Muslim voter registration bus tour

Islam is not a race, so the issues that I have with Muslims can't be racism.

Now let's address the definition of racism that PJ posts, and the word "inherent". Boiler doesn't believe that any groups faults are inherent, so that rules me out as a racist towards any group.

While I'm a Reds fan, I fully admit that they suck. A few of the players last year where outstanding, bringing to mind Brandon Phillips and Joey Votto. PJ, since Boiler believes that the as a group the Reds suck, does this make me a "Redsist", or I'm I simply stating the facts? The facts prove me correct, by the way.

Once we are forbidden to state the truth, we are in trouble.


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
I present facts and lurker resorts to the liberal fall back position of calling me a racist.


Whats the correct word to describe someone who attributes "violent behavior" to a broad based group of people based upon the color of their skin? Maybe the dictionary can help:

racism: a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.



Are the facts that I presented correct? If so how is that racist?


Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
Do blacks commit crimes at a rate that is higher than other demographic groups - Yes

Do blacks vote 95% democratic - Yes

Is stating facts racism - only in the eyes of a liberal


And the causing factor of those crimes is the melanin pigment in their skin according to "non-racist" Hoops, hence his analysis by that very attribute. You'll find similar analysis on your favorite Aryan propaganda website. Enjoy!

And, yes, people with that skin color overwhelmingly vote for politicians that don't incorprate that same analysis. And on behalf of all Democrats in every election I say, "Thank You, Hoops, for demonstrating why they do."


Well now, you just stated a "fact" (amount of blacks who vote Dem), how is that different from Hoops stated "fact"? Does the melanin content of their skin influence the way Blacks vote? Buy your accusation and by your reason, the claim you just stated is every bit as racist as Hoops claim. See the hypocrisy/double standard?

BTW lurker, I never saw hoops post a word about hating blacks and "so Hoops hates blacks and wants to get rid off them as soon as possible". Talk about making shit up.

Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99

Well now, you just stated a "fact" (amount of blacks who vote Dem), how is that different from Hoops stated "fact"? Does the melanin content of their skin influence the way Blacks vote? Buy your accusation and by your reason, the claim you just stated is every bit as racist as Hoops claim. See the hypocrisy/double standard?

BTW lurker, I never saw hoops post a word about hating blacks and "so Hoops hates blacks and wants to get rid off them as soon as possible". Talk about making shit up.


Ah....because people don't vote for politicians that stereotype them based upon their skin color.

I could use Hoops' same "non-racist" argument to accurately say that right wing terror incidents in the US happen in much greater proportion with the white community. That is a true statement. And if I connected you to those statistics based upon the color of your skin I'd be a racist. I'm not that ignorant. Some people on this board are. You've seen them post already on this thread.




I'm leaving in a few minutes to watch football with my Tanzanian very black friend, Dom. I suspect that Hoops would find Dom very pleasant, and that they would also become friends if they had the chance. Hoops is not racist.

Dom also loves soccer, and that does suck..........but I can overlook that.
Whites make up about 75% of the population & Muslims make up less than 1%, so one would expect whites to be involved in more terrorist incidents. However on a percentage basis, the Muslim terrorist rate far exceeds that of the white population.

Please note the terrorist shooting of the Philly cop last week.

So now that I have posted another fact will I be called a racist again?
PJ will spin that again, just as he did with my post. He' must be making forkie proud.
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
PJ will spin that again, just as he did with my post. He' must be making forkie proud.


Yes, I'll spin it back to the point I made instead of the one non-racist Hoops knocked down. I'll underline it this time too for the reading impaired.

"Right Wing terror" is massively disproportionate among white people vs Muslims in this country. But I wouldn't condone a stop-n-frisk policy in NY to look for assault weapons in White people since they are more likely to fit that profile. But guess who does favor stop-n-frisk for people that are black? Non-racist Hoops! He isn't racist. Really, he isn't. Nevermind how words are defined in the dictionary.

Since Sept. 11, 2001, nearly twice as many people have been killed by white supremacists, antigovernment fanatics and other non-Muslim extremists than by radical Muslims
Pj makes it so easy.

First his article is out of date as it does not include San Bernadino which brings the count by Islamists to 40. So we have 48 people killed by a population of 250m vs 40 by a population of less than 3m.

The article conveniently left out all the attacks thwarted by the police of Islamic attacks. For ezample the the car bomb in NYC several years ago would have killed hundreds if it had gone off.
So let's get more. Yea, that's it!
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now