That's a tough one. If only there were a mechanism that would allow someone to sell a stock as it loses value.
Real life example. I own enough ATT that I make $50,000 a year in dividends.
I am currently pulling just $10,000 from it, as it is one of a handful of such dividend stocks I own as a result of a long term investment strategy.
Let's say ATT is currently at $40. Does it matter to me if it goes up 20% or down 20%? I'm actually better off with it going down 20% because that just means my reinvesting buys me more of the cheaper shares.
I no longer have to worry about short term fluctuations because all I care about is their dividends, which through forty plus years of stock market flurries and three or more recessions have never once decreased. The stock itself is up nicely, not counting dividends.
In 2000, I owned GM. By 2005, it was obvious it was in a death spiral and I sold it at a small loss. Luckily, it was one of about two dozen stocks I owned so the loss was made up elsewhere. In 2008, thanks to a little thing called stop loss, my losses across the board were much smaller than the markets. Being able to buy companies like Ford and Sunrise in 2009 for less than a cup of coffee more than made up for the losses and my portfolio today is triple what it was in 2007.
Or I could have it in bonds and have lost spending power due to inflation. No Bragg, just fact.
Put all your money in one stock, price fluctuations affect you. Have a nice blend of dividend stocks and chances are one will go up just as another goes down. You aren't touching principal, only dividends.
Is it what a banker will recommend? Of course not. He wants you to put your million into his bank so it can play with your money.
Real life example. I own enough ATT that I make $50,000 a year in dividends.
I am currently pulling just $10,000 from it, as it is one of a handful of such dividend stocks I own as a result of a long term investment strategy.
Let's say ATT is currently at $40. Does it matter to me if it goes up 20% or down 20%? I'm actually better off with it going down 20% because that just means my reinvesting buys me more of the cheaper shares.
I no longer have to worry about short term fluctuations because all I care about is their dividends, which through forty plus years of stock market flurries and three or more recessions have never once decreased. The stock itself is up nicely, not counting dividends.
In 2000, I owned GM. By 2005, it was obvious it was in a death spiral and I sold it at a small loss. Luckily, it was one of about two dozen stocks I owned so the loss was made up elsewhere. In 2008, thanks to a little thing called stop loss, my losses across the board were much smaller than the markets. Being able to buy companies like Ford and Sunrise in 2009 for less than a cup of coffee more than made up for the losses and my portfolio today is triple what it was in 2007.
Or I could have it in bonds and have lost spending power due to inflation. No Bragg, just fact.
Put all your money in one stock, price fluctuations affect you. Have a nice blend of dividend stocks and chances are one will go up just as another goes down. You aren't touching principal, only dividends.
Is it what a banker will recommend? Of course not. He wants you to put your million into his bank so it can play with your money.