I want a lamborghini! (POL)

When they hand over tissue, are they not handed back cash?

The premise of your question presumes they are giving tissue for profit. So again - do you have a source that can back that up? I mean besides the clown-show media source that was used to start this thread?

And if not then what does that say about your integrity given your other thread about Huff Post?

Here's the definition of a "sale" from Dictionary.com.

"the exchange of a commodity for money". In this can the "commodity" is body parts, and the money is US dollars.

One can assume that the "Income Statement" is positively affected by the sale of body parts. PJ will certainly provide documentation to prove otherwise if he still argues that they are not profiting from the sale (see definition above) of body parts.

I didn't start this thread or give credence to the baseless claim it makes - so I need not prove anything.

Boilerman claims sales of tissue are happening. But he's given us the same source he used to claim
- Ebola was airborn
- Hillary did something evil in Bengazhi
- The president ordering IRS targeting of conservative groups.
- The IRS's budget spending
which is to say no source. Because even while Boilerman blasts liberaly biased media sources like Huffington Post he feels no need to do any homework beyond an edited video from "familyfoundation.org"

Boiler, since you have dictionary.com opened up in your browser - can you look up the definition of "hypocrite"?

PJ, does Planned Parenthood not hand over body parts in return for cash?

Seems like simple enough question and while I read that vid had some pretty heavy editing( I haven't watched it, pick my battles), it does seem that PP is indeed making money off fetuses. Refute it if you can PJ. Or keep bringing up past topics that have absolutely nothing to do with the OT here as you are so prone to do.

When is a sale not a sale? When a Liberal claims it's so.

I posted the factcheck from a Pulitzer Prize factchecking source. And it says Jpehlan's edited video doesn't say what Boilerman, Jphelan, and Jatki say it does.

So this is the same exercise we do on a daily basis on these boards. Rightwingers post conspiracy theories or articles from BS sources. And demands are made for the rest of us to refute them. It amuses me so I oblige. It amuses me even more when those same people cry about liberal media bias.

I already posted my source. I cant help it if you choose an edited video over a fact checker./

You also struggled with Jphelan's article from "The Federalist" which claimed the Clinton FOundation only gave 10% of the proceeds to charity. I cant help you with your inability to choose real journalism over fake propoganda. Its a personal choice you have to make for yourself.

Nobody choses reurnalism.