Twisting the facts and lying again I see. Isn't the Liberal stance strong enough to discuss things truthfully? Apparently not.
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Ain't religious freedom great?
Originally posted by: forkushV
QuoteOr patients who are adulterers? Or who take the Lord's name in vain? Or who wear blended fabrics? Or who have tattoos? Or who worship graven images? Or who need psych drugs (Scientology)? Or women who don't wear a burqa?
Originally posted by: snidely333Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2Quote
Originally posted by: alanleroy
Here is my question: In a state that has no 'Religious Freedom' law, can a gay couple successfully sue the Catholic (or name your flavor) Church because it refuses to perform marriage services for gay couples? If not, why not?
Is this a church/state first amendment issue applied only to recognized churches but not to businesses or to individuals? Does it apply to services offered by church owned businesses like Hospitals and Medical Centers and Universities?
The Catholic Church can and has refused to marry people for hundreds of years for a variety of reasons and they can continue to do so. This was never even an issue.
When you get to a church owned businesses like a hospital it gets to be a trickier issue. Is the hospital a profit or non-profit enterprise and does the hospital accept state or federal taxpayer funding? If they do it generally it means they have to be willing to serve all taxpayers for services they normally provide.
What about individual employees of said taxpayer funded hospital? What if a doctor or nurse doesn't want to care for a gay patient based on their religious beliefs?
Ain't religious freedom great?




