Quote
Originally posted by: jatki99
I'm still laughing at Soldier of fortune.
Originally posted by: jatki99
I'm still laughing at Soldier of fortune.
Yea SoF IS the premier source of right wing news for the Mercs of the world.
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteYes Spiro.
Originally posted by: hoops2
"Since the conservative media is so large"
What?
Fox News functions as an arm of the Republican Party. There is no equivalent for the Democrats.
QuoteWow, it's hard to pack that much stupid into just three sentences.
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteYes Spiro.
Originally posted by: hoops2
"Since the conservative media is so large"
What?
Fox News functions as an arm of the Republican Party. There is no equivalent for the Democrats.
Forkie, you been smoking crack?
Btw, you keep mentioning the Koch brothers, what about some ass named Soros?
He is the billionaire donating to all things democratic.
Quote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteWow, it's hard to pack that much stupid into just three sentences.
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteYes Spiro.
Originally posted by: hoops2
"Since the conservative media is so large"
What?
Fox News functions as an arm of the Republican Party. There is no equivalent for the Democrats.
Forkie, you been smoking crack?
Btw, you keep mentioning the Koch brothers, what about some ass named Soros?
He is the billionaire donating to all things democratic.
1. No, I don't keep mentioning the Koch brothers.
2. No, Soros' money and influence doesn't compare with that of the Koch's. chef, if this isn't one of your typical hit-and-run comments, and you want to compare evidence, I will kick your ass around the block on this one.
3. All you guys got showing that we have a librul media is that Spiro and Dick said so. Oh, and the guy here even dumber than you said I should google it.

QuoteYou mean this ISN'T one of your typical chickenshit hit-and-run posts where you make a claim and then never back it up?
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteWow, it's hard to pack that much stupid into just three sentences.
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteYes Spiro.
Originally posted by: hoops2
"Since the conservative media is so large"
What?
Fox News functions as an arm of the Republican Party. There is no equivalent for the Democrats.
Forkie, you been smoking crack?
Btw, you keep mentioning the Koch brothers, what about some ass named Soros?
He is the billionaire donating to all things democratic.
1. No, I don't keep mentioning the Koch brothers.
2. No, Soros' money and influence doesn't compare with that of the Koch's. chef, if this isn't one of your typical hit-and-run comments, and you want to compare evidence, I will kick your ass around the block on this one.
3. All you guys got showing that we have a librul media is that Spiro and Dick said so. Oh, and the guy here even dumber than you said I should google it.
1. yes you do.
2. Considering the fact that 2 brothers are doing the donating, the $30 mil difference isn't much at all. (remember to count all of the 527's that George and his minions are running)

Quote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteYou mean this ISN'T one of your typical chickenshit hit-and-run posts where you make a claim and then never back it up?
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteWow, it's hard to pack that much stupid into just three sentences.
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteYes Spiro.
Originally posted by: hoops2
"Since the conservative media is so large"
What?
Fox News functions as an arm of the Republican Party. There is no equivalent for the Democrats.
Forkie, you been smoking crack?
Btw, you keep mentioning the Koch brothers, what about some ass named Soros?
He is the billionaire donating to all things democratic.
1. No, I don't keep mentioning the Koch brothers.
2. No, Soros' money and influence doesn't compare with that of the Koch's. chef, if this isn't one of your typical hit-and-run comments, and you want to compare evidence, I will kick your ass around the block on this one.
3. All you guys got showing that we have a librul media is that Spiro and Dick said so. Oh, and the guy here even dumber than you said I should google it.
1. yes you do.
2. Considering the fact that 2 brothers are doing the donating, the $30 mil difference isn't much at all. (remember to count all of the 527's that George and his minions are running)
Okay then:
QuoteMost presidential campaign money is spent NOT by the individual campaigns but by PACs - like Koch and Rove - and by the national parties (see below). If you don't know that very basic fact, maybe you should just stay in the shallow end.
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteYou mean this ISN'T one of your typical chickenshit hit-and-run posts where you make a claim and then never back it up?
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteWow, it's hard to pack that much stupid into just three sentences.
Originally posted by: chefantwonQuote
Originally posted by: forkushVQuoteYes Spiro.
Originally posted by: hoops2
"Since the conservative media is so large"
What?
Fox News functions as an arm of the Republican Party. There is no equivalent for the Democrats.
Forkie, you been smoking crack?
Btw, you keep mentioning the Koch brothers, what about some ass named Soros?
He is the billionaire donating to all things democratic.
1. No, I don't keep mentioning the Koch brothers.
2. No, Soros' money and influence doesn't compare with that of the Koch's. chef, if this isn't one of your typical hit-and-run comments, and you want to compare evidence, I will kick your ass around the block on this one.
3. All you guys got showing that we have a librul media is that Spiro and Dick said so. Oh, and the guy here even dumber than you said I should google it.
1. yes you do.
2. Considering the fact that 2 brothers are doing the donating, the $30 mil difference isn't much at all. (remember to count all of the 527's that George and his minions are running)
Okay then:
Somebody forget the 2008 election?
Candidate (Party) Amount raised Amount spent Votes Average spent per vote
Barack Obama (D) $778,642,962 $760,370,195 69,498,215 $10.94
link
How about 2012?
Barack Obama (D)
Mitt Romney (R)
Raised $715,677,692 $446,135,997
Spent $683,546,548 $433,281,516
Debts $7,223,153 $1,200,000
Cash
(on Hand) $5,397,399 $12,921,629
l
linky 2
