or gets into a fight at school - it's murder. And if he likes hardcore rap - you guessed it - it's still murder.
Originally posted by: treegirl
This still does not make Travon Martin an innocent young man. He was a thug.
"Thugs," - even if they're uppity - have just as many civil rights as the rest of us. The only real question in this case is whether Zimmerman was the aggressor. At this point, the answer to that question should be obvious. Even to the dim and the prejudiced.
What is laughable? There was enough evidence to create a reasonable doubt.