Quote
Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA
It is through such specious reasoning that we can construct proofs that the sex of one child depends upon the sex of A DIFFERENT CHILD.
Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA
QuoteObviously, the author is full of shit. Nothing changes anywhere when I name something... except in my head, where a cognition is created. That cognition changes nothing, except itself. There is no change to the thing that was named.
Originally posted by: FrankKneeland Nothing happens in your head when you name one of the girls. Naming one of them changes everything, it just isn't obvious unless you do the work on paper. According to the book I read, this is an example of a ubiquitous cognitive distortion we all have, caused by a heuristic the brain uses to solve such problems.
It is through such specious reasoning that we can construct proofs that the sex of one child depends upon the sex of A DIFFERENT CHILD.
Yes well I suggest that if that's how you feel you should contact him. The book is called "The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives". The author's name is Leonard Mlodinow: https://www.amazon.com/Leonard-Mlodinow/e/B001IGP3W0/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1
He also talked in the book about how upset certain people get about this particular question, if they fall into the category of people who's brains apparently can't grasp it. A 10,000+ letter write in ensued after a columnist published such an answer in her column and it took years before they finally had to agree with her and retract their comments. You may have heard about it: The Monty Hall Problem? (It requires the same type of logic to solve).
Since this isn't my idea I certainly have no problem with you disagreeing. Thought you might like to know who you were disagreeing with.