Vegas Free-for-All - Governor Pence finally did it (POL)

Governor Pence finally did it (POL)

pjstroh

Apr 7, 2015
6:45am

Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
This was posted by PJ earlier today.

"Discrimination: (n) 1. treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit."

Would PJ now explain why a gay man refusing to do business with a straight man is not discrimination. PJ, you and I know that Liberals are fulling accepting of discrimination, just depending on which group is getting screwed.

Now, let's thoughts again on discrimination.

Absolutely!

And By liberals you mean the Republican mayor of Indianapolis, the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, and ceo's of fortune 100 companies....and me.

Boilerman

Apr 7, 2015
6:52am

Block User

So PJ, which folks are allowed to discriminate.........by the definition that you were so nice to cut and paste into the earlier post.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
This was posted by PJ earlier today.

"Discrimination: (n) 1. treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit."

Would PJ now explain why a gay man refusing to do business with a straight man is not discrimination. PJ, you and I know that Liberals are fulling accepting of discrimination, just depending on which group is getting screwed.

Now, let's thoughts again on discrimination.

Absolutely!

And By liberals you mean the Republican mayor of Indianapolis, the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, and ceo's of fortune 100 companies....and me.

pjstroh

Apr 7, 2015
6:56am

Block User

No business owners. None. Consult the new law - or ask Mike Pence. The only people left fighting for that right are you ....and the laws original backers who are admittedly pejudiced

Boilerman

Apr 7, 2015
12:17pm

Block User

PJ's post.

"Discrimination: (n) 1. treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit."

I'm not talking about he Indiana law, and I suspect that PJ knows that. Given your post about what discrimination is, is it acceptable that gay folks direct the great majority of their business to other gays?

PJ, we all know that you won't answer directly, but instead dodge, dodge, dodge. Maybe a little dancing will be included.

jphelan

Apr 7, 2015
1:30pm

Block User

The "war on women" is officially over - replaced by the war on Christians. The latest battles in this was war were the murder of ~150 Christians in Kenya and death threats to Christians who own a Pizza parlor in Indiana. Somehow, I think the war on Christians will have many more fatalities than the "War on Women".

Boilerman

Apr 7, 2015
10:22pm

Block User

PJ, as expected you won't answer the question.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
No business owners. None. Consult the new law - or ask Mike Pence. The only people left fighting for that right are you ....and the laws original backers who are admittedly pejudiced

pjstroh

Apr 8, 2015
12:49am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
PJ's post.

"Discrimination: (n) 1. treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit."

I'm not talking about he Indiana law, and I suspect that PJ knows that. Given your post about what discrimination is, is it acceptable that gay folks direct the great majority of their business to other gays?

I know you are not talking about the law..because when you do talk about the law you say false things which I refute.

I've answered your off-topic question....and I'll do it again. Yes, it is 100% fine for a gay man to only give his business to a gay business.....or a white supremacist to only give his business to a white supremacist business. Nobody in American history has ever argued this is a problem until this thread where you desperately try to equate business discrimination to consumer discretion.

I dont need to dance. I can point and laugh.

****** posted edited to bold underline my answer to Boilerman's off-topic, foot-stomping question

Boilerman

Apr 8, 2015
1:17am

Block User

What I'm looking for and PJ keeps dancing away from, is it moral to discriminate. This includes a white man refusing to do business at the local business because of the color of the black owners skin, AND a gay man refusing to business with a man because of his sexual preference.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
PJ's post.

"Discrimination: (n) 1. treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit."

I'm not talking about he Indiana law, and I suspect that PJ knows that. Given your post about what discrimination is, is it acceptable that gay folks direct the great majority of their business to other gays?

I know you are not talking about the law..because when you do talk about the law you say false things which I refute.

I've answered your off-topic question....and I'll do it again. Yes, it is 100% fine for a gay man to only give his business to a gay business.....or a white supremacist to only give his business to a white supremacist business. Nobody in American history has ever argued this is a problem until this thread where you desperately try to equate business discrimination to consumer discretion.

I dont need to dance. I can point and laugh.

pjstroh

Apr 8, 2015
2:58am

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
What I'm looking for and PJ keeps dancing away from, is it moral to discriminate. This includes a white man refusing to do business at the local business because of the color of the black owners skin, AND a gay man refusing to business with a man because of his sexual preference.

I edited my last post and bold-underlined my answer to the question you keep insisting I didn't answer. I dont know what else I can do for you.

But I'm glad to see if you've gone back to your normal pattern of asking querstions instead of stating facts. When you truied to state facts earlier on this thread you said ridiculous things - liket he Indaina Law was not meant to discriminate. Best you stick to questions. And I'm glad to help!

Boilerman

Apr 8, 2015
3:03am

Block User

Last question. Is it moral?

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
What I'm looking for and PJ keeps dancing away from, is it moral to discriminate. This includes a white man refusing to do business at the local business because of the color of the black owners skin, AND a gay man refusing to business with a man because of his sexual preference.

«‹20 ›»

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now