It only took 36 months, but Democrats finally turn over Benghazi ambassador emails

Here's one example of a hundred threads where Boilerman delights in the fun of Hillary being at the center of Bengazhi hearings.....and he even uses Breitbart.com as his source.

I didn't fabricate his posts - but he sure wishes I did because they must be embarrassing for him:
Google makes it easy to find Boilerman's skeletons

PJ is willing to throw stones, but as the truth finally begins to become public he's clamming up about Hillary's innocence. Cat got your tongue?

Missed most of it, had a dentist appt., plus forgot about it but have been able to backtrack some. Directtv rocks in some areas.
After watching Adam Sanders and he had his nose so far up her ass, his entire face was brown, then it became pretty obvious that it was somewhat scripted or at least ran by the Clinton team. Every time the camera turned to her she looked like the Cheshire cat. It kind of looked like she knew pretty much what he was going to say, smiling, nodding, thinking "yep, that's it, keep going..". Maybe I'm thinking too much like a conspirator ala Malibber.
Now it's just somewhat comical. Dems doing nothing but attacking, screaming partisanship, and kissing Hillary's ass, Rep.'s trying to grill Hillary and get her to admit to..well...something, and trying to prove it's not partisan.
Man did McCarthy ever make a Biden Gaffe or what? The Clinton team and the Dem.'s are running with that like a cat in heat, and it won't stop but by the time they do, it will be drilled into every soccer mom, housewife, gym rat and dimwit's head that it's nothing but a Rep attack on poor Hillary. And it'll work. I watched the first one and the Dems never mentioned a word about a partisan attack directed at Hillary. Now after MacCarthy's huge gaffe, that's all it is.

See what the second half brings.

Representative Kevin McCarthy, 29 September, 2015:
"Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought."

DonDiego sees a recitation of facts, . . . not a gaffe.
Over the objections of Democrats and others the Republicans established a Special Committee to investigate the unfortunate incidents in Behghazi to try to find out why this failure to protect the US Ambassador to Libya was permitted by those in charge at the State Department. [This is a fact.]
Ms. Clinton's poll numbers related to the 2016 Presidential Election have dropped from over 60% to the mid-40s%; Senator Sanders poll numbers have concurrently risen from 5% to the mid-20s%. [This is a fact.]

One may surmise that the formation and actions of the Special Committee have had an effect on the electoral polls. i.e.Representative McCarthy may be correct that the Committee's inquiry has indicated that Ms. Clinton is "untreatable".

But it is not a demonstrable fact that formation of the Special Committee was designed explicitly or solely to damage Ms. Clinton's prospects.

It would be nice to know who is responsible for the absence of security at the State Department ambassadorial facilities.
And who was behind the State Department lies that the "demonstration" was the result of an anti-Islamist propaganda film.
And lots of other inconsistencies.

Like today, poor old DonDiego learned that Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time confidant to Ms.Clinton, who was in Libya representing business associates with interests in Libya at the time of the unpleasantness, had significantly better access to then-Secretary Clinton than did the Libyan Ambassador.
That's interesting.

What can I say? Its a guilty pleasure of mine to point out your lies and hypocrisy by reposting your own words.

And, again..I don't answer questions about proving a negative. I was taught the stupidity of such questions in my high school debate class. People who make accusations (like you) have an obligation to back it up with facts. But you don't. Not regarding Ebola....not regarding the IRS budget...and not regarding Hillary's criminal activity.

I understand you don't get it. I'm cool with that. Teaching you the correct way to have an intelligent debate is above my pay grade. I'm just content to let everyone else see the way you roll and laugh.

Yep. My theory is that she was feeling pretty thankful, and listening to "Hail to the Chief" playing in her head.

A gaffe is when a politician accidentally tells the truth (Michael Kinsley). So yeah, Kevin McCarthy committed a gaffe.

The funny thing is that while the Benghazi committe was designed to take down Hillary, it actually helped sink McCarthy's chances to become the Speaker. Hillary's karma ran over his dogma.

Boilerman's source for the title of this thread appears to be the Washington Examiner - this Washington Examiner:

PJ, you don't get it. Clinton lied yet again. She stated she was responsible but she never delt with the people who were supposed to work on the security. The Ambassadore asked for more security however her department did nothing. Yet she was responsible, she was as responsible of blaming smith and wesson for her grandchild finding a gun in the house and killing her mom.

Kevin McCarthy, in my opinion, was never the sharpest chisel in the toolbox. I was not upset that he killed his own chances of becoming Speaker. I felt that there were better choices.

Regarding Hillary’s karma, it’s important to keep in mind that karma is a neutral term. It can be either good or bad. So, yeah, Hillary’s got a boatload of karma.