Quote
Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA
Naming a girl "Florida" doesn't create a girl named "Florida" (which "expands the sample space," according to the inane author). It is through such specious reasoning that we can construct proofs that the sex of one child depends upon the sex of A DIFFERENT CHILD.
Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA
QuoteObviously, the author is full of shit. Nothing changes anywhere when I name something... except in my head, where a cognition is created. That cognition changes nothing, except itself. There is no change to the thing that was named.
Originally posted by: FrankKneeland Nothing happens in your head when you name one of the girls... Naming one of them changes everything, it just isn't obvious unless you do the work on paper. According to the book I read, this is an example of a ubiquitous cognitive distortion we all have, caused by a heuristic the brain uses to solve such problems.
Naming a girl "Florida" doesn't create a girl named "Florida" (which "expands the sample space," according to the inane author). It is through such specious reasoning that we can construct proofs that the sex of one child depends upon the sex of A DIFFERENT CHILD.
I agree that he's usually full of shit but this time he's right. Change the example to once in a while one of the set of twins is a Martian and all Martians are girls. If you know one of the twins is a Martian you are eliminating the subset of 2 non=Martians and only focusing on the remaining subset (MB,MG).