Vegas Free-for-All - Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

Nearing Completion of Evaluation of RS system (not)

mrmarcus12LVA

Oct 25, 2011
8:14pm

Quote

Originally posted by: FrankKneeland
And thus the thread dies, not with a bang, not in fire, nor with a shout, but with a whimper and ruminations of grown men playing with their balls. So go ye to your bread and circuses, only know that man cannot live on bread alone and when you watch the trapeze act, it is not the aerialists that works without a net, nor is he the one headed for a fall before which pride goeth.

Again, I can only recommend, "If it hurts when you do that, stop doing that."

snidely333

Oct 25, 2011
10:22pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: mrmarcus12LVA

Quote
Originally posted by: FrankKneeland
And thus the thread dies, not with a bang, not in fire, nor with a shout, but with a whimper and ruminations of grown men playing with their balls. So go ye to your bread and circuses, only know that man cannot live on bread alone and when you watch the trapeze act, it is not the aerialists that works without a net, nor is he the one headed for a fall before which pride goeth.

Again, I can only recommend, "If it hurts when you do that, stop doing that."

You should change your name to drmarcus12LVA.

Normscash

Oct 26, 2011
12:06pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: arcimedes

Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Oh, OH!
In the meantime, here's another question:

How far can one lower an infinite rope into a bottomless pit?

All the way ... assuming you have enough time
No, . . . this is incorrect.
One cannot lower the rope "all the way" even with all the time in the world.

I'm disappointed in you DD. You failed the logic test. You have to parse the statement from back to front. Since it would take an infinite amount of time then the last statement (you have enough time) is false. Since, the first statement is logically dependent on the last statement (assumed) then the first statement must be false.

I'll have to go with good old DD on this because he is correct. Doubletalking an answer with too many incoherent phrases only provides proof that someone doesn't like being set straight.

snidely333

Oct 26, 2011
2:08pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Normscash

Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Oh, OH!
In the meantime, here's another question:

How far can one lower an infinite rope into a bottomless pit?

All the way ... assuming you have enough time
No, . . . this is incorrect.
One cannot lower the rope "all the way" even with all the time in the world.

I'm disappointed in you DD. You failed the logic test. You have to parse the statement from back to front. Since it would take an infinite amount of time then the last statement (you have enough time) is false. Since, the first statement is logically dependent on the last statement (assumed) then the first statement must be false.

I'll have to go with good old DD on this because he is correct. Doubletalking an answer with too many incoherent phrases only provides proof that someone doesn't like being set straight.

Excuse me, but we refer to him as "poor old DD".

Don

Oct 26, 2011
7:14pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
How far can one lower an infinite rope into a bottomless pit?

That's it ? ? ?
No one cares to answer? Poor old DonDiego is saddened, . . . and not for the first time, . . . or, likely, the last.
The question has a legitimate honest-to-goodness "real" answer.

oobiedoobie

Oct 26, 2011
8:31pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego

Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
How far can one lower an infinite rope into a bottomless pit?

That's it ? ? ?
No one cares to answer? Poor old DonDiego is saddened, . . . and not for the first time, . . . or, likely, the last.
The question has a legitimate honest-to-goodness "real" answer.

Now you got me interested. But I don't want to think, it hurts my head too much. Awaiting the answer.

arcimedes

Oct 26, 2011
9:35pm

Block User

Quote

Originally posted by: Normscash

Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Quote
Originally posted by: arcimedes
Quote
Originally posted by: DonDiego
Oh, OH!
In the meantime, here's another question:

How far can one lower an infinite rope into a bottomless pit?

All the way ... assuming you have enough time
No, . . . this is incorrect.
One cannot lower the rope "all the way" even with all the time in the world.

I'm disappointed in you DD. You failed the logic test. You have to parse the statement from back to front. Since it would take an infinite amount of time then the last statement (you have enough time) is false. Since, the first statement is logically dependent on the last statement (assumed) then the first statement must be false.

I'll have to go with good old DD on this because he is correct. Doubletalking an answer with too many incoherent phrases only provides proof that someone doesn't like being set straight.

Rob, nice of you to drop by. Did you miss the wink at the end of my comment. That was the hint. Not surprised you didn't understand it though.

snidely333

Oct 26, 2011
10:22pm

Block User

"Forever"