Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

Just the opposite: I'm following the best advice out there. Frank: please post it on your site and prrovide a download option for those who want it.

Does that end this discussion or are you going to argue it further? For a thousand posts, perhaps?

Just download the pdf when it is available and stop being so high maintenance.

Oh, so now we've got eco-terrorists in here. Wonderful. Point that finger again, and I'll cut it off.

I can evaluate it in 6 words. Mathematically the system provides no advantage.
.

but mathematically there is a chance one system can beat another system, thats the hope of most Vegas Visitors, to defy the odds, u always have a mathematical chance to be a bigger winner. thats all

Again, I want to say "Thank You" to Frank for taking the time, energy, and effort to put this "study" together and share his findings with us. Whether you read and agree or disagree with the information, and his evaluation and conclusion, I want to offer my thanks and gratitude for making the effort, and I intend to read and study the information with an open mind, clear of prejudice and hopeful for clear and concise explanations and insight.

I have no doubt there is and will be some excellent advice contained in the much anticipated evaluation. No matter which "side" you may lean, there should be good information contained within it's pages that anyone can benefit from.


Is this article going to include pictures? Drawings, charts, graphs, tables, formulas? Maybe some cocktail recipes?

Bulletin news: I agree with you, Arc.

Late breaking news: No one ever said it did.

Flash: including Singer.

Most of the information will probably be subjective. Although one can go into varying levels of detail to say what I said in 6 words, it is more likely the rest of the words will not solve much of anything.

For example, it's been well known for decades that a negative progression like Singer's leads to more "session" wins depending on your definition of session. Now, is that good or bad ... subjective.

It's also possible to discuss whether Singer's special plays really do lead to more quick wins. That could get into some math as well and could be informative. Those are possible "varying level of details" I mentioned above.

25000 words not withstanding, here is my cliffs notes prediction: Singer's system will work for a high percentage of people/sessions. Most people/sessions will be winners but a small number of people/sessions will be be big, big losers. The more one plays and approaches "long term" the more likely they will see that big, big loser session. Therefore: with the "math" system, the more you play (with an advantage) the more likely you are to be a winner. With the Singer system the more you play, the more likely you are to be a loser. Singer will argue that you won't play enough in your lifetime to reach the number of hands/sessions to put you at risk of being a loser with his system.

Revealing photographs of the bewitching, ingenuous, enigmatic Jess?