Motor City Madman

There we go, and mean willing to admit the truth. Profiling helps figure out who the bad guys are.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Let me clarify. When one is dressed like a gang banger, he's more likely to hit me over the head than the guy who's in a suit. This is true regardless of color. Statistically speaking, a black guy is more likely to hit me over the head than a white guy. Crime stats prove this.

This is an odds thing, or a likelyhood thing, and it's true over the long haul and it is only a predictor. When I meet an individual, I'm open to learn about that person and become friends with one regardless of color. If one hits me over the head, however, I will reject the opportunity of friendship immediately.

Again, I realize that that you disdain some truths.

Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
We all prejudge everything, only I'm willing to admit it.


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Hell, Forkie, my friend Dom was born in Tanzania and lived there and Kenya for the first 48 years of his life. Like me, he's now a 54 year old American citizen. This makes him one of the only true African Americans living within the United States...
"Some of my best friends are..." Well, that clinches it.

But actually, racially prejudiced is a much better term because it's self-describing: to pre-judge based on race, right? So Boilerman, by advocating racially profiling by police, you are not only justifying racial prejudice, you want to codify it into law.




I sse where you're coming from boilerman and I wholeheartedly agree on the airport profiling. Call me racist if it makes anyone feel better, really don't care.


Nope, each person in court should be judged only on the evidence............color, gender, and sexual orientation excluded.


Quote

Originally posted by: jillyf
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
I would look positively on a Constitutional Amendment to clear up this matter, eliminating the possibilty of such suits.
Oh, so you want to amend the US Constitution so that the clean shaven guy who shows up to Court wearing a suit can be treated differently than the guy with tats who's wearing a Heat jersey. Well, just put me in that big pile of "truth disdainers." But you might find some friendly ears in the Chris Christie administration.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
...Call me racist if it makes anyone feel better, really don't care.
I prefer the phrase racially prejudiced. And yeah, I already knew that. It shows in your politics.

Give me a list of when it's okay to profile by race. Is this acceptable? How about entrance quotas to college. How about this?

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/diseases-common-minorities/story?id=14722258

Picking and choosing when to ignore the truth and when to pay attention to the truth seems silly, by very Liberally PC.





Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
...Call me racist if it makes anyone feel better, really don't care.
I prefer the phrase racially prejudiced. And yeah, I already knew that. It shows in your politics.



Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Nope, each person in court should be judged only on the evidence............color, gender, and sexual orientation excluded.
Oh, OK. They can be SEARCHED or DETAINED or ARRESTED based on religion, but once they get to the Courtroom they're equal. Whew, what a relief! For a while I thought you had gone off on some insane rant.

Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
...Call me racist if it makes anyone feel better, really don't care.
I prefer the phrase racially prejudiced. And yeah, I already knew that. It shows in your politics.


See there forkie, you got to feel a little better about your keyboard life didn't you?

You say racial profiling, I say Timothy McVeigh.
Okay, I'll put you down as deciding to ignore the truth and the facts.

Quote

Originally posted by: jillyf
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
I would look positively on a Constitutional Amendment to clear up this matter, eliminating the possibilty of such suits.
Oh, so you want to amend the US Constitution so that the clean shaven guy who shows up to Court wearing a suit can be treated differently than the guy with tats who's wearing a Heat jersey. Well, just put me in that big pile of "truth disdainers." But you might find some friendly ears in the Chris Christie administration.


No, don't put words in my mouth. They should never be arrested based on anything but the evidence at hand.


Quote

Originally posted by: jillyf
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Nope, each person in court should be judged only on the evidence............color, gender, and sexual orientation excluded.
Oh, OK. They can be SEARCHED or DETAINED or ARRESTED based on religion, but once they get to the Courtroom they're equal. Whew, what a relief! For a while I thought you had gone off on some insane rant.


No takers on the story of prejudice listed below?


Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Give me a list of when it's okay to profile by race. Is this acceptable? How about entrance quotas to college. How about this?

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/diseases-common-minorities/story?id=14722258

Picking and choosing when to ignore the truth and when to pay attention to the truth seems silly, by very Liberally PC.





Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
...Call me racist if it makes anyone feel better, really don't care.
I prefer the phrase racially prejudiced. And yeah, I already knew that. It shows in your politics.



Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now