Vegas Free-for-All - It only took 36 months, but Democrats finally turn over Benghazi ambassador emails

Boilerman

Oct 22, 2015
12:11am

1296 pages of Chris Stevens emails are turned over...............finally.............. three years after being requested. PJ, Forkie and friends keep asking for evidence, and Boiler continued to point out the due to Democrat obstruction, much of the evidence was unavailable.

I also heard today that the FBI is expected to recover most of the emails that Hillary deleted. Furthermore, many government related emails involving Hillary were recently turned over by Sidney Blumenthal..............and as everyone expected, many of these were deleted by Hillary. Many of these deleted emails related to Benghazi.

Forkie calls this old news, but all this evidence is brand-spanking new. Obstruction continues, but in time they will get to the bottom of Hillary and Barack's corruption.

pjstroh

Oct 22, 2015
4:42am

Block User

The mouth breathers running the Benghazi circus are running out of excuses to keep the circus going. And they aren't helped by Republican Congressman that make the mistake of speaking honestly about their motivations. They aren't too bright. Low IQ's are an unfortunate symptom of inbreeding.

The hearing today centers around trying to make Hillary Clinton accountable for the opinions of somebody else that sent her an email. And that's pretty much what Boilerman's grand conspiracy of high crimes and misdemeanors has boiled down to. What an embarrassing shame for the birthers.

But look on the Brightside. When Republicans have to explain to their base why they haven't made any progress on tax reform they will have a great excuse: they spent 9 months throwing rocks at Hillary Clinton.

Boilerman

Oct 22, 2015
4:47am

Block User

Does PJ still believe that Hillary will be proven to not be corrupt?

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
The mouth breathers running the Benghazi circus are running out of excuses to keep the circus going. And they aren't helped by Republican Congressman that make the mistake of speaking honestly about their motivations. They aren't too bright. Low IQ's are an unfortunate symptom of inbreeding.

The hearing today centers around trying to make Hillary Clinton accountable for the opinions of somebody else that sent her an email. And that's pretty much what Boilerman's grand conspiracy of high crimes and misdemeanors has boiled down to. What an embarrassing shame for the birthers.

But look on the Brightside. When Republicans have to explain to their base why they haven't made any progress on tax reform they will have a great excuse: they spent 9 months throwing rocks at Hillary Clinton.

pjstroh

Oct 22, 2015
5:28am

Block User

She has no obligation to prove she is not corrupt...nor is she even accused of any crime. but the fact that you admit to that being the point of the Bengazhi hearings confirms that you and Congressman McCarthy are on the same page about the tax dollars being spent In this endeavor.

Most of us already knew that but its nice to hear it from the horse's mouth nonetheless

Boilerman

Oct 22, 2015
5:38am

Block User

Oh my, when did I ever admit that the Benghazi hearings are to prove Hillary's corruption? PJ once again dodges the question.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
She has no obligation to prove she is not corrupt...nor is she even accused of any crime. but the fact that you admit to that being the point of the Bengazhi hearings confirms that you and Congressman McCarthy are on the same page about the tax dollars being spent In this endeavor.

Most of us already knew that but its nice to hear it from the horse's mouth nonetheless

pjstroh

Oct 22, 2015
6:11am

Block User

Your question is your admission. If the Bengazhi trial isn't about Hillary proving her innocence of your baseless conspiracy then why do you keep asking if she will prove herself such?

Do I need to provide links to the million posts youve made about all the "fun" you were going to have about the revelation of Hillary's criminal activity? At some point you are going to have to put up or confess you've been wrong for 12 months. Or not. If the past is any clue you'll just move on to a new baseless conspiracy.

drmilled

Oct 22, 2015
6:19am

Block User

P.J. - are you really that obtuse?

Boilerman

Oct 22, 2015
6:21am

Block User

Fabricate things if you must, PJ. Is PJ still going to dodge the question.............as more evidence piles in? As lots of government related emails are being turned over by others............emails that Hillary assured us didn't exist. Boiler claimed that this would happen, and Boiler claims that more evidence will come to bare.

How can this be, after Hillary promised that she turned over all evidence? How does PJ reconcile this? I won't expect a straight answer.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Your question is your admission. If the Bengazhi trial isn't about Hillary proving her innocence of your baseless conspiracy then why do you keep asking if she will prove herself such?

Do I need to provide links to the million posts youve made about all the "fun" you were going to have about the revelation of Hillary's criminal activity? At some point you are going to have to put up or confess you've been wrong for 12 months. Or not. If the past is any clue you'll just move on to a new baseless conspiracy.

pjstroh

Oct 22, 2015
7:29am

Block User

Sorry - I dont know how to answer your question. My IQ isn't low enough. 12 months you cant tell me what you beleve she is corrupt of....but im suppossed to tell you what she is not corrupt of? And you demand this answer while insisting the hearings aren't about a Hillary witch hunt. Nothing else to say here, really. Ill just point and laugh.

Boilerman

Oct 22, 2015
7:41am

Block User

I believe that Hillary is corrupt over many issues. Her decision to obstruct justice hasn't been done to prove her guilt, but instead to hide her guilt. Now that Hilly's emails are coming out, PJ isn't so sure about claiming her innocence.

Oh, this is getting fun watching the truth come to light.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Sorry - I dont know how to answer your question. My IQ isn't low enough. 12 months you cant tell me what you beleve she is corrupt of....but im suppossed to tell you what she is not corrupt of? And you demand this answer while insisting the hearings aren't about a Hillary witch hunt. Nothing else to say here, really. Ill just point and laugh.

1 ›»

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:

Diamond Membership

$3 per month

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Limited Member Rewards Online

Join Now

Platinum Membership

$50 per year

Unlimited access to LVA website

Exclusive subscriber-only content

Exclusive Member Rewards Book

Join Now