Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

Some people just like to disagree and be contrary.

and a beer or two.

I disagree!...and I'm not being contrary or defensive.

I posted six questions for Rob which I think will clear up the basics of his system into a language all of us can understand... at least I hope it can.

Frank has told me that much of the problem is in the translation and interpretation and meaning and intent of the language used by Rob, by me, by the math guys and the non-math guys, as well as the interpretations that me and the other 85% of the world get wrong because our majority end of the gene pool isn't as smart as the 15% at the other end of the gene pool.

Anyway, not to get into a discussion about why the 85% is inferior, or that the laws in this country are made by the majority, I think my questions to Rob will go a long way.

You will find them here: https://forum.alanbestbuys.com/showthread.php?494-Rob-Singer-Please-clear-up-a-few-points.

I posted them there because that is where Rob can respond, without relaying of quotes by me or Bagiant or anyone else.

We only briefly touched on these points in our video taped interviews and some, dare I say, were not specifically asked or answers because (and I'm afraid to say this) Rob and I speak the same language. I guess we are both in the 85% of the gene pool that doesn't think the same way as the superior 15%.

As an example of how the 85% thinks: leaving with a profit is logical, then returning to play some more. And we can measure profits per session while recognizing we might lose over a lifetime. Go ahead and shoot me for thinking that way.

Frank.... Hope your toes don't hurt from getting stepped on.

Money.... I do not understand why you would "ask" those questions, some of, if not all, Frank will most likely address in his assessment. Your are stepping on his toes, and I find your "six questions", and answers to be inappropriate and disrespectful toward Frank and his hard work on this topic.

You should have waited to see if Frank does address those "questions", and not infringed on his hard work.

Sheesh. The least you should do is give the man a chance to proffer his results which he has been working hard to present.

Oh, I reluctantly did visit your site to read that message. Your site will not be getting any more hits from this internet user. I also do not believe it appropriate to post links to your forum on this one.

IMHO, you've shown very little class, if any class.

I have every right to ask whatever questions I want. And if you recall, I was the first to question Singer about his system. What Frank writes is Frank's work. What I do is my work.

I am not questioning your right to ask anything you want. Good men, and women have died in battles defending your rights, and our constitution which defines those rights.

As for being the first to question Singer about his system, you may have been the first, I do not know nor do I care who was "first". If you believe that, than so be it. If you were, good for you. If not, perhaps someone will let us know. That is not an important issue in this discussion.

What I do think is that you know that Franks is onto something that is going to be good, and that being the person you obviously are, decided to interject yourself to once again "be first".

Yes, what you do is your work. Even if you take somebody else idea and twist them to your own purposes.

And that is what I think "your work" is doing.

I find it impolite. You could have easily waited several days for Franks writing, which will perhaps answer those questions.

Your message, IMHO, is just impolite and disrespectful.

Sorry Roadtrip but the New York Times does not wait for the Washington Post to publish its story. Nor does the Times have to follow the lead or the point of view of the Post. Want some more lessons in freedom of the press?

Frank and I have not discussed what questions he is asking, or what his point of view is, so I am not stepping on his "toes." Nor are there any "toes" to step on. You are being childish.

Are you afraid that Rob Singer might have an opportunity to say what he thinks himself?

Part of the problem here is that everyone is talking about Rob and Rob can't defend himself. I find that to be absolutely immature.

Frankly, if Rob had been allowed to respond to some of the comments in this thread we wouldn't be having this discussion now.

He has responded to several of them, or at least his staff member has.