Well, lets see. I've ready many articles about how this works and it's always explained like this. To get a US federal judge to sign off on such immunity, it must be preceded by a request for indictment from the State Department. Since the State Department hasn't been involved until recently, it's clear that the request for indictment originated with the FBI. Do the research and find any source that you like, but Judge Napolitano does a wonderful job of explaining it. Please open the attached and then open the video if you like.
Oh, and before you rip Judge Nap as a worthless source because he appears on Fox, you might first consider that he was a NJ Supreme Court Justice. He currently teaches constitutional law as a Distinguished Professor at Brooklyn Law School.
The likelihood of a Hillary indictment just jumped to near 100%.
Judge Nap on Hillary's problems
Oh, and before you rip Judge Nap as a worthless source because he appears on Fox, you might first consider that he was a NJ Supreme Court Justice. He currently teaches constitutional law as a Distinguished Professor at Brooklyn Law School.
The likelihood of a Hillary indictment just jumped to near 100%.
Judge Nap on Hillary's problems
Quote
Originally posted by: billryan
No one should testify before a Grand Jury without immunity. They are fishing expeditions and a lawyer will always seek immunity for someone who is not the target of the investigation.
Boilerman claims the FBI has recommended an indictment. Would boilerman be so kind as to disclose where he read, heard or imagined this?
Originally posted by: billryan
No one should testify before a Grand Jury without immunity. They are fishing expeditions and a lawyer will always seek immunity for someone who is not the target of the investigation.
Boilerman claims the FBI has recommended an indictment. Would boilerman be so kind as to disclose where he read, heard or imagined this?