Muslim voter registration bus tour

Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
Lol Alan tries to blame Democrats because a state employee that was hired by the Republican Governor to serve as dictator of Flint was a Democrat. I guess Obama isn't responsible for any policy that involved the military prior to 2011 because he retained Robert Gates, a Republican, to be defense secretary.

What about the Democrat Mayor and all those other city officials that supported the river water? You know....the local guys that you think can somehow manage better than the other democrat 'dictator' they agreed with. You're trying to turn a bureaucratic fuck up into a partisan issue...which it's not.

I'm just pointing out that a lot of the guys your side claims screwed it up are on your team. As to not telling the People IMMEDIATELY when it was found out...well that's just wrong and any politician or bureaucrat or doctor or scientist involved...Including the EPA and the Governor and local politicians should suffer for it.

In reality...I don't blame 'Democrats' or 'Republicans' though. I blame the individuals involved...bureaucrats and politicians. I blame the water engineers and water quality managers who approved this thing without enough study or testing.

I do object to your's and forkies blanket smear of Republicans. If you're going to play that game you might as well blame Obama too since the buck stops there and his EPA is responsible for...wait for it...'Environmental Protection'.

There's plenty of blame to go around. I just wish you'd admit it.


Number one it is not clear they supported anything other than it being used as a source of emergency water. Number 2 If you haven’t heard Democracy was suspended for black folks in Flint and other areas in Michigan. You either go along with what the appointed Dictator says or you are removed from elected office. If elected officials in these poor black areas want their paychecks as mayor or city council members, they have to goose step to the tune of the republican appointed dictator. Michigan’s emergency manger law renders elected local officials nothing more than mere figureheads with no authority to do anything. Even if I assume everything you say about local folks approving it is true, it means nothing because under Michigan law (Passed by the Republicans), they had no authority to approve it.

Furthermore, what makes this thing so wrong is that after people in the Governor’s office knew the water was bad, they kept trying to discredit the scientists that did the testing and kept telling the residents to drink the poison. You think because some lackey that serves at the governor’s pleasure says the water is safe, that it is the problem of lackey’s political party.

Even if we were to buy your ridiculous claims that the Democrats were of equal blame for selecting the water source, what happened afterwards was all on the Republicans that controlled the state.

Trying to run government on simplistic conservative talking points doesn’t work. In the 1960s, Flint had more than twice the population than it does now. The infrastructure including the roads, water and sewer were built to serve a population twice the current size. The population that is left is the lower income half of the population, so you have a tax base that can basically pay for a quarter or less of the existing infrastructure. There is no elected official Democratic or Republican that can magically make these types of numbers work on the local level. It is cowardly to blame the (black) population for changes in the automobile industry and claim mismanagement when the problem is simple math.

And that is really what this is all about. Cheap white republicans don’t want to acknowledge simple mathematical facts like these because they are cheap and a lot of them are racist. It is unsavory for them to think they might have to use State Funds to fix problems in Flint or Detroit because the blacks live there, so they spew propaganda like blacks are incapable of running a city. They simplistically think white folks just need to show them negros how to run the city like a business and it will be problem solved. The next thing you know 9,000 kids are being poisoned because the republicans running the city like a business didn’t want to spend $100 a day on anti-corrosive treatments.


I have a question. When you say "they"suspended democracy for black people, are you saying they were no longer eligible to vote? Only white people were allowed to vote is what you're saying then? Or is that your interpretation of how things were? Was it a white person who had control over everything?

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Yeah, Yeah. The Republican Governor of Michigan appointed a Black Democrat Emergency Manager to poison the people of Flint because Republicans don't like black people. I think that's enough political pandering for one day.



That's pretty much what I got out of it. A bit too far fetched, even for Mal.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Yeah, Yeah. The Republican Governor of Michigan appointed a Black Democrat Emergency Manager to poison the people of Flint because Republicans don't like black people. I think that's enough political pandering for one day.



That's pretty much what I got out of it. A bit too far fetched, even for Mal.


Lol no, relying on a racist belief that blacks can't be trusted to run a city, the Republicans in Michigan passed an Emergency manager law which allowed the part of the state government, run by white republicans, to take control of any municipality or school district they wanted. Even though officials in these areas had been elected, the emergency manager was allowed to fire them and they were stripped of all their power to make any type of decisions. The functions that were normally carried out by elected officials who had earned the public's trust were now carried out by a person appointed by a rich white male republican to cut costs. The reality is there is no way to cut a de-industrialized and de-populated area to a positive cash flow, so essential things like anti-corrosive treatments normally added to the water people drink were cut without any regard to the health and well being of the citizens. Then when they got caught in a giant cluster fuck of their own making, they lied and committed various criminal acts to cover up their wrongdoing instead of alerting people to the danger. This led to permanent neurological damage in thousands of people and in some cases even death.
If Obama ousted the democratically elected governor of Texas and replaced him with someone he hand picked to do the job instead...well, you can only imagine the response from FOX News, the Clive Bundy Clan, our resident conservatives, and our resident liberals, and everyone else. Because it would be an egregious violation of democracy.

The fact that Snyder's administration enacted this kind of governance is unforgiveable in of itself. The fact that the Flint water crisis became of it just makes it 10x worse.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
If Obama ousted the democratically elected governor of Texas and replaced him with someone he hand picked to do the job instead...well, you can only imagine the response from FOX News, the Clive Bundy Clan, our resident conservatives, and our resident liberals, and everyone else. Because it would be an egregious violation of democracy.

The fact that Snyder's administration enacted this kind of governance is unforgiveable in of itself. The fact that the Flint water crisis became of it just makes it 10x worse.


Now PJ lets not be silly. Alan already told us how this works. All Obama would have to do is appoint a Republican to take the elected governor's place and all the white Republican's in Texas would drop to their knees singing Obama's praises for appointing "one of them" to take the place of their elected governor.
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
If Obama ousted the democratically elected governor of Texas and replaced him with someone he hand picked to do the job instead...well, you can only imagine the response from FOX News, the Clive Bundy Clan, our resident conservatives, and our resident liberals, and everyone else. Because it would be an egregious violation of democracy.

The fact that Snyder's administration enacted this kind of governance is unforgiveable in of itself. The fact that the Flint water crisis became of it just makes it 10x worse.


Cities lose the ability to control their own financial destiny when they go into receivership or bankruptcy. Do you consider court appointed receivers an 'egregious violation of democracy'? Funny I haven't heard you complaining about this issue until today.

Of course Snyder's administration wasn't the first in Michigan history to oversee appointment of an emergency financial manager to control the finances of struggling cities. Public Act 101 of 1988 was the initial law that allowed appointment of an 'emergency financial manager' by the 'Local Emergency Financial Assistance Loan Board'. Public Act 101 was passed by the democratic Michigan Legislature and signed into law by Democrat Governor James Blanchard.

They've had some kind of emergency manager law that allowed a state appointed manager to take over the finances from democratically elected city officials....on the books for 38 years. Where was PJ's outrage at the 'egregious violation of democracy' when Hamtrack City had the first Emergency Financial Manager back in 1988?

The only reason this is an issue is some bureaucrat made a horrible decision and it looks like others covered it up. That bureaucrat may be lifelong Democrat Darnell Earley. Earley had a long career as a public administrator and municipal manager...including serving as city administrator of Flint and Temporary Mayor of Flint. The implication by maliber and forkush is that Earley was acting under orders of Governor Snyder to make that decision. Where is the proof of that? Isn't it equally probable that as an acting city manager this was just one of many decisions he made (if it really was his decision)? Perhaps these kinds of decisions in a relatively small Michigan town never even got on the Governor's radar until the problems started?

Make no mistake. Earley did not act alone in this decision. I guarantee they will uncover a whole host of incompetent city, county, and state employees that had a hand in it....where were the studies? What did the Water Department bureaucrats say about it? Who approved this as a good plan from a technical standpoint?

The subsequent conduct that exposed Flint residents to toxic water after the lead issues were uncovered is what's truly egregious. That should be a criminal investigation that explores the role of Earley, Snyder, The Former Mayor, the EPA and every city, country, state and federal employee who had knowledge the water was poisoned and did nothing to make that knowledge public.

Go on and blame the Republican Governor though. He had a role and that's what Democrats and Republicans do...Never let a good crisis go to waste. If you're honest about it, maybe you'll start to question the bureaucratic bunglers at all levels of government and of both parties who allowed this crisis to happen. Make no mistake. This could have happened with a Democrat Governor and a Republican Emergency Manager. And the Republicans would be all over it...blaming the Governor. Because that's what you guys do.

The only reason I got involved in this thread was Forkush blamed 'Republicans' for poisoning the residents of Flint. I corrected him to say 'Bureaucrats' because I really didn't think any political party would be responsible for causing such grief and there had to be many mistakes by lots of people of both parties along the way. I'd be really interested in the opinions of Michigan residents....and how their political affiliation impacts their view of who's really to blame.
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

....

The only reason I got involved in this thread was Forkush blamed 'Republicans' for poisoning the residents of Flint. I corrected him to say 'Bureaucrats' because I really didn't think any political party would be responsible for causing such grief and there had to be many mistakes by lots of people of both parties along the way. I'd be really interested in the opinions of Michigan residents....and how their political affiliation impacts their view of who's really to blame.


Wow - a voice of reason. Instead of blaming the situation on politics, I say follow the money. I expect there were payments made to people along the way and I also expect these people may have been of both parties (Republican and Democrat) and both races (Black and White).

But there is no sense letting a good crisis go the waste.

Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

....

The only reason I got involved in this thread was Forkush blamed 'Republicans' for poisoning the residents of Flint. I corrected him to say 'Bureaucrats' because I really didn't think any political party would be responsible for causing such grief and there had to be many mistakes by lots of people of both parties along the way. I'd be really interested in the opinions of Michigan residents....and how their political affiliation impacts their view of who's really to blame.


Wow - a voice of reason. Instead of blaming the situation on politics, I say follow the money. I expect there were payments made to people along the way and I also expect these people may have been of both parties (Republican and Democrat) and both races (Black and White).

But there is no sense letting a good crisis go the waste.


I agree 100%. Alan is very believable and he has no agenda, while Mal, PJ, and forky do. If a white republicanemergency manager had been appointed, that would give a tiny shred of legitimacy to his story, but he's not either so that blows that out of the water.

Every single person who had authority to approve the Flint River plan, EVERY SINGLE ONE WITHOUT EXCEPTION was working for the governor. EXACTLY ZERO were locally elected officials or their employees. The governor's appointee in Flint knew about it over a year ago, and did nothing. Some of the governor's appointees were informed of the problem over a year ago, and said nothing, and did nothing.

At best it was criminal negligence. It will probably cost hundreds of millions of dollars to ameliorate. It has and will continue to cost a great deal of human suffering.

The governor needs to resign.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: jphelan
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh

....

The only reason I got involved in this thread was Forkush blamed 'Republicans' for poisoning the residents of Flint. I corrected him to say 'Bureaucrats' because I really didn't think any political party would be responsible for causing such grief and there had to be many mistakes by lots of people of both parties along the way. I'd be really interested in the opinions of Michigan residents....and how their political affiliation impacts their view of who's really to blame.


Wow - a voice of reason. Instead of blaming the situation on politics, I say follow the money. I expect there were payments made to people along the way and I also expect these people may have been of both parties (Republican and Democrat) and both races (Black and White).

But there is no sense letting a good crisis go the waste.


I agree 100%. Alan is very believable...
Why would anyone say that? When he claimed that the Flint River decision was made by the city council, he was untruthful. When he failed to admit he was wrong, he proved himself untrustworthy.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now