How I feel about Mr. Trump

Exactly. That kind of goes back to the point someone else was making about Obama's overall approval rating verses his approval rating on actual issues. He's decent looking and well-spoken, photogenic and charming and all that. Trump is little to none of that, and frankly neither was Hillary. Kind of makes you wonder if Hillary hadn't been old and shrill if she could have won. There's enough people out there who care more about what the commander in chief looks and sounds like, than what he actually does.




Quote

Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
Would @aferrelli prefer a president who looks and sounds good, but molds policy which leads to a crappy economy, or does he want a president who doesn't look and sound so good, but who gets the economy cranking?

Hint: words and looks don't put food on the table.


Quote

Originally posted by: aferrelli
Obama is more intelligent and classy than Trump will ever be. Obama is thoughtful, and measured. Obama is a uniter, and always remained positive about the outlook for our country. Trump doesn't have any of Obama's good qualities.



Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: lvfritz
The only person who should be completely happy wit the Obamanation Presidency is Jimmy Carter. The next generation will no longer look at him for being the worst President in their lifetime.

Today, another chance for Obamanation to help the nation come together......and he is like a kid (how appropriate!) that can't hit the pinata. What an incredible waste.


Obama is leaving office with one of the highest approval ratings in the last 100 years. It would seem the only people who think he did a lousy job are the same nimrods who made up stories about him fudging the unemployment numbers.

Enter LVA right-wing crybabies.


I believe his high approval ratings come largely because he's an extremely charismatic speaker and generally a pretty nice guy. Take a poll on healthcare, the economy etc. and it's not as high.
So what kind of poll do you need to take for trump to get similar ratings?
Hey billryan.....at the moment, Trump is decidedly polling lower than Obamanation and he likely will for a year or more. Neither of us know these guys personally, but Obamanation's public persona is much more clear than Trump's. The only poll that matters happened two months ago. And the polls before the election were less than correct.

My guess? Trump will be wildly unpopular until he actually accomplishes something. Unlike Obamanation who is wildly popular without accomplishing anything.

Time will tell. Trump will have to fight off the Dems, the press and the Republicans as well. Imagine the fights that will happen if tries to downsize this out of control government! All sides will fight for the status quo.

An election.


Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
So what kind of poll do you need to take for trump to get similar ratings?


I'm not interested in getting into ugly politics and really who cares about my opinion, But I will offer to clarify a few things about polling after reading a lot of misinformation on these boards and elsewhere.

I commission two surveys a year and they predict results to the percentage point. I have a lot of faith in surveys and research if it is done right. I have presented a couple of times nationally on the value of surveys and research for businesses and organizations as well.

With the latest Presidential election, which shocked many people, the surprise came not so much because of the polling data but instead because of the way the polling data was interpreted by media, pundits, politicians, etc. By and large the election results came in within the margin of error. Clinton was expected to win the popular vote by close to 4 million, but she only won by about 3 million. The Trump victories in some of these states that tipped the electoral college came within the margin of error. The issue is that polling data demonstrated that the electoral college outcome was very much up in the air ahead of election day. But reporting had Clinton up by X points, depending on the day, which is somewhat meaningless.

Regarding Trump's 40% approval rating this is reflective of all Americans and not registered voters. So it's not necessarily indicative of the outcome of an election if it were held today between Clinton and Trump. ... To that point, young people and minorities have a much lower voter turnout. ... Some believed that Arizona, a longstanding, dependable Red state, would be in play for Clinton last year due to Trump's comments about Hispanics and Mexicans and our state's substantial Hispanic population. I was skeptical and sure enough statistically it proved true again. While 32% of Arizonans are Hispanic, they only represented 13% of the vote. ... Likewise, 18 to 24 voter turnout of all races is abyssmal, 25 to 34 isn't much better. ... Voters over age 65 turn out at a disproportionate rate. 55 to 64 also has very high voter turnout.

I bring up the age and voter turnout issue because it will likely impact other social races down the line, such as gay marriage or recreational marijuana usage. ... There is a Mason Dixon line on these issues, I don't know what they are off the top of my head, but a majority of people under, let's say, 53 years of age, support gay marriage and a majority of people over 53 are opposed to gay marriage. So as older voters eventually disappear and the trend continues down, these may be easy victories for these causes some day.

Just some things to gnaw on.
Quote

Originally posted by: Chessie
I am ashamed and embarrased that this man will represent this great country.

The world will now wonder "we thought the US was great.

No more looking up to our president.

Do I get an "amen"


No amen from me. I wait to see how things go.

I will be hopeful and perhaps more proactive in contacting my congressmen with issues. That is an important thing to do, and it can make a difference. It takes them hearing from more than one constituent, but I'll do my part.

A speech is only a speech, but I was encouraged by Mr. Trump's inaugural. He is his own man, at least right now

While he mentioned issues that made the ex-POTUS's squirm, he did not mention the ACA. That impressed me, that he didn't bring that up. I think he knew better.

Hyperbole? Yes, IMO, when after each 'problem' he said "This stops today, right now."
Probably why he didn't bring up the ACA

That was a worry for me pre-election--too prone to hyperbole for my comfort, in a loose cannon sort of way.

I am glad to be rid of the Clinton dynasty, at least for the moment. Obama got his eight years in, and some good things occurred, whether or not he can take credit.

Hopefully you and others will utilize effective means of getting your concerns up to Capitol Hill. Government is so very complex, it takes research and sincere advocacy efforts to be 'heard' but that is everyone's right and responsibility, not just complaining to one another.
Quote

Originally posted by: friedmush
I'm not interested in getting into ugly politics and really who cares about my opinion, But I will offer to clarify a few things about polling after reading a lot of misinformation on these boards and elsewhere.

I commission two surveys a year and they predict results to the percentage point. I have a lot of faith in surveys and research if it is done right. I have presented a couple of times nationally on the value of surveys and research for businesses and organizations as well.

With the latest Presidential election, which shocked many people, the surprise came not so much because of the polling data but instead because of the way the polling data was interpreted by media, pundits, politicians, etc. By and large the election results came in within the margin of error. Clinton was expected to win the popular vote by close to 4 million, but she only won by about 3 million. The Trump victories in some of these states that tipped the electoral college came within the margin of error. The issue is that polling data demonstrated that the electoral college outcome was very much up in the air ahead of election day. But reporting had Clinton up by X points, depending on the day, which is somewhat meaningless.

Regarding Trump's 40% approval rating this is reflective of all Americans and not registered voters. So it's not necessarily indicative of the outcome of an election if it were held today between Clinton and Trump. ... To that point, young people and minorities have a much lower voter turnout. ... Some believed that Arizona, a longstanding, dependable Red state, would be in play for Clinton last year due to Trump's comments about Hispanics and Mexicans and our state's substantial Hispanic population. I was skeptical and sure enough statistically it proved true again. While 32% of Arizonans are Hispanic, they only represented 13% of the vote. ... Likewise, 18 to 24 voter turnout of all races is abyssmal, 25 to 34 isn't much better. ... Voters over age 65 turn out at a disproportionate rate. 55 to 64 also has very high voter turnout.

I bring up the age and voter turnout issue because it will likely impact other social races down the line, such as gay marriage or recreational marijuana usage. ... There is a Mason Dixon line on these issues, I don't know what they are off the top of my head, but a majority of people under, let's say, 53 years of age, support gay marriage and a majority of people over 53 are opposed to gay marriage. So as older voters eventually disappear and the trend continues down, these may be easy victories for these causes some day.

Just some things to gnaw on.


Hiliary's 3 million votes came largely in the big states where after winning the state, any extra votes don't mean crap. However, Clinton's talk of accepting the election results were never followed by her own party which is hell bent on trying to invalidate the election results by any means necessary. (the russian hacking issue)

The next 2 years will tell the tale, although the Democrats are going to get a taste of their own medicine on that 60 vote shit...
Umm Chef, your reply has nothing to do with my post regarding misunderstanding of polling.

Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
Quote

Originally posted by: friedmush
I'm not interested in getting into ugly politics and really who cares about my opinion, But I will offer to clarify a few things about polling after reading a lot of misinformation on these boards and elsewhere.

I commission two surveys a year and they predict results to the percentage point. I have a lot of faith in surveys and research if it is done right. I have presented a couple of times nationally on the value of surveys and research for businesses and organizations as well.

With the latest Presidential election, which shocked many people, the surprise came not so much because of the polling data but instead because of the way the polling data was interpreted by media, pundits, politicians, etc. By and large the election results came in within the margin of error. Clinton was expected to win the popular vote by close to 4 million, but she only won by about 3 million. The Trump victories in some of these states that tipped the electoral college came within the margin of error. The issue is that polling data demonstrated that the electoral college outcome was very much up in the air ahead of election day. But reporting had Clinton up by X points, depending on the day, which is somewhat meaningless.

Regarding Trump's 40% approval rating this is reflective of all Americans and not registered voters. So it's not necessarily indicative of the outcome of an election if it were held today between Clinton and Trump. ... To that point, young people and minorities have a much lower voter turnout. ... Some believed that Arizona, a longstanding, dependable Red state, would be in play for Clinton last year due to Trump's comments about Hispanics and Mexicans and our state's substantial Hispanic population. I was skeptical and sure enough statistically it proved true again. While 32% of Arizonans are Hispanic, they only represented 13% of the vote. ... Likewise, 18 to 24 voter turnout of all races is abyssmal, 25 to 34 isn't much better. ... Voters over age 65 turn out at a disproportionate rate. 55 to 64 also has very high voter turnout.

I bring up the age and voter turnout issue because it will likely impact other social races down the line, such as gay marriage or recreational marijuana usage. ... There is a Mason Dixon line on these issues, I don't know what they are off the top of my head, but a majority of people under, let's say, 53 years of age, support gay marriage and a majority of people over 53 are opposed to gay marriage. So as older voters eventually disappear and the trend continues down, these may be easy victories for these causes some day.

Just some things to gnaw on.


Hiliary's 3 million votes came largely in the big states where after winning the state, any extra votes don't mean crap. However, Clinton's talk of accepting the election results were never followed by her own party which is hell bent on trying to invalidate the election results by any means necessary. (the russian hacking issue)

The next 2 years will tell the tale, although the Democrats are going to get a taste of their own medicine on that 60 vote shit...


Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
So what kind of poll do you need to take for trump to get similar ratings?


He won't get similar ratings, not even close. It's too early to tell what his poll numbers will be on actual policy,actions and results. Highly intelligent query there billy.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now