ISIS Propaganda Video

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiegoDonDiego suggests the video may not be a campaign fabrication, . . . more likely the Islamists are just taking advice from Secretary Clinton after realizing all she's already done for them.


Im (sic) sure its (sic) embarrassing for the righties that Hillary's point proved to be correct: Rhetoric from Xenophobic neandrathals (sic) does more harm than good in the war against Islamic extremism.

lest you believe ISIS would spend money and resources on propoganda they belived ineffective...and that they have a vested interest in the US presidential election. Oh wait, i think thats (sic) what DonDiego just suggested.
A review of the facts:
__On 19 December 2015 Secretary Hillary stated: "They [ISIS] are going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists."

__Within hours Politifact concluded:...
From DonDiego's source:

The campaign pointed to an NBC News article that quoted Rita Katz of the SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors the social media activities of Islamic terrorist groups.

"They love him from the sense that he is supporting their rhetoric," she said. "They follow everything Donald Trump says. When he says, 'No Muslims should be allowed in America,' they tell people, 'We told you America hates Muslims and here is proof.' "


Thank you, DonDiego.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiegoDonDiego suggests the video may not be a campaign fabrication, . . . more likely the Islamists are just taking advice from Secretary Clinton after realizing all she's already done for them.


Im (sic) sure its (sic) embarrassing for the righties that Hillary's point proved to be correct: Rhetoric from Xenophobic neandrathals (sic) does more harm than good in the war against Islamic extremism.

lest you believe ISIS would spend money and resources on propoganda they belived ineffective...and that they have a vested interest in the US presidential election. Oh wait, i think thats (sic) what DonDiego just suggested.
A review of the facts:
__On 19 December 2015 Secretary Hillary stated: "They [ISIS] are going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists."

__Within hours Politifact concluded:...
From DonDiego's source:

The campaign pointed to an NBC News article that quoted Rita Katz of the SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors the social media activities of Islamic terrorist groups.

"They love him from the sense that he is supporting their rhetoric," she said. "They follow everything Donald Trump says. When he says, 'No Muslims should be allowed in America,' they tell people, 'We told you America hates Muslims and here is proof.' "


Thank you, DonDiego.


"To read a further "But while such quotes support the notion that ISIS could be making recruiting videos, or will do so, they do not support Clinton’s contention -- offered in the present tense -- that they are currently doing so."

Oh yea, they declared the claim false Forkie. SHEESH

BTW How much do you believe snopes, I've never heard a peep from you on it. Do you want me to repeat my post? Also you want to explain your twisting of the the headline"Obama, Americas first gay president? that you claimed was your reason for trashing a source?

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiegoDonDiego suggests the video may not be a campaign fabrication, . . . more likely the Islamists are just taking advice from Secretary Clinton after realizing all she's already done for them.


Im (sic) sure its (sic) embarrassing for the righties that Hillary's point proved to be correct: Rhetoric from Xenophobic neandrathals (sic) does more harm than good in the war against Islamic extremism.

lest you believe ISIS would spend money and resources on propoganda they belived ineffective...and that they have a vested interest in the US presidential election. Oh wait, i think thats (sic) what DonDiego just suggested.
A review of the facts:
__On 19 December 2015 Secretary Hillary stated: "They [ISIS] are going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists."

__Within hours Politifact concluded:...
From DonDiego's source:

The campaign pointed to an NBC News article that quoted Rita Katz of the SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors the social media activities of Islamic terrorist groups.

"They love him from the sense that he is supporting their rhetoric," she said. "They follow everything Donald Trump says. When he says, 'No Muslims should be allowed in America,' they tell people, 'We told you America hates Muslims and here is proof.' "


Thank you, DonDiego.


"To read a further "But while such quotes support the notion that ISIS could be making recruiting videos, or will do so, they do not support Clinton’s contention -- offered in the present tense -- that they are currently doing so."..
Yep. So if Clinton had said they are showing "information about" Donald Trump instead of showing "videos of" Donald Trump, she would have been 100% accurate, right?

Wow, the "gotcha" of the century! Thanks DonDiego.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Thanks DonDiego.
DonDiego finds it a pleasure to be of service to the interested readers, if any, of the Las Vegas Advisor.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiegoDonDiego suggests the video may not be a campaign fabrication, . . . more likely the Islamists are just taking advice from Secretary Clinton after realizing all she's already done for them.


Im (sic) sure its (sic) embarrassing for the righties that Hillary's point proved to be correct: Rhetoric from Xenophobic neandrathals (sic) does more harm than good in the war against Islamic extremism.

lest you believe ISIS would spend money and resources on propoganda they belived ineffective...and that they have a vested interest in the US presidential election. Oh wait, i think thats (sic) what DonDiego just suggested.
A review of the facts:
__On 19 December 2015 Secretary Hillary stated: "They [ISIS] are going to people showing videos of Donald Trump insulting Islam and Muslims in order to recruit more radical jihadists."

__Within hours Politifact concluded:...
From DonDiego's source:

The campaign pointed to an NBC News article that quoted Rita Katz of the SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors the social media activities of Islamic terrorist groups.

"They love him from the sense that he is supporting their rhetoric," she said. "They follow everything Donald Trump says. When he says, 'No Muslims should be allowed in America,' they tell people, 'We told you America hates Muslims and here is proof.' "


Thank you, DonDiego.


"To read a further "But while such quotes support the notion that ISIS could be making recruiting videos, or will do so, they do not support Clinton’s contention -- offered in the present tense -- that they are currently doing so."..
Yep. So if Clinton had said they are showing "information about" Donald Trump instead of showing "videos of" Donald Trump, she would have been 100% accurate, right?

Wow, the "gotcha" of the century! Thanks DonDiego.


Also included.."The article also quoted David Phillips, director of the Program on Peace-Building and Rights at Columbia University's Institute for the Study of Human Rights, saying that "Trump's incendiary anti-Muslim comments will surely be used by ISIS social media to demonize the United States and attract recruits to fight in Iraq and Syria."

But while such quotes support the notion that ISIS could be making recruiting videos, or will do so, they do not support Clinton’s contention -- offered in the present tense -- that they are currently doing so.

Vox.com tweeted at J.M. Berger, author of the book ISIS: The State of Terror, and Berger tweeted back, "I would be surprised if they had and we didn't hear about it in a big way."

The fact that you spin things in a ridiculous way. Often. Shall I repost my gruden post?

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now