Las Vegas Advisor Menu
« LVA Forums « Vegas Free-for-All

Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

KayPea
KayPea
Nov 14, 2011
12:34am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
I can evaluate it in 6 words. Mathematically the system provides no advantage.
.


A Mathematical analysis is easy. What can you say about the system that is not based on math?
MoneyLA
MoneyLA
Nov 14, 2011
12:34am
Block User
Prediction: the Singer system has too many variables and cannot be tested. Therefore it cannot be proven to be valid or invalid. This is because you cannot define when Singer will deviate from the math to make a "special play" and you can't define his particular win gooals or loss limits as they could vary.
snidely333
snidely333
Nov 14, 2011
12:37am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote
Originally posted by: RoadTrip
Is this article going to include pictures? Drawings, charts, graphs, tables, formulas? Maybe some cocktail recipes?
Revealing photographs of the bewitching, ingenuous, enigmatic Jess?


KayPea
KayPea
Nov 14, 2011
12:37am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Therefore it cannot be proven to be valid or invalid.


I anything in life either valid or invalid?
There are too many shades of gray in my world to say absolutely one way or the other.

arcimedes
arcimedes
Nov 14, 2011
1:19am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Prediction: the Singer system has too many variables and cannot be tested. Therefore it cannot be proven to be valid or invalid. This is because you cannot define when Singer will deviate from the math to make a "special play" and you can't define his particular win gooals or loss limits as they could vary.


Well, first you have to define what you mean by "valid". If you mean the system will increase the probability that you will improve your future results, then it can be tested.

All the variables in Singer's system REDUCE the return of those plays. If Mx is a maximum return of a play and Sx is the return of Singer's choices we know (S1<M1, S2<M2, etc) and hence by simple addition we know S<M (S1+S2+... < M1+M2+...) So, using statistics (based on independent results) it's pretty easy to state unequivoacably that Singer's system has been proven to be invalid.

You see, once you understand that ANY deviation from perfect play reduces the return of his system, it's pretty easy to say your caveat of "too many variables" is nonsense.

RoadTrip
RoadTrip
Nov 14, 2011
1:21am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote
Originally posted by: RoadTrip
Is this article going to include pictures? Drawings, charts, graphs, tables, formulas? Maybe some cocktail recipes?
Revealing photographs of the bewitching, ingenuous, enigmatic Jess?




That's her pet dog which was taken by a coyote. Probably for dinner.





arcimedes
arcimedes
Nov 14, 2011
1:24am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: KayPea
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
I can evaluate it in 6 words. Mathematically the system provides no advantage.
.


A Mathematical analysis is easy. What can you say about the system that is not based on math?


All VP gambling systems can be evaluated by math so your statement is a strawman. Just because the producer of a system does not understand the math (fits Singer to a tee) doesn't make it go away. Hence, your statement is not possible.

It's kind of like saying "What if my space rocket isn't based on overcoming gravity ..."

KarenTN
KarenTN
Nov 14, 2011
2:04am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: RoadTrip
Quote
Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote
Originally posted by: RoadTrip
Is this article going to include pictures? Drawings, charts, graphs, tables, formulas? Maybe some cocktail recipes?
Revealing photographs of the bewitching, ingenuous, enigmatic Jess?




That's her pet dog which was taken by a coyote. Probably for dinner.



oh, how very sad

KayPea
KayPea
Nov 14, 2011
2:08am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
What if my space rocket isn't based on overcoming gravity


The Las Vegas Hilton used to have a space ship in their casino. It had nothing to do with overcoming gravity. It was there purely for entertainment. Some people also see casino games as entertainment rather than a mathematical problem to be solved.
FrankKneeland
FrankKneeland
Nov 14, 2011
2:48am
Block User
Quote
Originally posted by: RoadTrip
Or an audio podcast I can download and listen to when I have a couple free days?

Since no one else has said this yet, thanks for taking on this "project".

I, for one, look forward to the final results, as well as the forum thread your "article" is almost certain to spawn.



Yes well thanks. It has been both fun, informative, frustrating and other "F" words as well. (Keep it clean boys)

It's nothing I would have ever done had I not been asked. But I am glad that I had the opportunity, because it really has clued me in on the source of a lot of conflict in our society, misunderstanding.

~FK
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now