Lying Ted Knows How To Deliver A Speech

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV Hillary voted to authorize the moron to go to war, which is why I (and a few thousand other people) kept her from becoming the nominee in 2008.



1."One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

Quoted on CNN


2."If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." — President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Quoted on CNN


3.Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." — Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

Transcript of remarks made at a Town Hall meeting in Columbus, Ohio — from USIA


4."He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." — Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb 18, 1998

Transcript of remarks made at a Town Hall Meeting in Columbus, Ohio — From USIA


5."We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the US Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." — Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry (D — MA), and others Oct. 9, 1998

See letter to Clinton by Levin, Daschle, Kerry and others


6."Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." — Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Statement by Rep. Nancy Pelosi — House of Representatives website


7."Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." — Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

Answer to a question at the Chicago Council of Foreign Affairs


8."There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." — Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

Letter to President George W. Bush signed by 9 Congressmen, including Democrats Harold Ford, Jr., Joseph Lieberman, and Benjamin Gilman.


9." We should be hell bent on getting those weapons of mass destruction, hell bent on having a credible approach to them, but we should try to do it in a way which keeps the world together and that achieves our goal which is removing the... defanging Saddam.." — Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Dec. 9, 2002

Online with Jim Lehrer — Public Broadcasting Service


10."We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

Transcript of Gore's speech, printed in USA Today


11."Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

Transcript of Gore's speech, printed in USA Today


12."We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." — Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

U.S. Senate — Ted Kennedy


13."The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." — Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

Congressional Record — Robert Byrd


14."When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security and that of our allies in the Persian Gulf region. I will vote yes because I believe it is the best way to hold Saddam Hussein accountable." —Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

Congressional Record — Sen. John F. Kerry


15."There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years .. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." — Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. Jay Rockefeller


16."He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" — Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

Congressional Record — Rep. Henry Waxman


17."In 1998, the United States also changed its underlying policy toward Iraq from containment to regime change and began to examine options to effect such a change, including support for Iraqi opposition leaders within the country and abroad. In the 4 years since the inspectors, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaida members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.

"It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East which, as we know all too well, affects American security."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. Hillary Clinton


18."The Joint Chiefs should provide Congress with casualty estimates for a war in Iraq as they have done in advance of every past conflict. These estimates should consider Saddam's possible use of chemical or biological weapons against our troops.

"Unlike the gulf war, many experts believe Saddam would resort to chemical and biological weapons against our troops in a desperate -attempt to save his regime if he believes he and his regime are ultimately threatened."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) Oct. 8, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. Ted Kennedy


19."There is one thing we agree upon, and that is that Saddam Hussein is an evil man. He is a tyrant. He has used chemical and biological weapons on his own people. He has disregarded United Nations resolutions calling for inspections of his capabilities and research and development programs. His forces regularly fire on American and British jet pilots enforcing the no-fly zones in the north and south of his country. And he has the potential to develop and deploy nuclear weapons... — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. Bob Graham


20.But inspectors have had a hard time getting truthful information from the Iraqis they interview. Saddam Hussein terrorizes his people, including his weapons scientists, so effectively that they are afraid to be interviewed in private, let alone outside the country. They know that even the appearance of cooperation could be a death sentence for themselves or their families.

"To overcome this obstacle, and to discover and dismantle Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, UNMOVIC and the IAEA must interview relevant persons securely and with their families protected, even if they protest publicly against this treatment. Hans Blix may dislike running ''a defection agency,' but that could be the only way to obtain truthful information about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction — Sen. Joseph Biden

Congressional Record — Sen. Joseph Biden


21."With respect to Saddam Hussein and the threat he presents, we must ask ourselves a simple question: Why? Why is Saddam Hussein pursuing weapons that most nations have agreed to limit or give up? Why is Saddam Hussein guilty of breaking his own cease-fire agreement with the international community? Why is Saddam Hussein attempting to develop nuclear weapons when most nations don't even try, and responsible nations that have them attempt to limit their potential for disaster? Why did Saddam Hussein threaten and provoke? Why does he develop missiles that exceed allowable limits? Why did Saddam Hussein lie and deceive the inspection teams previously? Why did Saddam Hussein not account for all of the weapons of mass destruction which UNSCOM identified? Why is he seeking to develop unmanned airborne vehicles for delivery of biological agents?
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), October 9, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. John F. Kerry


22."Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal.

"Iraq has continued to seek nuclear weapons and develop its arsenal in defiance of the collective will of the international community, as expressed through the United Nations Security Council. It is violating the terms of the 1991 cease-fire that ended the Gulf war and as many as 16 Security Council resolutions, including 11 resolutions concerning Iraq's efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction. — Sen. John Edwards, October 10, 2002

Congressional Record — Sen. John Edwards


Alan,

Those comments don't count
Apparently one person on this site doesn't know what I'm writing of. All else do.


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: IndyBoilerman
If Forkie has a good story to tell, why must he twist to truth?...
Could you be a little more vague.

Oh wait, actually could you be a little more specific. Are you saying that Tim Kaine DID write something as criminally stupid as Mike Pence's "Smoking doesn't kill?" Inquiring minds want to know!


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
I love how you believe the Putin Hacked the DNC and turned that over to Wikileaks because he loves The Donald....without a shred of evidence except 'unnamed' experts...
Don't know much about journalism either, huh alanleroy? Let me try to clear things up for you.

When a legit news organization cites unnamed experts, their statements are verified by managing editors or similar, as is the expertise of the experts. They also generally need a pretty good reason for remaining anonymous. The experts could be wrong, but they said what they said.

Not to overstate things, the hackers are almost certainly Russian. Whether they were working for Putin is deniable, but seems likely to me. TIAT


If it was the Russians, imagine how easily they got into hillary's server. They've propbably got four years of sec. of state info. then, wouldn't that be a hoot. Comey was VERY CLEAR on how careless hillary and gang were with her home server.

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
"Cruz was caught in many lies" --- please prove it.....


Man you only have to listen to what he told the Texas delegation on Friday to catch him in a lie. He started off saying that ‘He did not and WILL NOT say ANYTHING NEGATIVE about Donald Trump. Then he proceeded to go negative on Trump by relitigating the Heidi photo and the father smear. What do you call that but a lie?

Here’s a fun video that shows Cruz lying about Trump 10 times in 5 minutes. It shows the Cruz lie and then what Trump actually said, so you can see it for yourself.
Cruz lies 10 times in 5 minutes

Integrity? What about all the dirty tricks he pulled?

Rubio calls out Cruz on dirty tricks

The Man behind Cruz’s dirty tricks

Trump, Rubio and Carson zero in on Cruz’s dirty tricks

Cruz camp pulling more dirty tricks

Cruz dirty tactics

The bottom line is politicians lie and cheat. Ted Cruz is no exception. He’s no Angel. I think he’s a little worse than most because he wears his faith on his sleeve. MrsAlanLeroy liked Cruz. She's one of the 50% who changed her opinion of him after the convention. She now she thinks he's a little man. I always thought he was a phony.


Ted promised not to say anything negative about Trump and didn't at the convention. Then the next day Trump doubled down on criticizing Ted - even saying he would not accept Ted's endorsement. At this time Ted reiterated his issues with Trump assaulting Heidi and his father.

Your video is laughable as Trump has been on both sides of pretty much every issue. The video says Ted "lied" when he stated Trumps views, but without a time context and when Trump keeps changing his views (i.e. Planned Parenthood) whichever side Ted criticized Trump on, could be called a "lie". Maybe, just maybe, Ted influenced Donald to the better position?

Based upon a brief review of your "dirty tricks" links, I'll grant you that some of the campaign tactics were seedy at best. To this point, I was defending only his campaign repeating the CNN Carson story, which may have been unwise, but not "dirty".

I still support Trump over Hillary as America needs a change and Hillary is more of the same old corrupt politics. I will hold my nose and vote for Trump, but I think he acts like a spoiled brat (calling people names) and is probably just a liberal (and possibly just as corrupt) as Hillary.


Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan

Ted promised not to say anything negative about Trump and didn't at the convention. Then the next day Trump doubled down on criticizing Ted - even saying he would not accept Ted's endorsement. At this time Ted reiterated his issues with Trump assaulting Heidi and his father.

Well you've got the timing wrong. Cruz addressed the Texas Delegation Thursday July 21 at a breakfast meeting. That's when he made the servile puppy comment and brought up Donald's negatives....after saying he wouldn't. This was the morning of Trump's acceptance speech. Trump fired back at Cruz Friday July 22 in a post convention thank you session....That's when he said he wouldn't accept Cruz's endorsement.

Trump should have just said 'It was a tough Primary and Ted isn't over it. That's ok. But I welcome all Cruz voters to help me defeat Hillary Clinton in November'

Now, maybe I will hold my nose and vote for Trump too...because you're right...He acts like a spoiled brat at times. He says things that are beneath the office of the President. But I know I can't vote for Crooked Hillary.
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan


Now, maybe I will hold my nose and vote for Trump too...because you're right...He acts like a spoiled brat at times. He says things that are beneath the office of the President. But I know I can't vote for Crooked Hillary.




Agreed!
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now