If I had a hamm-err....

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99Now come to find out the hill had up to sixteen(16!!) devicxes when she swore under oath she only used one mobile device...
On page 8 of the FBI Report it states that Secretary Clinton used eight mobile devices for email purposes "in succession." Do you know what IN SUCCESSION means?

It means one at a time.

So go to the report, read page eight, and please have the class to admit the truth. And in any case, the next time you make that claim you'll just be lying.


SERIOUSLY!? Who gives a rat's ass WHEN she used them, HOW she used them, or the EXACT number she used...
Apparently you do. It's the EXACT SUBJECT YOU STARTED THIS STARTED THIS THREAD WITH. Now you're running away from it which is cowardly and dishonest. Exactly what I'd expect from you.




They are just upset as they know that Hillary is inevitable as the sun coming up tomorrow. They need to look at the bright side four more years of boom for the right wing media. Hell, I might start a conservative news site myself.
On the bright side, they'll have four more years.flaming someone for their failures.
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
So I assume you have no evidence, just links to unrelated stuff. But she's GUILTY.


SIGH..it won't matter what I post, you'll keep repeating yourself. I beleive you have actually sunk to forky level. Congratulations. Cookie monster comprehends more than you two combined.


Last time I heard a politician claim 'I don't recall' that many times was Ronald Reagan testifying about Iran/Contra. Of course he was probably suffering from early onset Alzheimer's. Is there a test for that now?
I was thinking about Admiral Poindexter. I wondered how he managed to find his way home at night with his Swiss cheese memory.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
So I assume you have no evidence, just links to unrelated stuff. But she's GUILTY.


SIGH..it won't matter what I post, you'll keep repeating yourself. I beleive you have actually sunk to forky level. Congratulations. Cookie monster comprehends more than you two combined.





Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: billryan
So I assume you have no evidence, just links to unrelated stuff. But she's GUILTY.


SIGH..it won't matter what I post, you'll keep repeating yourself. I beleive you have actually sunk to forky level. Congratulations. Cookie monster comprehends more than you two combined.




You might try posting something germaine to your posts. Perhaps post evidence.
It wasn't Reagan my friend, it was Liarry testifying from her Rose Law Firm days trying to NOT explain Whitewater. That is what started another thread here.

I can't imagine what it might take for the Liarry defenders to actually admit to any corruption or wrongdoing on her part......but I'm hoping to see that day sometime next month.
Quote

Originally posted by: lvfritz
It wasn't Reagan my friend, it was Liarry testifying from her Rose Law Firm days trying to NOT explain Whitewater. That is what started another thread here.

I can't imagine what it might take for the Liarry defenders to actually admit to any corruption or wrongdoing on her part......but I'm hoping to see that day sometime next month.


They'll STILL find a way to defend her claiming "what evidence?", or taking things out of context, twisting meanings and any other way to squirm around it.

I am really curious what Assange is going to release.
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now