Quote
Originally posted by: arshaleign
There is NO real debate because virtually all VP strategy are near identical. Bob Dancer and Dan Paymar - who don't like each other very much - have almost identical stratgies. And their strategies are just about the same as those of the Wizard of Odds (Michael Shackleford) and Wolf Software and WinPoker and Jean Scott and Frank Kneeland. Any differences all of the above have are on minor issues such as the value of penalty cards.
There is one notable exception, Mr. Singer, and he stands out because he is a charlatan who tells some people what they really want to hear. .
Appreciate your viewpoint.
Originally posted by: arshaleign
There is NO real debate because virtually all VP strategy are near identical. Bob Dancer and Dan Paymar - who don't like each other very much - have almost identical stratgies. And their strategies are just about the same as those of the Wizard of Odds (Michael Shackleford) and Wolf Software and WinPoker and Jean Scott and Frank Kneeland. Any differences all of the above have are on minor issues such as the value of penalty cards.
There is one notable exception, Mr. Singer, and he stands out because he is a charlatan who tells some people what they really want to hear. .
Appreciate your viewpoint.
Quote
Originally posted by: arshaleign
And by the way, paytables matter. Playing dollar 8/5 Jacks or Better instead of 9/6 at 600 hands per hour will cost a player on average about $70. Not a smart move, but then again, advantage players are very grateful to people like you. Without you, the jucier pay tables, plus the cash back, mailers, and drawings, would cease to exist.
I understand why pay tables matter and never said I didn't.
I was illustrating a point by saying "Some will only play 9/6 JOB. Others will play whatever machine speaks to them. Some care about pay tables while others could give a flying flip. "
