Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

Gun Salesman of the Century

alanleroy
alanleroy
Jan 7, 2016
2:40am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
None of the proposed rules would have prevented Sandy Hook...
The ammunition that these children and teachers were killed with is now illegal in Connecticut.


You are misinformed.......and wrong.
CowboyKell, who once said he believed something "just because" weighs in, and the dip believes him.

The ammosexual who killed the kids below used a clip that held 30 bullets, which was legal to purchase at the time. Because freedom. Like I said, those are now illegal in Connecticut.


I'm not speaking about semantics. You can call it ammo or bullets or anything else that is readily understood to mean the projectiles that ultimately come out the end of a 'gun' (or rifle, or firearm, or whatever). The same with the 'magazine' or clip, or any other term that is readily understood. Even the firearm itself, assault rifle, long rifle, gun.

It is still perfectly legal in the state of Connecticut to buy sell or own the same ammo, the same magazines and the same weapon now as it was before. Gun laws are almost always poorly written by lawmakers who do not truly understand the subject they are trying to regulate.
If you would like to educate yourself on the matter I would suggest looking up things like 80%, bullet buttons and mag blocks.

Or...you could go on believing only with your heart and without logical thought as a balance.
Even if he was right, that $80 fine for illegal possession of a High Capacity Magazine isn't going to stop many mass murderers.

hoops2
hoops2
Jan 7, 2016
4:23am
Block User
Like most liberals forky doesn't know what he is talking about in regards to gun control
Boilerman
Boilerman
Jan 7, 2016
5:51am
Block User
Here is my question. Should a president be able to create any policy via executive action? And if a president can create policy which is against the law, can a president create any policy which is against the law?

Be careful what you wish for.


Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: Boilerman
Once you're done name calling, please answer my question. Does an American president have any limit to his executive actions. Could a radical politician simply not enforce murder laws after a black man is killed, for example?

If one law can be ignored or created by a president, can't any law be ignored or created by a president?




You didn;t ask a question, Boiler. You made up a lie about what the definition of a "law" is and now want to discuss it on this message board. And you did the same thing when the president issued an Executvie order over immigration. I'm not qualified to engage that discussion. My IQ isn't low enough.


pjstroh
pjstroh
Jan 7, 2016
8:22am
Block User

forkushV
forkushV
Jan 7, 2016
9:00am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
None of the proposed rules would have prevented Sandy Hook...
The ammunition that these children and teachers were killed with is now illegal in Connecticut.


You are misinformed.......and wrong.
CowboyKell, who once said he believed something "just because" weighs in, and the dip believes him.

The ammosexual who killed the kids below used a clip that held 30 bullets, which was legal to purchase at the time. Because freedom. Like I said, those are now illegal in Connecticut.


I'm not speaking about semantics. You can call it ammo or bullets or anything else that is readily understood to mean the projectiles that ultimately come out the end of a 'gun' (or rifle, or firearm, or whatever). The same with the 'magazine' or clip, or any other term that is readily understood. Even the firearm itself, assault rifle, long rifle, gun.

It is still perfectly legal in the state of Connecticut to buy sell or own the same ammo, the same magazines and the same weapon now as it was before. Gun laws are almost always poorly written by lawmakers who do not truly understand the subject they are trying to regulate.
If you would like to educate yourself on the matter I would suggest looking up things like 80%, bullet buttons and mag blocks.

Or...you could go on believing only with your heart and without logical thought as a balance.
My source is Reuters. What's yours?
chafraho
chafraho
Jan 7, 2016
9:27am
Block User
It ain't the guns. It's the (how was it phrased?) "felon/psychotic" individuals that kill. As far as I can tell, it is neither political party nor independent voters that endorse "felon/psychotic" behavior. If you please, remind me of which political element supported and then legislated the early release of the felonious element into at-large communities, and that promoted the elimination of secure facilities to contain the psychiatrically impaired population that posed high risks to communities-at-large.
hoops2
hoops2
Jan 7, 2016
11:50am
Block User
As usual not true. Obama has issued an unprecedented number of executive memorandums which carry the force of an executive order. When you combine the orders and memorandums, he has issued more of these in 6 years than any other president did in 8 years.

Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh


alanleroy
alanleroy
Jan 7, 2016
11:59am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh

This is incredibly simplistic. It's not the quantity of executive orders that's in dispute....it's their content...their substance.

Most orders are benign and simply implement action to fulfill executive responsibility...like establish commissions and councils or refine succession of departments or order negotiations in labor disputes that impact national interests.

Some executive orders are profound and far reaching....Like Lincoln's emancipation proclamation or Roosevelt's WPA or Eisenhower's desegregation of Schools.

Some executive orders undermine and usurp the authority of congress....and do not pass constitutional muster. FDR issued the most executive orders totaling over 3500. Washington had 8.

A comparison of the number of orders is meaningless without examining their content. There are only a handful from recent presidents that are controversial....but that's where the focus should be...not who succeeds the Secretary of Agriculture in the event of his untimely death.

Here's a list for further reading...

nullList of Executive Orders
CowboyKell
CowboyKell
Jan 7, 2016
12:33pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
None of the proposed rules would have prevented Sandy Hook...
The ammunition that these children and teachers were killed with is now illegal in Connecticut.


You are misinformed.......and wrong.
CowboyKell, who once said he believed something "just because" weighs in, and the dip believes him.

The ammosexual who killed the kids below used a clip that held 30 bullets, which was legal to purchase at the time. Because freedom. Like I said, those are now illegal in Connecticut.


I'm not speaking about semantics. You can call it ammo or bullets or anything else that is readily understood to mean the projectiles that ultimately come out the end of a 'gun' (or rifle, or firearm, or whatever). The same with the 'magazine' or clip, or any other term that is readily understood. Even the firearm itself, assault rifle, long rifle, gun.

It is still perfectly legal in the state of Connecticut to buy sell or own the same ammo, the same magazines and the same weapon now as it was before. Gun laws are almost always poorly written by lawmakers who do not truly understand the subject they are trying to regulate.
If you would like to educate yourself on the matter I would suggest looking up things like 80%, bullet buttons and mag blocks.

Or...you could go on believing only with your heart and without logical thought as a balance.
My source is Reuters. What's yours?


nullConnecticut judicial branch law libraries

forkushV
forkushV
Jan 7, 2016
3:51pm
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
None of the proposed rules would have prevented Sandy Hook...
The ammunition that these children and teachers were killed with is now illegal in Connecticut.


You are misinformed.......and wrong.
CowboyKell, who once said he believed something "just because" weighs in, and the dip believes him.

The ammosexual who killed the kids below used a clip that held 30 bullets, which was legal to purchase at the time. Because freedom. Like I said, those are now illegal in Connecticut.


I'm not speaking about semantics. You can call it ammo or bullets or anything else that is readily understood to mean the projectiles that ultimately come out the end of a 'gun' (or rifle, or firearm, or whatever). The same with the 'magazine' or clip, or any other term that is readily understood. Even the firearm itself, assault rifle, long rifle, gun.

It is still perfectly legal in the state of Connecticut to buy sell or own the same ammo, the same magazines and the same weapon now as it was before. Gun laws are almost always poorly written by lawmakers who do not truly understand the subject they are trying to regulate.
If you would like to educate yourself on the matter I would suggest looking up things like 80%, bullet buttons and mag blocks.

Or...you could go on believing only with your heart and without logical thought as a balance.
My source is Reuters. What's yours?


nullConnecticut judicial branch law libraries
From YOUR site:

"Anyone, except a servicemember, who moves into Connecticut in lawful possession of an LCM [large capacity magazine] has 90 days to either permanently disable it, sell it to a gun dealer, or take it out of state (CGS ยง 53-202x(d))."
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now