Hard Times Ahead, . . .

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Hmm, . . . DonDiego wonders what could possibly have happened to cause such a collapse in the charitable feelings of the Norwegian Government ? ? ?

Hmm, . . . DonDiego wonders what could possibly have happened to cause such a collapse in the charitable feelings of the Australian Government ? ? ?

DonDiego was just puzzled by the change in heart of two benevolent Governments.

And now there's all this chatter about "scandal" and "dishonesty" and "non-transparency" and "conflicts of interest" and "pay-for-play politics"?
Where'd that come from ?
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Hmm, . . . DonDiego wonders what could possibly have happened to cause such a collapse in the charitable feelings of the Norwegian Government ? ? ?

Hmm, . . . DonDiego wonders what could possibly have happened to cause such a collapse in the charitable feelings of the Australian Government ? ? ?

DonDiego was just puzzled by the change in heart of two benevolent Governments.

And now there's all this chatter about "scandal" and "dishonesty" and "non-transparency" and "conflicts of interest" and "pay-for-play politics"?
Where'd that come from ?
It must be fake news from Russia.

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Hmm, . . . DonDiego wonders what could possibly have happened to cause such a collapse in the charitable feelings of the Norwegian Government ? ? ?

Hmm, . . . DonDiego wonders what could possibly have happened to cause such a collapse in the charitable feelings of the Australian Government ? ? ?

DonDiego was just puzzled by the change in heart of two benevolent Governments.

And now there's all this chatter about "scandal" and "dishonesty" and "non-transparency" and "conflicts of interest" and "pay-for-play politics"?
Where'd that come from ?



It came from your post: "The federal government confirmed to news.com.au it has not renewed any of its partnerships with the scandal-plagued Clinton Foundation"

Although DonDiego and his source failed to explain what the big scandal is. I guess the reader is just supposed to presume one exists - sorta like BENGAZHI !
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
The Clinton Foundation discloses all of it's finances? How funny.



And true!
Clinton FOundation donor information website

Lets be honest, Boiler. Despite all of your empty "Hillary is a crook" rhetoric - the fact is she is exponentially more transparent and ethical than the sexual predator/business fraudster you just voted for.

And we are going to see over the next 4 years that just like DonDiego - your intolerance for dishonesty...and non-transparency....and conflicts of interest....and pay-for-play politics is limited to the baseless conspiracies you made up about Hillary Clinton for political reasons.

In reality scumbags in Washington don't bother you much so long as they have an "R" by their name.


"..the fact is she is exponentially more transparent and ethical.." You gotta be shittin'
me on this one, I'm surprised you weren't choking on yourself as you typed the complete nonsense.

Her decision to keep everything completely private between her and her staff is what got her in trouble when she decided to have a home brew server. None of that pesky redundant record keeping that would be subject to any prying eyes, even the State Dept.s' eyes. Certainly didn't need any of that. She was attempting to be anything BUT transparent let alone exponentially transport, hell, she was trying to make sure everything single solitary thing she and her staff did were nowhere close to public record and she damn well achieved it too. When the shit hit the fan, they had control of everything and nuked those 33K emails (which were under congressional subpoena btw). As far as ethics go, I certainly wouldn't put her up any pedestal proclaiming her clean as the virgin snow. All that foreign money that flowed into the CF from countries with the same horrible human rights violations that she said was championing in this country, you know, womens rights, lgbt, blah blah blah.

You ever see this vid when the Hill first took on at State and circulated this video to all employees on the importance to follow procedure, cybersecurity, etc., etc. ? Might wanna give it a watch and come bak again with all her "exponentially more transparency " claim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDBix0AlJ2E

I also wanted to add RE prosecution over the whole perjury, destruction of evidence, email thing. PJ, Forky, billy and others are all in the camp that it was all baseless, 'cause Comey and Lynch said so, well they said they wouldn't prosecute. Do you all honestly beleive her defense could withstand a prosecutor who actually went after her, like a Rudy G. or such? Shoot, it wouldn't even have to be that great of a prosecutor. No way in hell, bare minimum perjury and destruction of evidence under subpoena.


I'll make it simple for you, Jatki, since you seem to be struggling.

Boiler claimed the Clinton Foundation is not transparent with its donors. In fact it is. I showed him (and you) the list. And that's why her "scandal" is able to be perpetuated by the birthers....because she gave you the information from the foreign donors that give her money to help children and fight disease.

I challenge you to give me a similar list of foreign donors that spend money at Trump's for profit international businesses (which does not help children or fight disease but rather adds to Donald Trump's personal bottom line).

And if you cant (you cant) then it would seem the argument is settled. But if it makes you feel better to cry about Hilary's non-indictment from the softball Congressional investigation led by liberal Trey Gowdy then so be it. Whatever makes you feel better.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
It came from your post: "The federal government confirmed to news.com.au it has not renewed any of its partnerships with the scandal-plagued Clinton Foundation"

Although DonDiego and his source failed to explain what the big scandal is. I guess the reader is just supposed to presume one exists - sorta like BENGAZHI !
Holy-Moly !

It's the Australians who recognized the scandal-plagued organization ! So far as DonDiego recalls the Australians have never lied to him before; . . . maybe it's true.

DonDiego sure hopes those benevolent Saudi Arabians continue contributing to the Clinton Foundation's charitable works.
You've been lied to plenty of times by Rupert Murdoch enterprises, DonDIego. Remember when you used the NY POst to show us how Obama fudged the unemployment numbers? Now you've had to go across the Pacific to find a NewsCorp media source that provides about as much insight. In any event - DonDiego can breathe a huge sigh of relief. Hillary's undefined scandal will not be an issue for the American public as she will not president. But for some reason DonDIego is much more obsessed with her "issues" than the person he voted for. I'm not at all shocked.

Regarding Saudi Arabia's contributions - I guess we wont know how much they spend at Trump's resort in Dubai because The Donald doesn't say. Nobody but the "corrupt media" cares about his conflicts of interests says the president-elect. And you can bet that is a true statement in DOnDIego's case - and Murdoch's non-corrupt media empire too!


Did Hillary lie to PJ regarding emails?


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
I provide facts with links and Boiler provides unfounded conspiracy. Par for the course.

Boilerman is already mum about Trump's for-profit enterprise sitting footsteps away from the White House with no obligation to disclose its financials. And we can expect it to stay that way.


Boiler, you lied about Hillary's emails. Remember?
PJ has his crystal ball and pointed hat on evidently......Clearly, I would never vote for Liarry or Obamanation. So HE decides I must have voted for Trump. PJ once again assumes facts NOT in evidence. Nice try comrade.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
The Clinton Foundation discloses all of it's finances? How funny.



And true!
Clinton FOundation donor information website

Lets be honest, Boiler. Despite all of your empty "Hillary is a crook" rhetoric - the fact is she is exponentially more transparent and ethical than the sexual predator/business fraudster you just voted for.

And we are going to see over the next 4 years that just like DonDiego - your intolerance for dishonesty...and non-transparency....and conflicts of interest....and pay-for-play politics is limited to the baseless conspiracies you made up about Hillary Clinton for political reasons.

In reality scumbags in Washington don't bother you much so long as they have an "R" by their name.


While it may be true they do disclose the foundations finances, some may disagree to the accuracy and validity of it, namely the FBI and possibly the IRS as well. They're not squeaky clean just 'cause they put out some information.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now