Under the rules one can sign up for the exchange as one is in the ambulance on the way to the hospital, so one can pay the penalty and only get the inurance when one has medical bills - another sure financial loser for the exchanges.
QuoteSo you are saying saying the CBO forecast is bad because some future Congress and president may decide to modify it. Seriously?
Originally posted by: DonDiegoQuoteNot at all, . . . DonDiego posts links so that interested people can learn something.
Originally posted by: forkushV
DonDiego, dontcha hate it when people actually click on your links? From your source:
"The CBO did an admirable job of projecting the cost of this legislation as written."
You could have saved yourself a lot of typing by just saying that forky is telling the truth and that hoops is...fantasizing.
Unfortunately some folks just skim through things to come up with something to reinforce their own propaganda. F'rinstance, forkushV does not quote the entire paragraph:
"When Congress inevitably fails to implement the Obama plan’s spending cuts, and expands its subsidies to more and more people, the cost of this legislation will grow beyond $3 trillion. The CBO did an admirable job of projecting the cost of this legislation as written. But the text of the legislation does not reflect the reality it would create."...
QuoteItem 1 - The Penalty Tax
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Don Diego has already been pointed to the math. Alas he didn't like the source. The CBO is not credible at measuring the financial ramifications of legislation in his eyes. But they concluded the net result is deficit reducing. Don Diego then defferred us to a report that scored a fictional health care system that is not law in any part of the known universe.
Don Diego writes:
"DonDiego supposes the cash resource generated by the $95 penalty-tax would be exhausted well before the last broken arm is set. "
So its up to our gentle readers to see decide has more insight into the math of the bill. People who sat down and scored the figures...or someone who is casually "suppossing" in this forum.
In either case we will know for certain what the math is when the law is fully implemented.
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
So, since pjstroh referenced the math at least tell poor old DonDiego where he found out that the $95 penalty-tax is supposed to cover emergency medical care for the uninsured. Whether there's math there or not.
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme
Bull! You and others have become so accustomed to insurance that you apparently have no idea that some people pay for their medical expenses out of their own pockets. I have for years. Up to and including surgery. It costs less than insurance! I have found a number of doctors who charge discounted rates when the patient is paying cash. They don't have to pay a staff member to process the insurance paperwork and they don't have to wait to be paid.
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
We know the math from the system Don Diego says we are better off with - life before Obamacare. In that system the uninsured PAID NOTHING into the system. In Obamacare they pay something. If Don Diego is concerned that the "something" isn't going to be enough to cover all the costs then perhaps ...just perhaps...it is a thoughtful concern. But then why on earth would he then advocate we have the uninsured pay nothing?
Don Diego wanted math. Here is some in its most basic form: "Something" is greater than "nothing".