I am canceling the RS Evaluation

Quote

Originally posted by: RoadTrip
Any how, I do not think it was his intent to say "I am quitting this forum", and do not think any of you should interpret his comment, "Fair enough RT. We're done." which was directly addressed to me, to mean any such thing.


Even if he said "I am quitting this forum" there would be no reason to interpret it to mean that he is quitting the forum.
Quote

Originally posted by: KayPea
Quote

Originally posted by: RoadTrip
Any how, I do not think it was his intent to say "I am quitting this forum", and do not think any of you should interpret his comment, "Fair enough RT. We're done." which was directly addressed to me, to mean any such thing.


Even if he said "I am quitting this forum" there would be no reason to interpret it to mean that he is quitting the forum.


We've been over this already. Money quit the forum. He came back. Now, it's a new session. Sheesh.
Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
In a way you are correct: I don't know and so I ask. You on the other hand know everything. Wow you are a lucky man.

No you don't ask because you don't know what questions to ask. You don't understand the basics behind the game.

Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLABy the way Arc why did you criticize Melbedewey for his video production skills? Do you watch Melbedewey's videos often?

You must have missed his blurry video he linked where he was slurring his words in the background.

Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
It must be a wonderful thing knowing as much as you do without any need for seeking more information.

You really are the world's greatest authority.

Let's just say I understand the theory behind VP play. It may seem to you like I'm being arrogant but it's really not a difficult subject when you've put in enough work. You refuse to put in any effort whatsoever. Instead you'd rather make sarcastic statements. It just continues your ongoing problem of thinking you know more than you do.

Let me make a few things clear:

1. I don't want to hold the record for having the longest thread about me. I leave those titles to BAgiant and to Rob.

2. Arc I play the same strategies you play. I follow what I learned from Dancer and Grochowski. But I am open to Singer's methodology which is more than just optimal play as iit involves money and session management (my terms) and you're not. Now stop your BS about this ONLY being about the math. It isn't.

3. RT I will not continue the personal discussion. You don't like me and you don't have to. Lurker doesn't like me and he doesn't have to. Are we done?

4. I'll be back when Frank is back. We had a nice conversation today and tomorrow we are having lunch. Those of you critical of Frank are clueless about what went on so please stop it. As of now you lost him.



Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Arc: you think you know soooo much about Singer so answer this question. If you get the answer correct I will tell you. Get it wrong and I will give you the correct answer. Here's the question:

You are dealt a flush with four to the royal on 7/5 Bonus poker. How do you play the hand? Answer it according to how Singer would play it.

Show your knowledge Arc.


Why would you anyone care how Singer would play it? He would probably do something related to his win goal. What you should have asked in your interview is what Frank has mentioned many times. Why would reaching one win goal have any affect on his long term results? As long as a person continues to play, the decision on this hand would just average into their lifetime results.

If he chose to hold the flush he receives 25 credits vs. an average of 91-97 for holding the RF4 cards. Since this decision comes up about every 12-13 thousand hands, it is very likely to come up enough to reach fairly close to the ER. At 100 attempts it would be around 7,000 credits (which in your case is $35 grand). Pretty much a no-brainer.

Did you ask him why you should ever consider doing something that might cost you $35,000 over the next 5-10 years?
Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
2. Arc I play the same strategies you play. I follow what I learned from Dancer and Grochowski. But I am open to Singer's methodology which is more than just optimal play as iit involves money and session management (my terms) and you're not. Now stop your BS about this ONLY being about the math. It isn't.


Once again you demonstrate your confusion. As has been stated endlessly, nobody has anything against setting win goals, etc (even if they don't really mean much). It all gets down to Singer's false claims. When are you going to address the real issues instead of always trying to avoid them?

The only issues are with Singer's false claims. The other stuff is just thrown in there to confuse you (and oh how it has worked). You are the only one spouting BS.

Quote

In all fairness to MoneyLA and his response to my previous message ..... "Fair enough RT. We're done."

That is not what he is saying in that specific message for those of you who may misconstrue his intentions. Sorry, but that response was an indication, and the way I've interpreted it, is that he is "done" with any discussion relating to the specific messages he & I bantered forth and back in this thread, and perhaps others, regarding an unrelated to this thread topic / subject.

I believe it does mean that he will no longer discuss that specific topic with me.

It may mean he has hastily decided to "Ignore" my messages, although that action would be small, petty kinderground behavior.

Any how, I do not think it was his intent to say "I am quitting this forum", and do not think any of you should interpret his comment, "Fair enough RT. We're done." which was directly addressed to me, to mean any such thing.



I know he didn't mean to say that but a man can have his wishes right ?
Ok Arc: what false claims? Maybe this might settle the dispute here.
Money.....

I do not understand, or know why you can unequivocally say "You don't like me and you don't have to." It is just wrong for anyone to speak for me about what I think. I'm perfectly capable of doing that myself, if I choose to.

While it is very true that, "I do not have to", I have no valid reason to not try, and I have never made the statement , "I do not like you" online and directed toward any individual. Yet. it is always possible that day will come.

I have made statements regarding things you have said, or the way you've said things, because I expect more, a higher standard so to speak, from someone with your background, training, and education than I have any right to expect from others posting on an anonymous internet forum who are not "known" as "real people". You are not "anonymous".

I do not respect things you've written online that I know to be inconsistant, deceitful, inappropriate.

But not respecting something written does not equate to "not like".

I try to "like" everyone. I choose to find good in people.

It's your choice whether to like or not like someone.

Personally, I have a long list of people I just don't like. People like Hitler. Manson. Pedophiles. Perverts. Many, many more.

Than I have a list of people I do not dislike, although I may choose not cross a room to introduce myself and shake their hand.

Actually, believe it or not, you are NOT on either list.

Please, do not speak for me. If you want people to know what I think or believe, than please ask me to respond.














Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Ok Arc: what false claims? Maybe this might settle the dispute here.

What's quite humorous is I have spelled these out multiple times, both here and on Money's own forum. Really shows how he ignores what he doesn't want to hear.

Go back and READ. It's all there.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now