If One Doesn't Care for Free Speech, . . . .

Death threats are illegal PJ. When you figure out that death threats are not the same as speech that some find offensive, you just might be on track to recovery from a liberal mental disorder.
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Death threats are illegal PJ. When you figure out that death threats are not the same as speech that some find offensive, you just might be on track to recovery from a liberal mental disorder.

******quote***
Even though the Constitution guarantees the right of free speech, that right is not an absolute one. The law has long recognized specific limitations when it comes to speech, such as prohibitions against slander and libel. In some situations, speech can even constitute a crime, such as in the case of criminal threats. A criminal threat, sometimes known as the terrorist threat, malicious harassment, or by other terms, occurs when someone threatens to kill or physically harm someone else.

Criminal threats are made with the intention to place someone in fear of injury or death. However, it isn't necessary for a victim to actually experience fear or terror. Rather, it's the intention of the person making the threat that matters.
***endquote***

Ref: Criminal Threats
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
Death threats are illegal PJ. When you figure out that death threats are not the same as speech that some find offensive, you just might be on track to recovery from a liberal mental disorder.


What? You mean "hurtful speech" really is something that should reported to cops and something they should take action on? Thanks for the lesson. Please pass it on to author of this thread.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
You mean "hurtful speech" really is something that should reported to cops and something they should take action on? Thanks for the lesson. Please pass it on to author of this thread.
Allow the author of this thread to clarify the distinction for pjstroh:

Case 1

If someone within the LVA Vegas Free-for-All Forum were to type: "DonDiego, you are a poo-poo head", . . . that would be hurtful speech. [n.b. This has actually happened within this forum !]

Because this is nothing worse than hurtful speech, DonDiego opines that there is no reason to report it to the authorities and the police should not take action on it.


Case 2

If someone within the LVA Vegas Free-for-All Forum were to type: "DonDiego, I'm gonna pull your fingernails out and leave you to think about em. Then I'll cut your eyelids off. Then from time to time I'll pour gasoline in your eyeballs to keep you from passing out."*, this may be a criminal threat.

Because this may be a criminal threat, DonDiego may opine that he should report it to the authorities and the police should take action on it.

* This threat is spoken by Mr. Parker in the film The Way of the Gun (2000)

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Great Scott! Its already started! Police have made an arrest against an AMerican citizen for exercising his god-given right to contribute "hurtful speech" in the great Missouri PC-crybaby festival . In this case that speech came in the form of death threats against Missouri Students at the college.

I dont see any link to a gofundme account for this poor chap's defense fund - but I'm sure Don Diego can lend him some much needed moral support if nothing else.

Cops bust man for making terrorist threats
"I'm going to stand my ground tomorrow and shoot every black person I see."

"Some of you are alright. Don't go to campus tomorrow," another post read. “We’re waiting for you at the parking lots,” read a third post. “We will kill you.”


I'm in complete shock 'cause I know you're smarter than this post comes across. I'll clarify it for you tho PJ. Death threats or threats to cause physical harm are NOT free speech and beyong "hurtful" speech.

The authorities of the Missouri campus issued some safety precautions about some of the rheotirc circulating their school. That effort was mocked by DonDiego's initiation of this thread.

Well, It turns out those authorities were well justified in their precautions. Right? Does anyone still question that now? And what da ya know - the authorities at that school seem to have better insight into their local environment than DonDiego.

Don't get mad at me for presenting the facts. If you must hate me - do it because I'm beautiful.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The authorities of the Missouri campus issued some safety precautions about some of the rheotirc circulating their school. That effort was mocked by DonDiego's initiation of this thread.

Well, It turns out those authorities were well justified in their precautions. Right? Does anyone still question that now? And what da ya know - the authorities at that school seem to have better insight into their local environment than DonDiego.

Don't get mad at me for presenting the facts. If you must hate me - do it because I'm beautiful.


Well, things are starting to fizzle down in Missouri. And it turns out DD is more right than PJ.

Funny how facts seem to take the "blow" out of the blow hards rant.

What it comes down to, Cowboy, is that many Liberals believe that hurtful speech should be shut down by the government. Liberals, of course, also believe that they are rightly the arbitrator of what is hurtful and what is not.

Speech which Conservatives consider hurtful will not be considered by this group.


Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The authorities of the Missouri campus issued some safety precautions about some of the rheotirc circulating their school. That effort was mocked by DonDiego's initiation of this thread.

Well, It turns out those authorities were well justified in their precautions. Right? Does anyone still question that now? And what da ya know - the authorities at that school seem to have better insight into their local environment than DonDiego.

Don't get mad at me for presenting the facts. If you must hate me - do it because I'm beautiful.


Well, things are starting to fizzle down in Missouri. And it turns out DD is more right than PJ.

Funny how facts seem to take the "blow" out of the blow hards rant.


Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
What it comes down to, Cowboy, is that many Liberals believe that hurtful speech should be shut down by the government. Liberals, of course, also believe that they are rightly the arbitrator of what is hurtful and what is not.

Speech which Conservatives consider hurtful will not be considered by this group.


Quote

Originally posted by: CowboyKell
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The authorities of the Missouri campus issued some safety precautions about some of the rheotirc circulating their school. That effort was mocked by DonDiego's initiation of this thread.

Well, It turns out those authorities were well justified in their precautions. Right? Does anyone still question that now? And what da ya know - the authorities at that school seem to have better insight into their local environment than DonDiego.

Don't get mad at me for presenting the facts. If you must hate me - do it because I'm beautiful.


Well, things are starting to fizzle down in Missouri. And it turns out DD is more right than PJ.

Funny how facts seem to take the "blow" out of the blow hards rant.



Wait, aren't you the same conservatives that are up in arms because Starbucks took a snowflake off a coffee cup?
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The authorities of the Missouri campus issued some safety precautions about some of the rheotirc circulating their school. That effort was mocked by DonDiego's initiation of this thread.

Well, It turns out those authorities were well justified in their precautions. Right? Does anyone still question that now? And what da ya know - the authorities at that school seem to have better insight into their local environment than DonDiego.

Don't get mad at me for presenting the facts. If you must hate me - do it because I'm beautiful.
Once again pjstroh overestimates DonDiego's capacity for getting mad at and for hating anyone. DonDiego is more sad than mad about the paternalistic policies proffered by the Administration of the University of Missouri.

DonDiego is uncertain exactly what precautions pjstroh asserts are justified. And what justifies them.

The only things DonDiego knows are some of the events:

__Student body president Payton Head, who is black, wrote on Facebook in September that a group of white men had yelled racial epithets at him from the back of a pickup truck off campus.
[DonDiego condemns this behavior. It is hurtful.]

__In October a student yelled the N-word at members of the Legion of Black Collegians in a campus plaza while they were rehearsing for a play.
[DonDiego objects to this behavior. It is hurtful.]

__A student asserted that someone had scrawled a swastika using his/her own feces on the wall of a stall in a uni-sex bathroom in Gateway Hall, a dormitory, at approximately 2:00am on 24 October. A campus police report confirms the presence of the excrement.
[DonDiego objects to this behavior. DonDiego recognizes the symbolism of the swastika underwent significant change during the first half of the 20th century. He does not know exactly what the intended message of the "scrawler" is in this matter; he suspects it is negative.
DonDiego has personally seen evidence of dung, urine, and other bodily fluids apparently deposited intentionally in public restrooms on floors, walls, seats, mirrors, etc. He considers it vandalism. (Perhaps DonDiego should frequent more attractive public restrooms.) He does not know what message the individual depositors intended.
So: Who is "the scrawler"? Is Gateway Hall a Black dormitory? DonDiego has more questions than answers.]

__On 7 November The Legion of Black Collegians announced via Twitter that a group of black players on the University of Missouri football would stop participating in football activities until University System President Tim Wolfe resigns.
[DonDiego recognizes a human right to cease participation in organized sports]

__On 9 November University of Missouri System President Tim Wolfe announced his resignation.

__On Monday 9 November campus protestors led by Assistant Professor of Mass Media Melisssa Click attempted to have a student photographer on freelance assignment for ESPN from photographing the protest. Professor Click was videotaped requesting a nearby large student to provide her some "muscle" to remove the photographer. Once the video became public, Professor Click resigned from one of her two positions on campus.
[DonDiego objects strenously to Professor Click's attempt to violate the First Amendmen right of the student photographer. He applauds the removal of Professor Click from at least one of her positions; DonDiego counsels the reader to investigate Professor Click's published, and unpublished, scholarly works to observe for themselves what a worthless burden she is on the taxpayers of Missouri.]

__On 10 November Hunter Park, a computer science student at the Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, Mo. - 75 miles from the University of Missouri campus - posted a message on Yik-Yak, an anonymous location-based online app, stating "I’m going to stand my ground tomorrow and shoot every black person I see” and later “Some of you are alright. Don’t go to campus tomorrow.”
At 1:50am on 11 November Mr. Park was arrested in Rolla and transported to Columbia, Mo.
[DonDiego condemns this illegal behavior. Mr. Park's arrest seems quite appropriate and efficient.]

__Campus Police Captain Brian Weime informed KRCG-TV there was also a threat called in to the Black Culture Center on campus on 10 November. He said someone answering the phone perceived the phone call as a threat.
[DonDiego objects to someone making threatening telephone calls.]

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now