Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
The wealthy also pay a less in social security taxes because the tax is capped. Then you get into the folks that earned their money the old fashioned way by inheriting it. Since their income is passive, they don't pay payroll taxes at all.
That is the real con. Working poor and lower middles class folks pay a higher percentage of their income into taxes than the the typical Wal-Mart heir does.
Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote
Originally posted by: billryan
It isn't an apples to oranges comparison at all. Everybody has a house(or apple). My neighbor and I have the exact same house(or apple), pay the exact same taxes, but because his income is twice mine, he pays a lower percentage of his income in taxes. We both buy the same car( or orange). We pay the same price. We pay the same sales tax but he pays a smaller percentage of his income for the tax than I did. The wealthy spend less of their income on local taxes than the less wealthy. Its a fact. Your argument that the rich have more discretionary income avoids the fact that the reason they have more is because ,percentage wise, they pay less in taxes.
The wealthy also pay a less in social security taxes because the tax is capped. Then you get into the folks that earned their money the old fashioned way by inheriting it. Since their income is passive, they don't pay payroll taxes at all.
That is the real con. Working poor and lower middles class folks pay a higher percentage of their income into taxes than the the typical Wal-Mart heir does.
Get rid of the SS cap, or at least reduce the rate at certain points would go a lonmg way to helping SS's problems. Raising the retirement age is complete and utter bullshit IMO. Why should people be forced to work until close to the end of their lives working(those who will depend on SS anyway)? Working til 67 or whatever is close to the end of your healthy, functioning life, how long til the health problems kick in?