Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

no thats bags.

You are correct in that "bags" is being used to carrying a tool named "Shar".

But to bring you up to date on the inside soap opera, there is a site member here named BAGIANT, frequently referred to as "Bags", who a few months ago met up with a girl Sharlene, frequently referred to as Shar among other names such as "skank ho". Bags met Shar through a common acquaintance when he was looking for someone who in exchange for money would meet his sexual needs in that were being left unmet by his partner that he has been with for the last 17 years. Since then we have followed the saga through numerous Vegas trips with the different girls in adjoining rooms, trips to jail on drug changes, stolen property, orgies with a guy named G-Money (not to be confused with MoneyLA, I don't think), missing days, alcoholic haze, rehab, and other assorted side dramas like hiring convicts as home care nurses.

When you used terms such as graffiti, bullet holes, no driver in terms of women, it just made me think of Bags and Shar, as Shar has lots of graffiti on her body and a bullet hole through her clitoral hood with what we affectionately call a hood ornament.

your pun was lightyears better than mine.

Thank you for the explanation Kaypea, not sure my life is better for the knowing, but thanks. Here's what I thought Shar was referring to:

shar definition
tool, file format ("Shell archive", after ar and tar) Any of the many Unix programs that creates a flattened representation of one or more files, with the unique property that it can be unflattened (the original files extracted) merely by feeding it through a standard Unix shell. The output of shar, known as a "shar file" or "sharchive", can be distributed to anyone running Unix, and no special unpacking software is required. Sharchives are intriguing in that they are typically created by shell scripts; the script that produces sharchives is thus a script which produces self-unpacking scripts, which may themselves contain scripts. The disadvantage of sharchives are that they are an ideal venue for Trojan horse attacks and that, for recipients not running Unix, no simple un-sharchiving program is possible; sharchives can and do make use of arbitrarily-powerful shell features and other Unix commands. Different implementations of shar vary in sophistication. Some just uuencode each input file and output commands to uudecode the result, others include extensive checking to make sure the files have been transferred without corruption and that all parts of a multi-file sharchive have been unpacked. The unshar utility strips off mail and news headers before passing the remainder of its input to sh. (1996-10-18)

That's a Shar that I do understand.

Okay,

Back to business. When is your anticipated date of your evaluation, or is this going to linger through the holiday season?

Hmm, notwithstanding first arcimede's obsession with Singer on every forum imagineable and then with as Snidely so correctly illuminated, DENIAL, I'm fiding the bagiant obsession with that slut Shar even more interesting. Who puts up a picture of such a drugged out jailhouse skank on a forum, especially after saying you've bonked the bitch?I have no other words to express such bad taste.

But back to arcimedes and his forum-wide denials and arguing with anyone he thinks is Singer, including me. On videopoker.com he got chastised by the administrator for bickering today and it was with someone he accused of being Singer. But even in the presence of seemingly irrefutablepast proof as told by our own Frank Kneeland (hope I spelled it right this time) who mailed the backslider his book and it wasn't to Singer or anyone near him, arcimedes and his handful of supporters still don't want that to be true so they continue to Singer-bash the guy. Now on this forum a relatively new personality (Frank K) shows up who is well spoken and intelligent, so arcimedes feels people will look at him as more capable than him so he starts attacking at any angle possible.

Just as I've said, I credit Singer with putting a life-long hurt on the guy. He tells obvious lies about Singer everywhere he posts, he pretends anyone who says one decent word about the guy is Singer just so he can display his frustration, and he's knee-deep in DENIAL about anything said about him that doesn't ooze praise.

I believe Singer did one hellava job on him on Rex, and it musta hit home with amazing accuracy. Normally I'd be disgusted over such a take-down, but not with such a loon as this internet troll.

I'm meeting with RS tomorrow. I then expect it to take 1-2 weeks after that at most. Here sooner would be more likely. It really depends on what he has to say. I'm at 7000 words and counting.

I warping up writing a Q&A for RS right now. I'd like to include 3 questions from LVA posters. Could you all please think up your best questions and then we'll vote on the top three. Thanks.

Oh and please make them questions he would actually answer, not insults. This is intended to be serious. Brevity would be misplaced here and only serve to confound an already difficult to broach topic. Ask real question designed to reveal real thing you are unsure about and want answers to regarding the RS system.

If I've already covered it, I'll tell you and you can submit something else. I'm looking for things I have not thought of yet. I've thought of a lot, but I'm far from perfect. Help me out here. Thanks again in advance.

"If Rob Singer were a tree, what kind of tree would he be?"