House panel opposes giving SEC documents for insider trading probe

What a crock! Why am I not surprised, congressmen feel they're above the law.

https://news.yahoo.com/house-panel-opposes-giving-sec-documents-insider-trading-210745911--sector.html

A U.S. House of Representatives panel said on Friday it should not have to comply with a federal regulator's demand for documents sought for an insider-trading probe involving the staff director of a subcommittee and a lobbyist...

..The committee's filing called the SEC subpoena "a remarkable fishing expedition for congressional records." It said the U.S. Constitution shields the panel and Sutter from being compelled to testify or produce documents..

.. In previous court filings, the SEC said Hayes spoke with Sutter the same day that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced reimbursement rates for the Medicare Advantage program.

The regulator said Hayes then emailed the brokerage firm Height Securities, which shortly afterward sent its clients a "flash alert" suggesting the deal could help insurance companies such as Humana Inc and Health Net Inc .

Share prices of both companies jumped after the report was issued.

How in the hell do they figure the constitution protects them from insider trading?
If the accusation is correct, I hope that the judge forces asks them to turn over the emails. Also, I hope to learn who on the committee argues against the turnover of records.




Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
What a crock! Why am I not surprised, congressmen feel they're above the law.

https://news.yahoo.com/house-panel-opposes-giving-sec-documents-insider-trading-210745911--sector.htmlthe
A U.S. House of Representatives panel said on Friday it should not have to comply with a federal regulator's demand for documents sought for an insider-trading probe involving the staff director of a subcommittee and a lobbyist...

..The committee's filing called the SEC subpoena "a remarkable fishing expedition for congressional records." It said the U.S. Constitution shields the panel and Sutter from being compelled to testify or produce documents..

.. In previous court filings, the SEC said Hayes spoke with Sutter the same day that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced reimbursement rates for the Medicare Advantage program.

The regulator said Hayes then emailed the brokerage firm Height Securities, which shortly afterward sent its clients a "flash alert" suggesting the deal could help insurance companies such as Humana Inc and Health Net Inc .

Share prices of both companies jumped after the report was issued.

How in the hell do they figure the constitution protects them from insider trading?


It's amazing the way politicians have elevated themselves up to god like status,thinking they don't have to answer to anyone.
I'm really surprised there's not more comments on this.I really hope it's not because it doesn't say it was dem or rep were specifically mentioned so there can be no finger pointing and bitching it. It shouldn't matter a rats ass if it was dem or rep ,it's a clear case of trying to skirt the law and rise above it no matte the affiliation.

It was legal for Congress to engage in insider trading until a few years ago. Some of them obviously have not learned. I like the new law and am glad it is being enforced. And i support any violator of any party get appropriate discipline if caught breaking it
Time for broken hard drives and lost emails.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now