Instant Protest

So, . . . say one wants to protest against someone.

And that someone wants to protest really bad, . . . and really, really quickly! Because the object of his protest is really, truly evil. But that someone doesn't know exactly whom he wants to protest against so vehemently.

What is a protestor to do?

Well, . . .he could just print up the protest signs in advance, . . . and add the name at the last minute:



What a maroon !

Actually poor old DonDiego wouldn't be surprised if the protestor and his allies haven't printed up millions of these signs, . . . just in case they'd come in handy later, . . . against more truly evil folks.
Efficiency at its finest.


Of course some folks have a different opinion: The Washington Post

#stop DD and the use of the term "Maroons". They were a fine Pennsylvania football team from Pottsville and using their name in this manner is a discredit to their Championship legacy(of which they were robbed).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pottsville_Maroons

The appointment of Gorsuch will add one more Conservative Supreme Court Justice who believes that legislation should come from Congress, and not the bench.

Boiler believes, for instance, that Roe vs Wade is Constitutional. While I don't like this law, I do not want an activist Conservative judge to strike down ANY constitutional law. I wish Liberals similarly believed in our Constitution.

I wish people could see just how stupid they sound when they speak or write in the third person.

Winning the popular vote doesn't mean winning the championship.

pjstroh agrees

Reading the postings by PJ and billryan prove that one does not have to speak in the third person in order to sound stupid....

On the other hand, . . . it couldn't hurt.

What's the big deal here, replacing scalia with another conserative judge doesn't change the court, it just puts it back to the way it was.

I have been a dormant person. What I have is my view. No parade, or riot. Just what is true to me.