Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

Quote

---

Originally posted by: FrankKneeland

Quote

---

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Frank I'm afraid we can't discuss RS until we decide what language to use. Isn't that something like you said on my forum? Miscommunication?

---

Yes I thought we just had. You understand now that if Rob doesn't exactly follow the mathematical approach, mathematicians consider that to be disputing the math.

Therefore when you say, "Rob doesn't dispute the math", everyone jumps down your throat and calls you a lier.

Instead of: "Rob doesn't dispute the math".

Try this: "Rob chooses not to follow the mathematically optimal strategy because he believes more than math is required to gain an edge in video poker. He doesn't dispute the equations themselves, only their application. He admits 2+2 = 4 he just doesn't think it applies to this situation."

If you use this alternate version, you're essentially saying the same thing more accurately and you'll get far less abuse.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: MoneyLA

Quote

---

Originally posted by: FrankKneeland

Quote

---

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Frank I'm afraid we can't discuss RS until we decide what language to use. Isn't that something like you said on my forum? Miscommunication?

---

Yes I thought we just had. You understand now that if Rob doesn't exactly follow the mathematical approach, mathematicians consider that to be disputing the math.

Therefore when you say, "Rob doesn't dispute the math", everyone jumps down your throat and calls you a lier.

Instead of: "Rob doesn't dispute the math".

Try this: "Rob chooses not to follow the mathematically optimal strategy because he believes more than math is required to gain an edge in video poker. He doesn't dispute the equations themselves, only their application. He admits 2+2 = 4 he just doesn't think it applies to this situation."

If you use this alternate version, you're essentially saying the same thing more accurately and you'll get far less abuse.

---

Well Frank I think I said that all along and you correctly summed up Rob's strategy as well when you said he doesn't think the math play applies to every situation.

I gave the analogy about craps: if you played by the math you would only bet the pass or don't pass--- period. Every other bet does not apply to the math of the game.

So I guess that every craps player who ever bet the field or the horn or placed th 4 is a madman like RS?

This whole thing was just a silly waste and put everybody in a tizzy.

If any of the math guys ever believed in the math they'd never set foot in a casino.

More importantly how was the big date and what about a wedding?

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: FrankKneeland
And of these "more streetcars" some of them have: graffiti on the outside, bullet holes, broken windows, graffiti on the inside, squeaky wheels, rust, puke under the seats, no driver...

---