Let your flatulence fly, scientists urge passengers

I actually went through training in an altitude chamber to test for symptoms of hypoxia (lack of oxygen) in higher altitudes. They wanted you to let the methane gas fly and not hold it in. I flew first class from Boston to Los Angeles a few years ago. Somebody was passing SBD's (silent but deadly). It was horrible. Everybody is looking at each other. We don't know who was doing it.

Let your flatulence fly, scientists urge passengers

Flying increases flatulence, according to an article published Friday in the peer-reviewed New Zealand Medical Journal, and passengers should release the gas -- or risk painful medical consequences.
Lead author Dr. Jacob Rosenberg, professor of surgery at the University of Copenhagen, said he always wondered why he had more flatulence flying than when on the ground. Then, after a recent trip, he opened his bag and noticed a water bottle "almost smashed by the change in ambient pressure," said Rosenberg. "And then I thought of the mechanisms of increased bowel air volume when flying."
It's simple. When altitude increases, pressure decreases. According to the thermodynamic principal known as the "ideal gas law," as pressure drops, volume increases. While cabins are pressurized to compensate, the mechanisms can only do so much. When the plane is at a cruising altitude of 33,000 feet, inside it's still the equivalent of 8,000 feet above sea level. That's a lot of physics bearing down on your intestines.
There's a clear medical rationale for releasing the gas. Holding back flatulence can lead to "discomfort and even pain, bloating, dyspepsia and pyrosis," according to the article, titled "Flatulence on Airplanes: Just Let it Go," which surveyed previously published research and studies. It also notes that holding back flatulence has been suggested as a major risk factor for diverticular disease, a condition where pouches develop in the wall of the colon.
But just try telling that to your seatmate.
Instead, Peter Post, a director at Emily Post institute and author of "Essential Manners for Men," recommends that travelers "hold it in until they have the opportunity to get up and release the gas in the restroom."
If you can't get to the lavatory in time, for instance, if there's turbulence and the fasten seat belt light is on, "be as discreet as possible" and release the gas, said Post. "People understand the situation and let it go."
Unfortunately, no graceful phrase or gesture exists to completely smooth over the social awkwardness of releasing your personal flatulence inside a confined space where 50 percent of the air is recirculated. An "excuse me" can really only go so far. It can even draw its own unwanted attention.
"Almost anything you say can create embarrassment and make the situation more difficult," said Post. "Your best bet is to keep your mouth shut."
[RM: Get this next paragraph]
The article's authors suggested airlines install seats embedded with active charcoal, which can absorb intestinal gases. Carriers could also pass out blankets with the odor-absorbing compound sewn in.

Travelers could also be subjected to a methane breath screening and those with higher methane content could be assigned seats in a restricted area of the plane near the lavatory. Another proposed solution involved the use of rubber pants with air containers to collect passed gas.
As for passengers, they could wear underwear lined with active charcoal, the article said.
Rosenberg said that though the paper had "a humorous direction," it's based on published research. "The background is serious," he said.
But fliers prone to gas should take preventative measures. Post suggests Beano.
It was me.
I do build up pressure on a plane.
when flying at 30,000 feet
beans are not what you should eat
but if by chance you have to fart
please be kind and have a heart
expel the gas in the bathroom not in your seat.

pffffft.
Stewardess, I'd like to order the chicken burrito with black beans, please.
(The New) Mrs. Blade was a Flight attendant for 30+ years....

She said when passengers took naps after a meal you almost needed a gas mask in the rear section of the plane where it collected. The long hauls to/from Europe were killers, girls wanted to work 1st & business just to stay out of that hot-zone.

If a full meal service is served on the flight suggest you do not book seats in the "rear" of the plane.

I expect that, at this very minute, Spirit Airlines is setting up a new seat fee:

For $20, the seat next to yours will be lined with charcoal.
This was probably a more serious issue when smoking was allowed on flights. Or in the more recent era of the shoe bomber and the underpants bomber.
Quote

Originally posted by: Blade
(The New) Mrs. Blade was a Flight attendant for 30+ years....

She said when passengers took naps after a meal you almost needed a gas mask in the rear section of the plane where it collected. The long hauls to/from Europe were killers, girls wanted to work 1st & business just to stay out of that hot-zone.

If a full meal service is served on the flight suggest you do not book seats in the "rear" of the plane.


It used to be when they allowed smoking on planes, that they would circulate air through the cabin. Nowadays they don't do that and I feel it leads to more people getting sick because germs stay in the cabin and aren't whisked out and fresh air brought in through the ducts.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now