How 'bout Them Charlotte Riots

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
DonDiego requests a citation of an instance in which he judged anyone by the color of his skin...
I already provided the applicable quote. You justify the police choosing to confront blacks based on crime statistics.

And let's face it DonDiego, when a black person is caught littering you're right there to start a thread. We know what you are.
i. No, the quote does no such thing.

ii.DonDiego did not justify the police choosing to confront Blacks. What he did do was provide statistics addressing the fact that in the United States the Black population exhibits a higher crime rate than others. Therefore, it is inevitable that in the performance of their duties police will confront Blacks disproportionately more often than their population would indicate...

Really? Color me skeptical, but at the very least your advocacy that the police confront blacks diproportionately was seriously piss-poor language. Because African-Americans are confronted every time they are stopped for DWB (Driving While Black). Same thing when they are stopped and frisked and confroned disproportionately to the likelihood they are carrying weapons. How about the police confronting a black man for openly carrying a gun in an open carry state? Same with DUI checkpoints in black neighborhoods, when white neighborhoods with higher DUI rates are not targeted. And so on.

Maybe DonDiego should join Black Lives Matters in condemning the above. Or maybe he prefers it as a way to keep them in their place.
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
...Who is this "we" to whom forkushV refers? It sure sounds awfully intimidating.
WE consists of those of us who remember DonDiego's linkage to such gems as "Obama is from Kenya," "Naked Crucifixions In Front of the Egyptian Presidential Palace," and links to just about any story where an African-American did anything more serious than failed to cover their mouth when coughing.

Yes DonDiego, WE know what you are.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
. . . Color me skeptical, but at the very least your advocacy that the police confront blacks disproportionately was seriously piss-poor language. Because African-Americans are confronted every time they are stopped for DWB (Driving While Black). Same thing when they are stopped and frisked and confroned disproportionately to the likelihood they are carrying weapons. How about the police confronting a black man for openly carrying a gun in an open carry state? Same with DUI checkpoints in black neighborhoods, when white neighborhoods with higher DUI rates are not targeted. And so on.

Maybe DonDiego should join Black Lives Matters in condemning the above. Or maybe he prefers it as a way to keep them in their place.

i. DonDiego has not "advocated" that police confront Black people disproportionately. He has "recognized" that they are likely to encounter Black people disproportionately, because they are involved in criminal activities disproportionately. PERIOD.
DonDiego requests, again, forkushV cite an instance where DonDiego has advocated for police confrontations with anyone. [So far DonDiego's earlier similar requests have resulted in no legitimate response from forkushV; poor old DonDiego lives on hope.]

i.a. DonDiego has not commented on police stopping anyone driving.
i.b. DonDiego has not commented on police stopping/frisking anyone.
i.c. DonDiego has not commented on police confronting anyone open-carrying in an open-carry State.
i.d. DonDiego has not commented on any police DUI checkpoint policies.

forkushV seems awfully upset with poor old DonDiego for things which poor old DonDiego has never said or done or things about which poor old DonDiego has not expressed an opinion.
Perhaps forkushV should seek professional help; the internets is unlikely to help his condition.

ii. DonDiego has no plans to join Black Lives Matter. DonDiego believes all lives matter equally; Black Lives Matter objects to that belief.
Forky, I believe every single person on this board sees straight through the dishonest spin bullshit you're attempting to pull, the thing is, the only one buying it is you. I'm pretty certain there's no "we" that you speak of unless you're hearing voices telling you so. It really starts to become embarrassing when you keep pressing your non-existent points like this, but by all means, press on.

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Forky, I believe every single person on this board sees straight through the dishonest spin bullshit you're attempting to pull, the thing is, the only one buying it is you. I'm pretty certain there's no "we" that you speak of unless you're hearing voices telling you so.
Dude, you don't remember DonDiego's "Naked Crucifixions In Front Of The Egyptian Presidential Palace?" I thought it was memorable.
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
forkushV seems awfully upset with poor old DonDiego for things which poor old DonDiego has never said or done or things about which poor old DonDiego has not expressed an opinion.

It's his way.

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
. . . Color me skeptical, but at the very least your advocacy that the police confront blacks disproportionately was seriously piss-poor language. Because African-Americans are confronted every time they are stopped for DWB (Driving While Black). Same thing when they are stopped and frisked and confroned disproportionately to the likelihood they are carrying weapons. How about the police confronting a black man for openly carrying a gun in an open carry state? Same with DUI checkpoints in black neighborhoods, when white neighborhoods with higher DUI rates are not targeted. And so on.

Maybe DonDiego should join Black Lives Matters in condemning the above. Or maybe he prefers it as a way to keep them in their place.

i. DonDiego has not "advocated" that police confront Black people disproportionately. He has "recognized" that they are likely to encounter Black people disproportionately, because they are involved in criminal activities disproportionately. PERIOD.
DonDiego requests, again, forkushV cite an instance where DonDiego has advocated for police confrontations with anyone. [So far DonDiego's earlier similar requests have resulted in no legitimate response from forkushV; poor old DonDiego lives on hope.]

i.a. DonDiego has not commented on police stopping anyone driving.
i.b. DonDiego has not commented on police stopping/frisking anyone.
i.c. DonDiego has not commented on police confronting anyone open-carrying in an open-carry State.
i.d. DonDiego has not commented on any police DUI checkpoint policies...
So in spite of appearances, you're real response to the above is "no comment." Wow, you're a real profile in courage!
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
. . . Color me skeptical, but at the very least your advocacy that the police confront blacks disproportionately was seriously piss-poor language. Because African-Americans are confronted every time they are stopped for DWB (Driving While Black). Same thing when they are stopped and frisked and confroned disproportionately to the likelihood they are carrying weapons. How about the police confronting a black man for openly carrying a gun in an open carry state? Same with DUI checkpoints in black neighborhoods, when white neighborhoods with higher DUI rates are not targeted. And so on.

Maybe DonDiego should join Black Lives Matters in condemning the above. Or maybe he prefers it as a way to keep them in their place.

i. DonDiego has not "advocated" that police confront Black people disproportionately. He has "recognized" that they are likely to encounter Black people disproportionately, because they are involved in criminal activities disproportionately. PERIOD.
DonDiego requests, again, forkushV cite an instance where DonDiego has advocated for police confrontations with anyone. [So far DonDiego's earlier similar requests have resulted in no legitimate response from forkushV; poor old DonDiego lives on hope.]

i.a. DonDiego has not commented on police stopping anyone driving.
i.b. DonDiego has not commented on police stopping/frisking anyone.
i.c. DonDiego has not commented on police confronting anyone open-carrying in an open-carry State.
i.d. DonDiego has not commented on any police DUI checkpoint policies...
So in spite of appearances, you're real response to the above is "no comment." Wow, you're a real profile in courage!
He's just correcting your baseless, hateful accusations. It's what any target of a smear would do. Your reaction is "So you didn't say any of the racist things I just accused you of? Well unless you disavow these ideas I've already falsely accused you of harboring, you're a coward too". Just like the witch hunts. We all think you owe DonDiego an apology for maliciously and falsely accusing him of racism.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
. . . Color me skeptical, but at the very least your advocacy that the police confront blacks disproportionately was seriously piss-poor language. Because African-Americans are confronted every time they are stopped for DWB (Driving While Black). Same thing when they are stopped and frisked and confroned disproportionately to the likelihood they are carrying weapons. How about the police confronting a black man for openly carrying a gun in an open carry state? Same with DUI checkpoints in black neighborhoods, when white neighborhoods with higher DUI rates are not targeted. And so on.

Maybe DonDiego should join Black Lives Matters in condemning the above. Or maybe he prefers it as a way to keep them in their place.

i. DonDiego has not "advocated" that police confront Black people disproportionately. He has "recognized" that they are likely to encounter Black people disproportionately, because they are involved in criminal activities disproportionately. PERIOD.
DonDiego requests, again, forkushV cite an instance where DonDiego has advocated for police confrontations with anyone. [So far DonDiego's earlier similar requests have resulted in no legitimate response from forkushV; poor old DonDiego lives on hope.]

i.a. DonDiego has not commented on police stopping anyone driving.
i.b. DonDiego has not commented on police stopping/frisking anyone.
i.c. DonDiego has not commented on police confronting anyone open-carrying in an open-carry State.
i.d. DonDiego has not commented on any police DUI checkpoint policies...
So in spite of appearances, you're real response to the above is "no comment." Wow, you're a real profile in courage!

So, DonDiego requests that forkushV support his claim that DonDiego has "advocated for police confrontation with anyone."
And, just as on numerous earlier occasions, . . . and just as DonDiego predicted, . . . once again forkushV cannot provide any evidence to support his charge against poor old DonDiego.
And so forkushV resorts to besmirching poor old DonDiego's character, . . . again.

Pretty soon poor old DonDiego is going to think that forkushV doesn't like him.
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
We all think you owe DonDiego an apology for maliciously and falsely accusing him of racism.

Who is this "We" to which alanleroyII refers ?

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now