Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

It only took 36 months, but Democrats finally turn over Benghazi ambassador emails

pjstroh
pjstroh
Dec 9, 2015
1:06am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
Panetta said they didn't have time to bring in the military. This email said the military was ready to go & was waiting for approval, which never came.


You said that Shrillery didn't make the call for more troops - but it was never her call to make. So you made shit up again and posted it on this board, Hoops. Because thats what you do, Hoops. because you are a serial liar, Hoops.

Bash did not determine whether forces could arrive in time - that was not his decision to make. There was a whole hearing on this subject and even the Republican Chariman of that hearing was satisfied with the military response. Here - I'll give you a news source that you can relate too. Even FOX News confirms the military response was adequate - and your new conspiracy theory from Mouthbreather.com is another in a long line of bullshit posts from you.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/10/gop-chairman-satisfied-with-military-response-to-benghazi-attack/

"Republicans are pressing ahead with multiple congressional investigations, but Rep. Howard "Buck" McKeon, R-Calif., said the military did what it reasonably could during a chaotic night of two separate attacks on Sept. 11, 2012. The assault killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.

"I think I've pretty well been satisfied that given where the troops were, how quickly the thing all happened and how quickly it dissipated, we probably couldn't have done more than we did," McKeon told reporters at a roundtable discussion. "Now, we've made changes since then. We've got more Marine fast teams that we built up security around the world.""
Boilerman
Boilerman
Dec 9, 2015
1:27am
Block User
PJ, you really should stop digging.


Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
Panetta said they didn't have time to bring in the military. This email said the military was ready to go & was waiting for approval, which never came.


You said that Shrillery didn't make the call for more troops - but it was never her call to make. So you made shit up again and posted it on this board, Hoops. Because thats what you do, Hoops. because you are a serial liar, Hoops.

Bash did not determine whether forces could arrive in time - that was not his decision to make. There was a whole hearing on this subject and even the Republican Chariman of that hearing was satisfied with the military response. Here - I'll give you a news source that you can relate too. Even FOX News confirms the military response was adequate - and your new conspiracy theory from Mouthbreather.com is another in a long line of bullshit posts from you.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/10/gop-chairman-satisfied-with-military-response-to-benghazi-attack/

"Republicans are pressing ahead with multiple congressional investigations, but Rep. Howard "Buck" McKeon, R-Calif., said the military did what it reasonably could during a chaotic night of two separate attacks on Sept. 11, 2012. The assault killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.

"I think I've pretty well been satisfied that given where the troops were, how quickly the thing all happened and how quickly it dissipated, we probably couldn't have done more than we did," McKeon told reporters at a roundtable discussion. "Now, we've made changes since then. We've got more Marine fast teams that we built up security around the world.""


rdwoodpecker
rdwoodpecker
Dec 9, 2015
7:26am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
Panetta said they didn't have time to bring in the military. This email said the military was ready to go & was waiting for approval, which never came.


You said that Shrillery didn't make the call for more troops - but it was never her call to make. So you made shit up again and posted it on this board, Hoops. Because thats what you do, Hoops. because you are a serial liar, Hoops.

Bash did not determine whether forces could arrive in time - that was not his decision to make. There was a whole hearing on this subject and even the Republican Chariman of that hearing was satisfied with the military response. Here - I'll give you a news source that you can relate too. Even FOX News confirms the military response was adequate - and your new conspiracy theory from Mouthbreather.com is another in a long line of bullshit posts from you.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/10/gop-chairman-satisfied-with-military-response-to-benghazi-attack/

"Republicans are pressing ahead with multiple congressional investigations, but Rep. Howard "Buck" McKeon, R-Calif., said the military did what it reasonably could during a chaotic night of two separate attacks on Sept. 11, 2012. The assault killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.

"I think I've pretty well been satisfied that given where the troops were, how quickly the thing all happened and how quickly it dissipated, we probably couldn't have done more than we did," McKeon told reporters at a roundtable discussion. "Now, we've made changes since then. We've got more Marine fast teams that we built up security around the world.""




Sad thing is that the Stevens asked for more protection and they pretty much did little to give the protection needed. If you can't protect them just get them out of these situations!
Those calls for extra security did go directly to Hillary's office.
rdwoodpecker
rdwoodpecker
Dec 9, 2015
7:29am
Block User
I am shocked that you PJ would keep sticking up for this lady! She has a problem telling anyone the truth for the past 20 years, why are you so protective of her. She is just another political CROOK.

chefantwon
chefantwon
Dec 9, 2015
8:49am
Block User
PJ why is it so hard to understand that Stevens was put out there to die? Hiliary and co. didn't give a rats ass about him so they ignored any requests for extra security. Once the terrorists attacked they had to act all concerned to save face.

Boilerman
Boilerman
Dec 9, 2015
10:28am
Block User
I don't believe that Obama, Hillary, and friends believe that those in the embassy and compound would be killed, however they understood when they told forces to "stand down", that it was a possibility. Obama weighed this risk vs the downside of having to admit shortly before the election that terrorism was, in fact, not under control, and they rolled the dice................and others lost their lives. Hillary and Obama are both a long term risk if the truth comes out.
hoops2
hoops2
Dec 9, 2015
7:58pm
Block User
On Sunday Clinton said she did not tell the families it was a video. Interviews with the families contradict this.
Boilerman
Boilerman
Dec 9, 2015
10:18pm
Block User
Hillary wants us to believe that four different people from three families didn't hear what they claim to have heard. She wants us to believe that they all misunderstood Hillary during separate private meetings, and that she never mentioned the video being the cause of the killings.

I choose to think that Hillary is lying once again, because that's the only logical conclusion.


Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
On Sunday Clinton said she did not tell the families it was a video. Interviews with the families contradict this.


hoops2
hoops2
Dec 9, 2015
10:25pm
Block User
"I am shocked that you PJ would keep sticking up for this lady! "

If hillary and obama said it was snowing in Vegas in July, pj would believe them even if pj was standing on the Vegas strip
Boilerman
Boilerman
Dec 9, 2015
11:02pm
Block User
Hoops, I strongly believe that PJ knows that Hillary and Obama are rampant liars, yet he doesn't care. He doesn't want the lies to interfere with their agendas, so he is willing to ignore the lies and even support the lies.


Quote
Originally posted by: hoops2
"I am shocked that you PJ would keep sticking up for this lady! "

If hillary and obama said it was snowing in Vegas in July, pj would believe them even if pj was standing on the Vegas strip


Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now