Hard Times Ahead, . . .

The Clinton Foundation discloses all of it's finances? How funny.

And true!
Clinton FOundation donor information website

Lets be honest, Boiler. Despite all of your empty "Hillary is a crook" rhetoric - the fact is she is exponentially more transparent and ethical than the sexual predator/business fraudster you just voted for.

And we are going to see over the next 4 years that just like DonDiego - your intolerance for dishonesty...and non-transparency....and conflicts of interest....and pay-for-play politics is limited to the baseless conspiracies you made up about Hillary Clinton for political reasons.

In reality scumbags in Washington don't bother you much so long as they have an "R" by their name.

Why would PJ choose to believe Hillary after she lied to him regarding emails?

I provide facts with links and Boiler provides unfounded conspiracy. Par for the course.

Boilerman is already mum about Trump's for-profit enterprise sitting footsteps away from the White House with no obligation to disclose its financials. And we can expect it to stay that way.

PJ, your blind support for not one, but a married pair of liars is something to behold. I cannot recall any political pair so at odds with truth telling, and yet you jump to their defense. You can now sit back, relax and enjoy your role as detractor for 4 years. I very much look forward to your whining. Hello shoe, please meet other foot.

Fritz invented the name "Liary" and then voted for someone who promises Mexico will build a wall along the Rio Grande. It doesn't get any more priceless

Hard times ahead for every except the 1% under the rule of Orange Adolf.
Bone up on your Russian! Putin's calling the shots starting Jan. 20th.

Thanks Rubes, this one is on you!


Did I do that right alt-righties????

PJ With the thread win!

"..the fact is she is exponentially more transparent and ethical.." You gotta be shittin'
me on this one, I'm surprised you weren't choking on yourself as you typed the complete nonsense.

Her decision to keep everything completely private between her and her staff is what got her in trouble when she decided to have a home brew server. None of that pesky redundant record keeping that would be subject to any prying eyes, even the State Dept.s' eyes. Certainly didn't need any of that. She was attempting to be anything BUT transparent let alone exponentially transport, hell, she was trying to make sure everything single solitary thing she and her staff did were nowhere close to public record and she damn well achieved it too. When the shit hit the fan, they had control of everything and nuked those 33K emails (which were under congressional subpoena btw). As far as ethics go, I certainly wouldn't put her up any pedestal proclaiming her clean as the virgin snow. All that foreign money that flowed into the CF from countries with the same horrible human rights violations that she said was championing in this country, you know, womens rights, lgbt, blah blah blah.

You ever see this vid when the Hill first took on at State and circulated this video to all employees on the importance to follow procedure, cybersecurity, etc., etc. ? Might wanna give it a watch and come bak again with all her "exponentially more transparency " claim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDBix0AlJ2E

I also wanted to add RE prosecution over the whole perjury, destruction of evidence, email thing. PJ, Forky, billy and others are all in the camp that it was all baseless, 'cause Comey and Lynch said so, well they said they wouldn't prosecute. Do you all honestly beleive her defense could withstand a prosecutor who actually went after her, like a Rudy G. or such? Shoot, it wouldn't even have to be that great of a prosecutor. No way in hell, bare minimum perjury and destruction of evidence under subpoena.

Rudy G? You might want to learn something about him before you stick him on an alter.