ISIS Propaganda Video

PJ can not show when Boiler has supported Donald Trump. I have, however, supported some things that Trump is said as correct, right, and true. Disallowing Muslim into our country, for example. Boiler would similarly support such claims if liar Hillary took such a stance, but she is far too PC to do so.

Once again, PJ has nothing and is left with changing the subject.


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
So PJ agrees that Hillary, with the most extensive information machine that money can buy, didn't have a clue if her comments were true (or she was lying)........................all along assuming that the far far left leaning media would ignore her bull shit.

I'm glad that PJ has cleared up my confusion.



Yes, I agree! And I can see that once again you will hold Hillary to a different standard than any candidate you support. I look forward to more of Boilerman's rants about lies going forward - even as he waves his pom-poms for Politifact's liar of the year for 2015 (the undisputed king of the Obama birth certificate conspiracy).


So PJ doesn't like being lied to, yet he's a Hillary supporter. Apparently, free shit trumps all indiscretions.

"It's a great right-wing conspiracy." Her White Water files just appeared out of thin air. Yada, yada, yada. What Liberals should be most burned about regarding Hillary was her use of the Clinton machine to ruin the lives of those her husband had sex with. Apparently Feminists also live by the "Free shit trumps all indiscretions" mantra.


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: BobOrme
PJ agrees that Politifact was right about Hillary lying. He does not say anything about her lying being a bad thing. Not one word. Instead, he deflects away from Hillary lying and attacks others for lying...then he attacks other posters for not also attacking the other people he attacks for lying...then he brings Lie of the Year into the discussion. Øbama got the Lie of the Year award last year. I don't recall PJ attacking Øbama for his Lie of the Year.


I didn't start this thread on the premise that a candidate being untruthful might call into question their legitimacy as a candidate. Someone else made that point. And plenty of our usual suspects jumped on board to agree.

But they don't really agree - and neither do you, Bob. Because if they (you) did then you would hold everyone to the same standard - and they (you) don't. Instead, you're just really upset that I've pointed to your hypocrisy. Try not to get to upset. Its the Holiday Season after all.

And for the record - I don't make excuses for Hillary's lies. I don't like being lied to - especially by Democrats. I hold them to a much higher standard of integrity than Neanderthals who scare their base into believing our current president was born in Kenya.


I'm not sure what is a bigger burden, a President where the majority of folks don't believe a word they are saying, or a President where the majority of folks are embarrassed?

I would be embarrassed with Trump as president. He's immature, can't speak intelligently on ANY topic as far as I can tell, and he's just annoying. On the other hand, I don't trust a word Obama and Hilary say. Hearing them speak, I don't believe that THEY believe what they are saying. And that's disturbing. So I guess I'm kind of screwed in this upcoming election.

Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
So PJ doesn't like being lied to, yet he's a Hillary supporter. Apparently, free shit trumps all indiscretions.



No, I'm a Bernie Sanders supporter, thank you very much. And I don't defend Hillary - I just defend the truth. For example - like when you completely fabricate criminal charges against Hillary over Bengazhi that you cant articulate or show in any meaningful way. Or another example....when a right wing blog site makes up financial data regarding the Clinton Foundation charity.

Defending the truth instead of a political agenda makes it easy to point out a lie regardless of who tells it - Hillary Clinton, Or Donald Trump, or you.







So after a year pj finally admits that Clinton is a liar, but not a bad enough liar to be indicted. A noble position except that the Justice dept which is staffed by democrats is not going to indict their candidate.

So in pj's Bizzaro world Hillary is ok.
Good to see that PJ supports a Socialist for President.
Well done Comrade.
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
So after a year pj finally admits that Clinton is a liar, but not a bad enough liar to be indicted. A noble position except that the Justice dept which is staffed by democrats is not going to indict their candidate.

So in pj's Bizzaro world Hillary is ok.


Boilerman promised us the FBI would indict her. How's that going? And speaking of lies - did you ever get the name of the Syrian refugee that bombed Paris?

I'll stack my honesty and integrity against that of any of you clowns. And lets be sure to bookmark this post for next November when Hoops and Boilerman cast their vote for Politifact's liar of the year.
Since the FBI reports to the Justice Dept run by the democrats there is no way she will be indicted.

But what is the difference between General Petraeus and hillary?

Ted Cruz for me thank you.....
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now