How 'bout Them Charlotte Riots

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
It isn't reasonable for the cops to confront people without probable cause. A black man holding (brandishing!!!) a gun in an open-carry state is not probable cause. A young black man walking down the street is not probable cause for a stop-and-frisk. And setting up DUI checkpoints in black areas when nearby white areas have higher incidences of actual DUI's is common and disgraceful. The BLM movement isn't hallucinating this shit, and cops who engage in the above should be fired and prosecuted, because they are judging people by the color of their skin and not the content their character.

Just like you.

DonDiego requests a citation of an instance in which he judged anyone by the color of his skin.

[n.b. DonDiego has asked forkushV to cite earlier instances of DonDiego's alleged prejudice, . . . and no such citation has made it to these pages. So he does not expect forkushV to provide evidence of poor old DonDiego's bad judgement in this instance, . . . but it doesn't hurt to ask.
Forkie's suggested policy will assure that the good people in the tough black neighborhoods will continue dying at a far higher rate than need be. Forkie's policy kills, and somehow he holds his head high.


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
You [DonDiego] wrote "it is reasonable that the police confront Blacks disproportionately to their portion of the population."

Confront disproportionately in stop-and-frisks and DUI checkpoints without probable cause? That's racial profiling. It's judging people by the color of their skin instead of the content of the content of their character, and the BLM people aren't hallucinating this shit.

Umm, what poor old DonDiego actually wrote:
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
As has been noted elsewhere the Black community has a higher crime rate than the White community. Thus it is reasonable that the police confront Blacks disproportionately to their portion of the population...

It isn't reasonable for the cops to confront people without probable cause. A black man holding (brandishing!!!) a gun in an open-carry state is not probable cause. A young black man walking down the street is not probable cause for a stop-and-frisk. And setting up DUI checkpoints in black areas when nearby white areas have higher incidences of actual DUI's is common and disgraceful. The BLM movement isn't hallucinating this shit, and cops who engage in the above should be fired and prosecuted, because they are judging people by the color of their skin and not the content their character.

Just like you.


Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
It isn't reasonable for the cops to confront people without probable cause. A black man holding (brandishing!!!) a gun in an open-carry state is not probable cause. A young black man walking down the street is not probable cause for a stop-and-frisk. And setting up DUI checkpoints in black areas when nearby white areas have higher incidences of actual DUI's is common and disgraceful. The BLM movement isn't hallucinating this shit, and cops who engage in the above should be fired and prosecuted, because they are judging people by the color of their skin and not the content their character.

Just like you.

DonDiego requests a citation of an instance in which he judged anyone by the color of his skin...
I already provided the applicable quote. You justify the police choosing to confront blacks based on crime statistics.

And let's face it DonDiego, when a black person is caught littering you're right there to start a thread. We know what you are.
Yet the policies that Forkie subscribes to kills lots of black folks. And this heartless soul calls others racist.


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
It isn't reasonable for the cops to confront people without probable cause. A black man holding (brandishing!!!) a gun in an open-carry state is not probable cause. A young black man walking down the street is not probable cause for a stop-and-frisk. And setting up DUI checkpoints in black areas when nearby white areas have higher incidences of actual DUI's is common and disgraceful. The BLM movement isn't hallucinating this shit, and cops who engage in the above should be fired and prosecuted, because they are judging people by the color of their skin and not the content their character.

Just like you.

DonDiego requests a citation of an instance in which he judged anyone by the color of his skin...
I already provided the applicable quote. You justify the police choosing to confront blacks based on crime statistics.

And let's face it DonDiego, when a black person is caught littering you're right there to start a thread. We know what you are.



"You justify the police choosing to confront blacks based on crime statistics"

Sounds logical to me

I worked a football game where a minority team from NJ came to the Bronx to play a minority team. After the game the NJ team found the tires to their cars slashed
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
DonDiego requests a citation of an instance in which he judged anyone by the color of his skin...
I already provided the applicable quote. You justify the police choosing to confront blacks based on crime statistics.

And let's face it DonDiego, when a black person is caught littering you're right there to start a thread. We know what you are.
i. No, the quote does no such thing.

ii.DonDiego did not justify the police choosing to confront Blacks. What he did do was provide statistics addressing the fact that in the United States the Black population exhibits a higher crime rate than others. Therefore, it is inevitable that in the performance of their duties police will confront Blacks disproportionately more often than their population would indicate.

iii. DonDiego has never started a thread addressing the littering tendencies of Black persons; he was unaware of it until forkushV mentioned it.

iv. Who is this "we" to whom forkushV refers? It sure sounds awfully intimidating.


"We" that's the left that has the one and only correct answer/approach to any/all problems with this country. If you don't agree with them the name calling starts: racist, misogynist, xenophobe, fascist, Nazi, etc. etc. etc.
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
iv. Who is this "we" to whom forkushV refers? It sure sounds awfully intimidating.



Hey forkie, care to comment on Scott's criminal record? A good reason in my view to delay judgement until facts come to light.


Take a look at the latest incident.

EL CAJON, Calif. (AP) — A black man reportedly acting erratically at a strip mall in suburban San Diego was shot and killed by police after pulling an object from his pocket, pointing it at officers and assuming a "shooting stance," authorities said.

One of the officers tried and failed to subdue the unidentified man with a stun gun before the other officer fired several times, El Cajon Police Chief Jeff Davis said at a late night news conference.


You are one of the responding officers and are dealing with a non cooperative man who appears to be mental. He reaches in his pocket and produces an object and takes a shooting stance at you. Do you wait to see if it is a real gun and he shoots it or do you shoot? There are always two sides to these stories and much of the press is stirring the shit without giving all of the facts of the event.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now