Immunity for ex-staffer who set up Clinton email server

Interesting question.

The initial questions to be asked of a now-immunized Bryan Pagliano will likely address just how the presumedly secure State Department e-mail account of the Secretary of State was transferred to a non-secure personal server in her Chappaqua, New York home.

And who had access to the transferred information and what was their clearance, if any. [If Mr. Pagliano was not yet cleared to handle classified data, . . . that might indicate why his lawyer(s) sought immunity.]

Maybe a more interesting answer will follow, . . . or not.

Are we going to see Boiler and Jatki mount their high horses about Trump and his fraudulent Trump University anytime soon?

Why would the IT guy need immunity? Hard to tell if this is a real issue or just the new Benghazi for the right wing to blow things out of proportion and harp on.

What the hell are you talking about? Let alone do you have a reading comprehension deficit now you're just making shit up, how lame can you get? I've never ever said a word about T.U. (tell you the truth, never heard of it before the other night) and it sounds shady to on the surface, much like the Clinton foundation, well maybe a little more legit than that. Plus I don't eat popcorn that often and I know for certain I've never made reference to any disambiguation consumption ever on this forum. Get a clue O' great one, you look foolish.

Questions, questions, . . . questions, . . .

That is, nonetheless, an excellent question. What could he have done to expose him to the "long arm of the Law" while employed as the Secretary of State's personal IT guy? So who, other than the Secretray of State, was supervising the "new guy"?

Don Diego's earlier post [of 2:32 PM] addressed the possibility of classified information being available to someone not authorized to see it.

Mr. Pagliano had previously served as IT director of Clinton’s unsuccessful campaign for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

Upon Ms. Clinton's assumption of the Office of Secretary of State, Mr. Pagliano was hired by the State Department; he earned around $140,000 per year and was classified as a GS-15 in his job as a Special Advisor and Deputy Chief Information Officer in the Bureau of Information Resource Management (BIRM).

The Washington Post has already reported that Secretary of State Clinton personally paid Pagliano additionally for his services maintaining the private e-mail server she used for her official correspondence. [n.b. "personally paid"]

The Washington Post added that “Pagliano did not list the outside income in the required personal financial disclosures he filed each year.” [Uh-Oh !]

But wait, . . . there's more:
In February 2013, the same month Hillary left as Secretary of State, Pagliano’s GS-15 employee status ended and he joined Gartner, Inc. a global IT company.
On January 3, 2013, the State Department had awarded Gartner $212,871.29 for an employee to work in the State Department's BIRM. Although the State Department has refused to disclose Pagliano’s contractor or any other details about his current or past employment status, Mr. Pagliano continued to work in the BIRM after his GS-15 Government Employment ended.

Questions, questions, . . . questions, . . .

Maybe the need for immunity is addressed by something in the above narrative, . . . or maybe not. Nonetheless, Mr. Pagliano's lawyers wanted immunization for some reason !

You gotta be kidding me? You bust on another source and take Michelle Yee hee, a lefty reporter from the Wash. Post as Gospel? What a joke, not that I buy whatever Detroit article you refer to but c'mon. He said, she said.

No one should testify before a Grand Jury without immunity. They are fishing expeditions and a lawyer will always seek immunity for someone who is not the target of the investigation.

Boilerman claims the FBI has recommended an indictment. Would boilerman be so kind as to disclose where he read, heard or imagined this?

So he can sing like a canary without fear of jail. Haven't you ever watched Law and Order?

Had Billy, or anyone else for that matter, wanted further confirmation, it's widely available only a Google News click away. Pick, CNN, Fox News, and twenty others. We won't see this report until next week in the NY Times, however, as the concept of Hillary going to jail makes them wet their panties.

Billy, just Google and choose a source that pleases you.

From the onlineslangdictionary:
sing like a canary:
v. to provide the police with information that may incriminate another party

Or as DonDiego used to say in the hood, "That bastard ratted us out !"