Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

George Zimmerman, Model Citizen

forkushV
forkushV
Nov 21, 2013
5:11am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: BillyBuckeye
A nagging question....

If Chilcoot truly believes most people that argue against him/her don't know what they are talking about or makes stupid statements, etc to the point where Chilcoot must typically belittle the person or their views - why does he/she even bother with such people that must be so far below Chilcoot's intellectual prowess that they don't really merit any attention from Chilcoot?

With such an extremely narrow field of vision, one would think Chilcoot wouldn't bother with such nonsensical people.

Many of us I'm sure have had to deal with people like this and have found they are truly insecure deep inside regardless of who they portray to be. Surely if Chilcoot truly believed others to be so far below him/her, there really wouldn't be a need for the continually insulting comments. Therein may possibly lay the truth behind it all.
Chilcoot, I'm jealous, you have your very own stalker! The above was pasted in response to you in two different threads. So far.
BillyBuckeye
BillyBuckeye
Nov 21, 2013
5:17am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BillyBuckeye
A nagging question....

If Chilcoot truly believes most people that argue against him/her don't know what they are talking about or makes stupid statements, etc to the point where Chilcoot must typically belittle the person or their views - why does he/she even bother with such people that must be so far below Chilcoot's intellectual prowess that they don't really merit any attention from Chilcoot?

With such an extremely narrow field of vision, one would think Chilcoot wouldn't bother with such nonsensical people.

Many of us I'm sure have had to deal with people like this and have found they are truly insecure deep inside regardless of who they portray to be. Surely if Chilcoot truly believed others to be so far below him/her, there really wouldn't be a need for the continually insulting comments. Therein may possibly lay the truth behind it all.
Chilcoot, I'm jealous, you have your very own stalker! The above was pasted in response to you in two different threads. So far.


Wow...again, I expected more.

Two threads equal stalking? Interesting take.

forkushV
forkushV
Nov 21, 2013
5:43am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: BillyBuckeye
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BillyBuckeye
A nagging question....

If Chilcoot truly believes most people that argue against him/her don't know what they are talking about or makes stupid statements, etc to the point where Chilcoot must typically belittle the person or their views - why does he/she even bother with such people that must be so far below Chilcoot's intellectual prowess that they don't really merit any attention from Chilcoot?

With such an extremely narrow field of vision, one would think Chilcoot wouldn't bother with such nonsensical people.

Many of us I'm sure have had to deal with people like this and have found they are truly insecure deep inside regardless of who they portray to be. Surely if Chilcoot truly believed others to be so far below him/her, there really wouldn't be a need for the continually insulting comments. Therein may possibly lay the truth behind it all.
Chilcoot, I'm jealous, you have your very own stalker! The above was pasted in response to you in two different threads. So far.


Wow...again, I expected more.

Two threads equal stalking? Interesting take.
Nah, I was being sarcastic. Next time I'll include closed captions for the humor impaired.

But responding to the same person almost simultaneously on two unrelated threads? Odd? Weird? Redundant? I know, I'll use treeegirl's word of the day: Creepy!
BillyBuckeye
BillyBuckeye
Nov 21, 2013
5:49am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BillyBuckeye
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: BillyBuckeye
A nagging question....

If Chilcoot truly believes most people that argue against him/her don't know what they are talking about or makes stupid statements, etc to the point where Chilcoot must typically belittle the person or their views - why does he/she even bother with such people that must be so far below Chilcoot's intellectual prowess that they don't really merit any attention from Chilcoot?

With such an extremely narrow field of vision, one would think Chilcoot wouldn't bother with such nonsensical people.

Many of us I'm sure have had to deal with people like this and have found they are truly insecure deep inside regardless of who they portray to be. Surely if Chilcoot truly believed others to be so far below him/her, there really wouldn't be a need for the continually insulting comments. Therein may possibly lay the truth behind it all.
Chilcoot, I'm jealous, you have your very own stalker! The above was pasted in response to you in two different threads. So far.


Wow...again, I expected more.

Two threads equal stalking? Interesting take.

But responding to the same person almost simultaneously on two unrelated threads? Odd? Weird? Redundant? I know, I'll use treeegirl's word of the day: Creepy!


OK...now that made me laugh. Good stuff.
Actually, just gets so tiresome of having to read how people don't know what they're talking about or posts are dumb, stupid, etc - had to give it a go and want to make sure there'd be a response.

Gotta hand it to you to stick up for someone so quickly and vehemently.


Don
Don
Nov 21, 2013
5:53am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
But responding to the same person almost simultaneously on two unrelated threads? Odd? Weird? Redundant? I know, I'll use treeegirl's word of the day: Creepy!

And forkushV responded to both of BillyBuckeye's "redundant" threads.

Creep-i-tatious, indeed !

Roulette Man
Roulette Man
Nov 21, 2013
6:22am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: treegirl
Quote
Originally posted by: Number51
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
So when I see 7 to 10 quotes attributed to me, you took the time to Google each one and cut and paste it in one post?


Quote
Originally posted by: treegirl
Of course he has them on file. C & P'ing posts are internet trolls scrapbooking. He just needs to learn to copy the entire post or the reason behind the words..then he wouldn't be as creepy. Still plenty creepy though.
Maybe we are his only friends and he really doesn't have anything else to do.


They are quoting posts off this forum. I don't understand the outrage.

Turn the tables, throw their own words back at them. They even told you how to do it. Sounds easy.


Wrong! Partial quotes.
Partial quotes can be on point and utterly honest, or they can be deceptive. I always aim for honest, and if you say I have been otherwise, you should back up your claim. But "partial quote" isn't an epithet, it's a very normal construct in communication.

And I can't believe that needs to be explained to an adult.


[sarcasm]Nah, you would never take anybody's quote out of context [/sarcasm]. You continue to surprise me every day.
Roulette Man
Roulette Man
Nov 21, 2013
6:24am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: Chilcoot
Quote
Originally posted by: Roulette Man
You may not see anything wrong with it, but most do. It shows someone who is way too wrapped up on this board.
Says the guy who has posted (at last count) 7,783 posts in this forum since March 2005, an average of over 2.4 posts per day every day for close to NINE YEARS lol.



Wow. 2.4 posts per day. That is an average of .1 posts per hour. Is that seriously your argument?
Dan Svatass
Dan Svatass
Nov 21, 2013
6:52am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: BillyBuckeye
A nagging question....

If Chilcoot truly believes most people that argue against him/her don't know what they are talking about or makes stupid statements, etc to the point where Chilcoot must typically belittle the person or their views - why does he/she even bother with such people that must be so far below Chilcoot's intellectual prowess that they don't really merit any attention from Chilcoot?
Fair question (though I note you then follow it by engaging in precisely what you accuse me of, but let's move on).

These forums keep demonstrating my pet theory that some people repeatedly say things that are demonstrably false. A corollary to my theory is that there's a strong positive correlation between such people and the people who dislike America's current president.

My theory's not yet perfected, we still have some Dennis Kuciniches, Steve Schmidts, Adam Carollas, Carol Moseley Brauns, and Todd Harrisses to account for, but it's pretty tight.

And so every time you see me note another ridiculous gem from the likes of some of the well-known clowns who spew total unsubstantiated bullshit here as a means of acting out their frustration at losing the America of their dreams that never was, think of me exclaiming "EUREKA!" as I add another data point to the set.
malibber2
malibber2
Nov 21, 2013
7:55am
Block User
Zim Zim is a low intellect gun nut fetishist with violent tendencies. - I don't think that surprises anyone that is honest with themselves. NRA folks put armed low intellect gun nut fetishists with violent tendencies on patrol in public places and bad things happened and will happen as a result of this. What surprises me is people are surprised by things like this.
Toomany10pins
Toomany10pins
Nov 23, 2013
5:10am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
His girlfriend was wearing a hoodie, so it's cool.


but the real question is, was she armed with skittles and an iced tea? That changes everything.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now